企业社会责任披露质量:独立报告、保证、报告指南和利益相关者的影响

Regita Nendya Arum, Dewi Amalia
{"title":"企业社会责任披露质量:独立报告、保证、报告指南和利益相关者的影响","authors":"Regita Nendya Arum, Dewi Amalia","doi":"10.12928/jreksa.v9i2.6768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, reporting guidelines, and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) quality. Secondary data related to the investigated variables were documented from the sustainability reports of manufacturing companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Twenty-four companies were selected based on the purposive sampling method from 2018 to 2020, resulting in 72 firm-year data being investigated. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The analysis results show that reporting guidelines affect the quality of CSRD. Companies that follow the GRI reporting framework have high-quality CSRD. However, this study did not find the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, and stakeholders on CSRD quality.","PeriodicalId":34792,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Reksa","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CSR Disclosure Quality: The Impact of Stand-alone Reports, Assurances, Reporting Guidelines, and Stakeholders\",\"authors\":\"Regita Nendya Arum, Dewi Amalia\",\"doi\":\"10.12928/jreksa.v9i2.6768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to investigate the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, reporting guidelines, and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) quality. Secondary data related to the investigated variables were documented from the sustainability reports of manufacturing companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Twenty-four companies were selected based on the purposive sampling method from 2018 to 2020, resulting in 72 firm-year data being investigated. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The analysis results show that reporting guidelines affect the quality of CSRD. Companies that follow the GRI reporting framework have high-quality CSRD. However, this study did not find the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, and stakeholders on CSRD quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Reksa\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Reksa\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12928/jreksa.v9i2.6768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Reksa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12928/jreksa.v9i2.6768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨独立报告、保证、报告指引和利益相关者对企业社会责任披露质量的影响。与所调查变量相关的次要数据来自于在印度尼西亚证券交易所上市的制造公司的可持续发展报告。根据2018年至2020年的目的抽样方法,选择了24家公司,共调查了72家公司的年度数据。数据采用多元回归分析。分析结果表明,报告准则影响CSRD的质量。遵循GRI报告框架的公司拥有高质量的企业社会责任发展。然而,本研究并未发现独立报告、保证和利益相关者对CSRD质量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CSR Disclosure Quality: The Impact of Stand-alone Reports, Assurances, Reporting Guidelines, and Stakeholders
This study aims to investigate the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, reporting guidelines, and stakeholders on corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD) quality. Secondary data related to the investigated variables were documented from the sustainability reports of manufacturing companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Twenty-four companies were selected based on the purposive sampling method from 2018 to 2020, resulting in 72 firm-year data being investigated. The data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The analysis results show that reporting guidelines affect the quality of CSRD. Companies that follow the GRI reporting framework have high-quality CSRD. However, this study did not find the effect of stand-alone reports, assurances, and stakeholders on CSRD quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信