“这和爱情有什么关系?”:《俄国犹太人历史中的批判爱情研究》

Chaeran Y. Freeze
{"title":"“这和爱情有什么关系?”:《俄国犹太人历史中的批判爱情研究》","authors":"Chaeran Y. Freeze","doi":"10.1353/jqr.2022.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual","PeriodicalId":22606,"journal":{"name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"235 1","pages":"251 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“What’s Love Got to Do With It?”: Critical Love Studies in Russian Jewish History\",\"authors\":\"Chaeran Y. Freeze\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jqr.2022.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual\",\"PeriodicalId\":22606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"volume\":\"235 1\",\"pages\":\"251 - 255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Jewish Quarterly Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jqr.2022.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“What’s Love Got to Do With It?”: Critical Love Studies in Russian Jewish History
I N L E V L E VA N D A’ S Turbulent Times (Goriachee vremia), a novel serialized in Evreiskaia biblioteka between 1871 and 1873, the female protagonists ponder the capacity of Jews to love and be loved. When her suitor Adol’f Krants “ frees” Meri Tidman from the promise of marriage because she is forced to move to another town, she retorts, “How do you like this sincere love, which is really based on practical calculations? No Sophie, say what you will, but we Jews are created in a completely dif fer ent manner. Where other people feel, we only reason. People love with their hearts but we with our intellects.” She observes that unlike Polish Christian youth, Jews do not easily give in to romance.1 The conviction that love in a Jewish key was distinct became a concern for Jews in the Rus sian empire, with re spect to not only marriage, family, and sexuality but also religion and politics. In recent years, a small but innovative body of Jewish scholarship has contributed to the emerging field of Critical Love Studies. According to Renata Grossi and David West, scholars have been divided about the nature of love in modernity. Some have argued that modern love is a dangerous, radical, and “intrinsically subversive” force that promotes “individual autonomy and agency at the cost of disconnection from obligations deriving from family, class position, religious duty, and ethnic affiliation.”2 Others view love as an oppressive ideology that is “embedded in heterosexual
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信