基于跨理论模型的问卷对Dhule区四类工人戒烟咨询的评价:一项随机对照试验

Mayuri Nepale, Prashanth Vishwakarma, A. Dodamani, V. Jain, G. Mali, A. Saxena
{"title":"基于跨理论模型的问卷对Dhule区四类工人戒烟咨询的评价:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Mayuri Nepale, Prashanth Vishwakarma, A. Dodamani, V. Jain, G. Mali, A. Saxena","doi":"10.4103/INPC.INPC_34_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Small number of tobacco users are fully aware of its harmful effects. Warning labels on tobacco products are an effective way of communicating the consequences of tobacco use and bring about behavioral changes such as quitting. Aim: The study aims to test the validity and reliability of a transtheoretical model (TTM) based questionnaire for tobacco cessation in Class IV workers. Methodology: A descriptive randomized control trial was carried out among 268 participants who were randomly selected from Class IV workers of Jawahar Soot Girni, Dhule. The participants were randomly divided by the block randomization technique into two groups equally as Group A and B, where Group A received verbal tobacco counseling and Group B received tobacco counseling in the form of pictorial warning. TTM model-based questionnaire was used as a method of measurement to evaluate the effect of pictorial warning interventions. Results: In the study group, preresponse 64% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 35.1% of participants said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning and post response was 22.4% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 77.6% said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning. The comparison showed there is a significant difference in pre- and postscore (P < 0.05). The pictorial warning was found to be statistically significant as compared to verbal instructions only. Conclusion: Warning labels on tobacco packs effectively inform people about the adverse health effects of tobacco when compared to oral instructions.","PeriodicalId":14257,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"46 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of transtheoretical model-based questionnaire for tobacco cessation counseling of Class IV workers in Dhule district: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Mayuri Nepale, Prashanth Vishwakarma, A. Dodamani, V. Jain, G. Mali, A. Saxena\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/INPC.INPC_34_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Small number of tobacco users are fully aware of its harmful effects. Warning labels on tobacco products are an effective way of communicating the consequences of tobacco use and bring about behavioral changes such as quitting. Aim: The study aims to test the validity and reliability of a transtheoretical model (TTM) based questionnaire for tobacco cessation in Class IV workers. Methodology: A descriptive randomized control trial was carried out among 268 participants who were randomly selected from Class IV workers of Jawahar Soot Girni, Dhule. The participants were randomly divided by the block randomization technique into two groups equally as Group A and B, where Group A received verbal tobacco counseling and Group B received tobacco counseling in the form of pictorial warning. TTM model-based questionnaire was used as a method of measurement to evaluate the effect of pictorial warning interventions. Results: In the study group, preresponse 64% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 35.1% of participants said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning and post response was 22.4% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 77.6% said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning. The comparison showed there is a significant difference in pre- and postscore (P < 0.05). The pictorial warning was found to be statistically significant as compared to verbal instructions only. Conclusion: Warning labels on tobacco packs effectively inform people about the adverse health effects of tobacco when compared to oral instructions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"46 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/INPC.INPC_34_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/INPC.INPC_34_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:少数烟草使用者充分意识到其有害影响。烟草制品上的警告标签是传达烟草使用后果的有效方式,并带来戒烟等行为改变。目的:本研究旨在检验基于跨理论模型(TTM)的第四类工人戒烟问卷的效度和信度。方法:采用描述性随机对照试验,从杜勒省贾瓦哈尔煤烟厂四类工人中随机抽取268人。采用块随机化技术将受试者随机分为A、B两组,A组接受口头烟草咨询,B组接受图片警示形式的烟草咨询。采用基于TTM模型的问卷作为测量方法来评估图片警告干预的效果。结果:在研究组中,应答前有64%的人回答“否”,他们没有因为健康警告的存在而感到不安,35.1%的人回答“是”,他们因为健康警告的存在而感到不安,应答后有22.4%的人回答“否”,他们没有因为健康警告的存在而感到不安,77.6%的人回答“是”,他们因为健康警告的存在而感到不安。经比较,前后评分差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。与口头指示相比,图片警告在统计上具有显著意义。结论:与口头说明相比,烟草包装上的警告标签有效地告知人们烟草对健康的不良影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of transtheoretical model-based questionnaire for tobacco cessation counseling of Class IV workers in Dhule district: A randomized controlled trial
Background: Small number of tobacco users are fully aware of its harmful effects. Warning labels on tobacco products are an effective way of communicating the consequences of tobacco use and bring about behavioral changes such as quitting. Aim: The study aims to test the validity and reliability of a transtheoretical model (TTM) based questionnaire for tobacco cessation in Class IV workers. Methodology: A descriptive randomized control trial was carried out among 268 participants who were randomly selected from Class IV workers of Jawahar Soot Girni, Dhule. The participants were randomly divided by the block randomization technique into two groups equally as Group A and B, where Group A received verbal tobacco counseling and Group B received tobacco counseling in the form of pictorial warning. TTM model-based questionnaire was used as a method of measurement to evaluate the effect of pictorial warning interventions. Results: In the study group, preresponse 64% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 35.1% of participants said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning and post response was 22.4% said no, they did not felt unease due to the presence of health warning, 77.6% said yes, they felt unease due to the presence of health warning. The comparison showed there is a significant difference in pre- and postscore (P < 0.05). The pictorial warning was found to be statistically significant as compared to verbal instructions only. Conclusion: Warning labels on tobacco packs effectively inform people about the adverse health effects of tobacco when compared to oral instructions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信