Martín Do Carmo , Lynn E. Sollenberger , Mariana Carriquiry , Pablo Soca
{"title":"控制草料用量和选择奶牛基因型可提高坎波斯草原的犊牛产量","authors":"Martín Do Carmo , Lynn E. Sollenberger , Mariana Carriquiry , Pablo Soca","doi":"10.15232/pas.2016-01600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of herbage allowance and cow genotype on herbage and animal responses. High (Hi) and Low (Lo) herbage allowance (4.9 and 2.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <span>0.14 kg of DM/kg of cattle BW, respectively) and pure (Pu, Hereford and Angus) and crossbred (Cr, F1 crosses) cow genotypes were compared in terms of herbage traits, stocking rate, cow BCS, energy intake, and calf BW at weaning during 2 cow-calf cycles (−240 to +120 d postpartum). Herbage height (5.5 vs. 3.5</span> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18 cm, mean ± SE) and herbage accumulation (15.0 vs. 12.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.1 kg of DM/ha per d) were greater (<em>P</em> > 0.01) for Hi than Lo, whereas stocking rate did not differ (<em>P</em> > 0.2) between Hi and Lo (382 vs. 398 ± 7 kg of BW/ha, respectively). Cow BCS was greater (<em>P</em> > 0.05) in Hi than Lo (4.3 vs. 3.9 ± 0.02) and in Cr than Pu cows (4.2 vs. 4.0 ± 0.04). Calf BW at weaning was greater (20 and 10 kg) for Hi than Lo and for Cr than Pu cows, but energy intake (473 vs. 455 ± 4.6 kJ/kg of BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d) was greater (<em>P</em> > 0.05), only in Hi compared with Lo cows. Modeling BCS evolution during the cow-calf cycle confirmed that Hi herbage allowance and Cr cows improved energy balance and cow-calf biological efficiency. This information can be used to improve profitability and mitigate weather variability effects on Campos grassland livestock systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 1","pages":"Pages 32-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2016-01600","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controlling herbage allowance and selection of cow genotype improve cow-calf productivity in Campos grasslands\",\"authors\":\"Martín Do Carmo , Lynn E. Sollenberger , Mariana Carriquiry , Pablo Soca\",\"doi\":\"10.15232/pas.2016-01600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of herbage allowance and cow genotype on herbage and animal responses. High (Hi) and Low (Lo) herbage allowance (4.9 and 2.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <span>0.14 kg of DM/kg of cattle BW, respectively) and pure (Pu, Hereford and Angus) and crossbred (Cr, F1 crosses) cow genotypes were compared in terms of herbage traits, stocking rate, cow BCS, energy intake, and calf BW at weaning during 2 cow-calf cycles (−240 to +120 d postpartum). Herbage height (5.5 vs. 3.5</span> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.18 cm, mean ± SE) and herbage accumulation (15.0 vs. 12.5<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->1.1 kg of DM/ha per d) were greater (<em>P</em> > 0.01) for Hi than Lo, whereas stocking rate did not differ (<em>P</em> > 0.2) between Hi and Lo (382 vs. 398 ± 7 kg of BW/ha, respectively). Cow BCS was greater (<em>P</em> > 0.05) in Hi than Lo (4.3 vs. 3.9 ± 0.02) and in Cr than Pu cows (4.2 vs. 4.0 ± 0.04). Calf BW at weaning was greater (20 and 10 kg) for Hi than Lo and for Cr than Pu cows, but energy intake (473 vs. 455 ± 4.6 kJ/kg of BW<sup>0.75</sup> per d) was greater (<em>P</em> > 0.05), only in Hi compared with Lo cows. Modeling BCS evolution during the cow-calf cycle confirmed that Hi herbage allowance and Cr cows improved energy balance and cow-calf biological efficiency. This information can be used to improve profitability and mitigate weather variability effects on Campos grassland livestock systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 32-41\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2016-01600\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Professional Animal Scientist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
摘要
通过试验研究了牧草用量和奶牛基因型对牧草和动物反应的影响。在2个奶牛-犊牛周期(产后- 240 ~ +120 d)内,比较高(Hi)和低(Lo)草料供量(分别为4.9和2.9±0.14 kg DM/kg牛体重)、纯(普、赫里福德和安格斯)和杂交(Cr、F1杂交)牛基因型的草料性状、载畜率、奶牛BCS、能量摄入和断奶犊牛体重。牧草高度(5.5比3.5±0.18 cm,平均±SE)和牧草积累量(15.0比12.5±1.1 kg DM/ha / d)更大(P >0.01),载畜率差异不显著(P >0.2)(分别为382 vs 398±7 kg BW/ha)。母牛BCS更大(P >Hi奶牛比Lo奶牛(4.3 vs. 3.9±0.02),Cr奶牛比Pu奶牛(4.2 vs. 4.0±0.04)。Hi组犊牛断奶体重(20和10 kg)高于Lo组,Cr组高于Pu组,但能量摄入(473 vs 455±4.6 kJ/kg BW0.75 / d)更高(P >0.05),只有Hi奶牛与Lo奶牛比较。通过模拟奶牛-犊牛周期BCS的演化,证实高草料和高铬奶牛改善了能量平衡和犊牛生物效率。这些信息可用于提高盈利能力和减轻天气变化对坎波斯草原牲畜系统的影响。
Controlling herbage allowance and selection of cow genotype improve cow-calf productivity in Campos grasslands
An experiment was conducted to determine the effect of herbage allowance and cow genotype on herbage and animal responses. High (Hi) and Low (Lo) herbage allowance (4.9 and 2.9 ± 0.14 kg of DM/kg of cattle BW, respectively) and pure (Pu, Hereford and Angus) and crossbred (Cr, F1 crosses) cow genotypes were compared in terms of herbage traits, stocking rate, cow BCS, energy intake, and calf BW at weaning during 2 cow-calf cycles (−240 to +120 d postpartum). Herbage height (5.5 vs. 3.5 ± 0.18 cm, mean ± SE) and herbage accumulation (15.0 vs. 12.5 ± 1.1 kg of DM/ha per d) were greater (P > 0.01) for Hi than Lo, whereas stocking rate did not differ (P > 0.2) between Hi and Lo (382 vs. 398 ± 7 kg of BW/ha, respectively). Cow BCS was greater (P > 0.05) in Hi than Lo (4.3 vs. 3.9 ± 0.02) and in Cr than Pu cows (4.2 vs. 4.0 ± 0.04). Calf BW at weaning was greater (20 and 10 kg) for Hi than Lo and for Cr than Pu cows, but energy intake (473 vs. 455 ± 4.6 kJ/kg of BW0.75 per d) was greater (P > 0.05), only in Hi compared with Lo cows. Modeling BCS evolution during the cow-calf cycle confirmed that Hi herbage allowance and Cr cows improved energy balance and cow-calf biological efficiency. This information can be used to improve profitability and mitigate weather variability effects on Campos grassland livestock systems.