注射的比较研究。罗库溴铵的起始剂量和注射。罗库溴铵对全身麻醉患者的起病、插管时间和插管条件的影响

S. Swami
{"title":"注射的比较研究。罗库溴铵的起始剂量和注射。罗库溴铵对全身麻醉患者的起病、插管时间和插管条件的影响","authors":"S. Swami","doi":"10.26611/10151924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Rocuronium is fastest among non-depolarizing muscle relaxants ,but still it produces appropriate intubating conditions comparable to succinylcholine, in >90 seconds on administering 2 × ED95 dose as a bolus dose. In present study we compared the effect of inj. Rocuronium with priming dose and inj. Rocuronium without priming on intubating conditions and onset time of intubation with respect to rocuronium as bolus. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, randomized study, conducted in patients of age groups from 18-60 years of either sex , 40-60 kgs weight, ASA grades I and II, undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia and given valid written consent for participation. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 patients each as Group C (control group) and Group P (priming group). Results: Overall, 60 patients were studied in age group of 18 to 60 years, 30 patients in each group C and group P. we compared mean age, weight, gender and ASA grade between group C and group P and difference was statistically not significant (p value >0.05). We compared mean HR, mean MAP and mean SPO2 preoperatively baseline, at induction, at intubation, mean HR at 1 minute after intubation and mean HR at 5 minute after intubation between group C and group P, the difference between two groups was statistically insignificant. (P value >.05) In group C, out of 30 patients ,17 patients were having score 9 while 12 patients were having score 8, while 1 patient had score 7 which was comparable with the group P in which out of 30 patients ,18 were having score 9,while 11 patients were having score 8 and 1 patient was of score 7,so in both groups most of the patients (96.67% in each group) had excellent intubating condition, and the groups were comparable as statistically no significant difference was noted. In group C mean Onset Time of Intubation was 92.33± 6.26 seconds, while in group P it was 56± 6.75 seconds, so the difference between the groups on the basis of OTI was statistically highly significant. (P value 0.0001) Conclusion: Rocuronium with priming would be an excellent alternative to succinylcholine, whenever fast induction will be needed. Intubating conditions were good to excellent and comparable in both rocuronium with priming and without priming. NMT monitoring is a useful tool for indicating the clinically acceptable paralysis.","PeriodicalId":18595,"journal":{"name":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of inj. Rocuronium with priming dose and inj. Rocuronium without priming with respect to onset, time of intubation and intubating conditions in patients undergoing general anaesthesia\",\"authors\":\"S. Swami\",\"doi\":\"10.26611/10151924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Rocuronium is fastest among non-depolarizing muscle relaxants ,but still it produces appropriate intubating conditions comparable to succinylcholine, in >90 seconds on administering 2 × ED95 dose as a bolus dose. In present study we compared the effect of inj. Rocuronium with priming dose and inj. Rocuronium without priming on intubating conditions and onset time of intubation with respect to rocuronium as bolus. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, randomized study, conducted in patients of age groups from 18-60 years of either sex , 40-60 kgs weight, ASA grades I and II, undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia and given valid written consent for participation. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 patients each as Group C (control group) and Group P (priming group). Results: Overall, 60 patients were studied in age group of 18 to 60 years, 30 patients in each group C and group P. we compared mean age, weight, gender and ASA grade between group C and group P and difference was statistically not significant (p value >0.05). We compared mean HR, mean MAP and mean SPO2 preoperatively baseline, at induction, at intubation, mean HR at 1 minute after intubation and mean HR at 5 minute after intubation between group C and group P, the difference between two groups was statistically insignificant. (P value >.05) In group C, out of 30 patients ,17 patients were having score 9 while 12 patients were having score 8, while 1 patient had score 7 which was comparable with the group P in which out of 30 patients ,18 were having score 9,while 11 patients were having score 8 and 1 patient was of score 7,so in both groups most of the patients (96.67% in each group) had excellent intubating condition, and the groups were comparable as statistically no significant difference was noted. In group C mean Onset Time of Intubation was 92.33± 6.26 seconds, while in group P it was 56± 6.75 seconds, so the difference between the groups on the basis of OTI was statistically highly significant. (P value 0.0001) Conclusion: Rocuronium with priming would be an excellent alternative to succinylcholine, whenever fast induction will be needed. Intubating conditions were good to excellent and comparable in both rocuronium with priming and without priming. NMT monitoring is a useful tool for indicating the clinically acceptable paralysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26611/10151924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MedPulse International Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26611/10151924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:罗库溴铵在非去极化肌肉松弛剂中是最快的,但与琥珀酰胆碱相比,在给予2 × ED95剂量时,罗库溴铵在>90秒内产生合适的插管条件。在本研究中,我们比较了注射的效果。罗库溴铵的起始剂量和注射。无灌注罗库溴铵与大剂量罗库溴铵对插管条件和插管起始时间的影响。材料和方法:本研究为单中心、前瞻性、随机研究,患者年龄为18-60岁,男女均可,体重40-60公斤,ASA分级为I级和II级,在全身麻醉下接受手术,并获得有效的书面参与同意书。将患者随机分为2组,每组30例,分别作为C组(对照组)和P组(启动组)。结果:共纳入患者60例,年龄为18 ~ 60岁,C组和P组各30例。C组与P组的平均年龄、体重、性别、ASA分级比较,差异无统计学意义(P值>0.05)。比较C组和P组的平均HR、平均MAP和平均SPO2术前基线、诱导时、插管时、插管后1分钟的平均HR和插管后5分钟的平均HR,两组间差异无统计学意义。价值(P > . 05)在C组,30例,17个病人有分数9时12患者有得分8,而1患者得分7这是可比的P组30例,18在得分9日11时患者有得分8和1患者的评分7,所以在两组大多数患者在每组(96.67%)有极好的患者条件时,和组比较统计学上无显著差异。C组平均插管起始时间为92.33±6.26秒,P组平均插管起始时间为56±6.75秒,两组间基于OTI的差异具有高度统计学意义。(P值0.0001)结论:在需要快速诱导的情况下,罗库溴铵带引物是琥珀胆碱的较好选择。罗库溴铵有起爆和无起爆两组插管条件均为好至优,具有可比性。NMT监测是一种有用的工具,用于指示临床可接受的麻痹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of inj. Rocuronium with priming dose and inj. Rocuronium without priming with respect to onset, time of intubation and intubating conditions in patients undergoing general anaesthesia
Background: Rocuronium is fastest among non-depolarizing muscle relaxants ,but still it produces appropriate intubating conditions comparable to succinylcholine, in >90 seconds on administering 2 × ED95 dose as a bolus dose. In present study we compared the effect of inj. Rocuronium with priming dose and inj. Rocuronium without priming on intubating conditions and onset time of intubation with respect to rocuronium as bolus. Material and Methods: Present study was single-center, prospective, randomized study, conducted in patients of age groups from 18-60 years of either sex , 40-60 kgs weight, ASA grades I and II, undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia and given valid written consent for participation. The patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups of 30 patients each as Group C (control group) and Group P (priming group). Results: Overall, 60 patients were studied in age group of 18 to 60 years, 30 patients in each group C and group P. we compared mean age, weight, gender and ASA grade between group C and group P and difference was statistically not significant (p value >0.05). We compared mean HR, mean MAP and mean SPO2 preoperatively baseline, at induction, at intubation, mean HR at 1 minute after intubation and mean HR at 5 minute after intubation between group C and group P, the difference between two groups was statistically insignificant. (P value >.05) In group C, out of 30 patients ,17 patients were having score 9 while 12 patients were having score 8, while 1 patient had score 7 which was comparable with the group P in which out of 30 patients ,18 were having score 9,while 11 patients were having score 8 and 1 patient was of score 7,so in both groups most of the patients (96.67% in each group) had excellent intubating condition, and the groups were comparable as statistically no significant difference was noted. In group C mean Onset Time of Intubation was 92.33± 6.26 seconds, while in group P it was 56± 6.75 seconds, so the difference between the groups on the basis of OTI was statistically highly significant. (P value 0.0001) Conclusion: Rocuronium with priming would be an excellent alternative to succinylcholine, whenever fast induction will be needed. Intubating conditions were good to excellent and comparable in both rocuronium with priming and without priming. NMT monitoring is a useful tool for indicating the clinically acceptable paralysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信