{"title":"帮我帮你:欧盟如何使罗马尼亚的反腐败改革(暂时)成功","authors":"Elizabeth Chrun","doi":"10.1080/21599165.2022.2138860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Under what circumstances can the European Union (EU) be a positive force for anticorruption reforms, even after accession? I demonstrate that the interaction of sustained pressure from the EU and domestic agency can provide the conditions under which anticorruption reforms can succeed even following a state’s formal entry into the Union. I demonstrate this argument through a diachronic analysis of Romania’s anticorruption reforms focusing on its anticorruption agency, the Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie (DNA) pre-accession (2002–2006) and post-accession (2007–2016).","PeriodicalId":46570,"journal":{"name":"East European Politics","volume":"141 1","pages":"457 - 477"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Help me help you: how the EU made Romania’s anticorruption reforms a (temporary) success\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Chrun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21599165.2022.2138860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Under what circumstances can the European Union (EU) be a positive force for anticorruption reforms, even after accession? I demonstrate that the interaction of sustained pressure from the EU and domestic agency can provide the conditions under which anticorruption reforms can succeed even following a state’s formal entry into the Union. I demonstrate this argument through a diachronic analysis of Romania’s anticorruption reforms focusing on its anticorruption agency, the Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie (DNA) pre-accession (2002–2006) and post-accession (2007–2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East European Politics\",\"volume\":\"141 1\",\"pages\":\"457 - 477\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East European Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2138860\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East European Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2022.2138860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Help me help you: how the EU made Romania’s anticorruption reforms a (temporary) success
ABSTRACT Under what circumstances can the European Union (EU) be a positive force for anticorruption reforms, even after accession? I demonstrate that the interaction of sustained pressure from the EU and domestic agency can provide the conditions under which anticorruption reforms can succeed even following a state’s formal entry into the Union. I demonstrate this argument through a diachronic analysis of Romania’s anticorruption reforms focusing on its anticorruption agency, the Direcţia Naţională Anticorupţie (DNA) pre-accession (2002–2006) and post-accession (2007–2016).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
