unmaking架构:一个关键框架的介绍

IF 0.3 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Jason E. Nguyen, Elizabeth J. Petcu
{"title":"unmaking架构:一个关键框架的介绍","authors":"Jason E. Nguyen, Elizabeth J. Petcu","doi":"10.1080/13602365.2023.2213559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This special issue of The Journal of Architecture surveys the concept of ‘unmaking’ as an overarching facet of architectural thinking and production that has yet to be considered at a synoptic scale. When we refer to ‘un-making’, we mean the actions that result in the dismantling of architectural forms, modes of thought, and means of production. A historical study of these operations, we hope, might generate necessary theoretical frameworks to conceptualise transformations in architecture amid today’s unprecedented sociopolitical and environmental challenges. The aim of this special issue is twofold: first, it brings into dialogue topics from across different periods and geographies that explore varied yet related notions of un-making; second, it introduces a range of theoretical approaches to analyse architectural disassembly that might further conversations and actions to reimagine the discourses, institutions, and practices in the field today. How might past and ongoing instances of architectural destruction paradoxically help us develop more critical and comprehensive methods to undertake the study, reform, and design of the built environment? Through the lens of this issue’s collected historical studies, we argue that mechanisms of architectural un-making in design, environments and technologies, and politics are interdependent and must be considered in tandem to address the extraordinary architectural challenges of the twenty-first century. The forces that un-make architecture, and by which architecture un-makes, shape the physical and conceptual landscapes of the built environment as well as the world in which architecture operates. Instances of architectural unmaking can evidence human agency, such as the dismantling of the original Pennsylvania Station in New York City beginning in 1963 to make way for its now widely reviled replacement. In this case, destruction unfolded both physically, in the razing of the building by McKim, Mead and White, as well as metaphorically, in the suppression of monumental symbols of civic life in the urban field. Un-making in architecture can additionally arise from natural and environmental disasters. The destruction wrought by the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, Hurricane Maria in 2017 in Puerto Rico, and the 2022 Pakistan floods highlights the urban and regional scales of natural catastrophes. Such natural and environmental forms of architectural un-making can be difficult to disentangle from human actions. For instance, the vulnerability of certain buildings, communities, and infrastructure in the Global South are linked to the lasting impacts of imperialism, including the design Jason E. Nguyen","PeriodicalId":44236,"journal":{"name":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un-making architecture: an introduction to a critical framework\",\"authors\":\"Jason E. Nguyen, Elizabeth J. Petcu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602365.2023.2213559\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This special issue of The Journal of Architecture surveys the concept of ‘unmaking’ as an overarching facet of architectural thinking and production that has yet to be considered at a synoptic scale. When we refer to ‘un-making’, we mean the actions that result in the dismantling of architectural forms, modes of thought, and means of production. A historical study of these operations, we hope, might generate necessary theoretical frameworks to conceptualise transformations in architecture amid today’s unprecedented sociopolitical and environmental challenges. The aim of this special issue is twofold: first, it brings into dialogue topics from across different periods and geographies that explore varied yet related notions of un-making; second, it introduces a range of theoretical approaches to analyse architectural disassembly that might further conversations and actions to reimagine the discourses, institutions, and practices in the field today. How might past and ongoing instances of architectural destruction paradoxically help us develop more critical and comprehensive methods to undertake the study, reform, and design of the built environment? Through the lens of this issue’s collected historical studies, we argue that mechanisms of architectural un-making in design, environments and technologies, and politics are interdependent and must be considered in tandem to address the extraordinary architectural challenges of the twenty-first century. The forces that un-make architecture, and by which architecture un-makes, shape the physical and conceptual landscapes of the built environment as well as the world in which architecture operates. Instances of architectural unmaking can evidence human agency, such as the dismantling of the original Pennsylvania Station in New York City beginning in 1963 to make way for its now widely reviled replacement. In this case, destruction unfolded both physically, in the razing of the building by McKim, Mead and White, as well as metaphorically, in the suppression of monumental symbols of civic life in the urban field. Un-making in architecture can additionally arise from natural and environmental disasters. The destruction wrought by the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, Hurricane Maria in 2017 in Puerto Rico, and the 2022 Pakistan floods highlights the urban and regional scales of natural catastrophes. Such natural and environmental forms of architectural un-making can be difficult to disentangle from human actions. For instance, the vulnerability of certain buildings, communities, and infrastructure in the Global South are linked to the lasting impacts of imperialism, including the design Jason E. Nguyen\",\"PeriodicalId\":44236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2213559\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2213559","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这期《建筑杂志》的特刊调查了“解构”的概念,将其作为建筑思维和生产的一个总体方面,尚未在概括性的尺度上加以考虑。当我们提到“解构”时,我们指的是导致建筑形式、思维模式和生产方式解体的行为。我们希望,对这些操作的历史研究可以产生必要的理论框架,以便在当今前所未有的社会政治和环境挑战中概念化建筑的转变。本期特刊的目的是双重的:首先,它带来了来自不同时期和地域的对话话题,探讨了不同但相关的“制造”概念;其次,它引入了一系列理论方法来分析建筑拆卸,这可能会进一步推动对话和行动,以重新想象当今该领域的话语、制度和实践。过去和正在进行的建筑破坏的实例如何帮助我们发展更重要和全面的方法来进行建筑环境的研究、改革和设计?通过本期收集的历史研究,我们认为在设计、环境和技术以及政治方面的建筑破坏机制是相互依存的,必须同时考虑,以应对21世纪的非凡建筑挑战。破坏建筑的力量,以及建筑破坏建筑的力量,塑造了建筑环境的物理和概念景观,以及建筑运作的世界。建筑拆除的例子可以证明人类的力量,比如1963年开始拆除纽约市原有的宾夕法尼亚车站,为现在广受诟病的新车站让路。在这种情况下,破坏既表现在物理上,在McKim, Mead和White的建筑中被夷为平地,也表现在隐喻上,在城市领域中对公民生活的纪念性符号的压制。自然灾害和环境灾害也可能导致建筑的破坏。2010年海地地震、2017年波多黎各飓风玛丽亚和2022年巴基斯坦洪水造成的破坏凸显了自然灾害的城市和区域规模。这种自然和环境形式的建筑解构很难与人类行为分开。例如,全球南方某些建筑、社区和基础设施的脆弱性与帝国主义的持久影响有关,包括Jason E. Nguyen的设计
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Un-making architecture: an introduction to a critical framework
This special issue of The Journal of Architecture surveys the concept of ‘unmaking’ as an overarching facet of architectural thinking and production that has yet to be considered at a synoptic scale. When we refer to ‘un-making’, we mean the actions that result in the dismantling of architectural forms, modes of thought, and means of production. A historical study of these operations, we hope, might generate necessary theoretical frameworks to conceptualise transformations in architecture amid today’s unprecedented sociopolitical and environmental challenges. The aim of this special issue is twofold: first, it brings into dialogue topics from across different periods and geographies that explore varied yet related notions of un-making; second, it introduces a range of theoretical approaches to analyse architectural disassembly that might further conversations and actions to reimagine the discourses, institutions, and practices in the field today. How might past and ongoing instances of architectural destruction paradoxically help us develop more critical and comprehensive methods to undertake the study, reform, and design of the built environment? Through the lens of this issue’s collected historical studies, we argue that mechanisms of architectural un-making in design, environments and technologies, and politics are interdependent and must be considered in tandem to address the extraordinary architectural challenges of the twenty-first century. The forces that un-make architecture, and by which architecture un-makes, shape the physical and conceptual landscapes of the built environment as well as the world in which architecture operates. Instances of architectural unmaking can evidence human agency, such as the dismantling of the original Pennsylvania Station in New York City beginning in 1963 to make way for its now widely reviled replacement. In this case, destruction unfolded both physically, in the razing of the building by McKim, Mead and White, as well as metaphorically, in the suppression of monumental symbols of civic life in the urban field. Un-making in architecture can additionally arise from natural and environmental disasters. The destruction wrought by the 2010 earthquake in Haiti, Hurricane Maria in 2017 in Puerto Rico, and the 2022 Pakistan floods highlights the urban and regional scales of natural catastrophes. Such natural and environmental forms of architectural un-making can be difficult to disentangle from human actions. For instance, the vulnerability of certain buildings, communities, and infrastructure in the Global South are linked to the lasting impacts of imperialism, including the design Jason E. Nguyen
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: METU JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE is a biannual refereed publication of the Middle East Technical University published every June and December, and offers a comprehensive range of articles contributing to the development of knowledge in man-environment relations, design and planning. METU JFA accepts submissions in English or Turkish, and assumes that the manuscripts received by the Journal have not been published previously or that are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Editorial Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. METU JFA invites theory, research and history papers on the following fields and related interdisciplinary topics: architecture and urbanism, planning and design, restoration and preservation, buildings and building systems technologies and design, product design and technologies. Prospective manuscripts for publication in these fields may constitute; 1. Original theoretical papers; 2. Original research papers; 3. Documents and critical expositions; 4. Applied studies related to professional practice; 5. Educational works, commentaries and reviews; 6. Book reviews Manuscripts, in English or Turkish, have to be approved by the Editorial Board, which are then forwarded to Referees before acceptance for publication. The Board claims no responsibility for the opinions expressed in the published manuscripts. It is assumed that the manuscripts received by the Journal are not sent to other journals for publication purposes and have not been previously published elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信