尼日利亚气候变化诉讼的未来:COPW诉NNPC的焦点

Q3 Social Sciences
U. Etemire
{"title":"尼日利亚气候变化诉讼的未来:COPW诉NNPC的焦点","authors":"U. Etemire","doi":"10.21552/cclr/2021/2/7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Africa is vulnerable to the effects of climate change. While some African states have contributed very little to the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions driving climate change, others are heavier polluters. Over many decades, Nigeria’s oil and gas industry and the gas flaring for which it is notorious, has significantly contributed to the global rise of GHGs. The country is already experiencing the adverse effects of climate change in term of increasing cases of droughts, sea-level rise, acid precipitation and floods, among others. Global climate litigation has foregrounded the potential contributions which a national court can make in regulating the human activities that fuel climate change and undermine mitigation and adaptation efforts. Against this backdrop, this paper will assess the current status of climate change litigation in Nigeria. The paper argues that climate change litigation in Nigeria is still in its infancy. However, it will critically assess the paradigm shifts evident in the decision of the Nigerian Supreme Court in the recent case of Centre for Oil Pollution Watch (COPW) v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), arguing that this case potentially clears the way for future climate change litigation in Nigeria.","PeriodicalId":52307,"journal":{"name":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Climate Change Litigation in Nigeria: COPW v NNPC in the Spotlight\",\"authors\":\"U. Etemire\",\"doi\":\"10.21552/cclr/2021/2/7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Africa is vulnerable to the effects of climate change. While some African states have contributed very little to the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions driving climate change, others are heavier polluters. Over many decades, Nigeria’s oil and gas industry and the gas flaring for which it is notorious, has significantly contributed to the global rise of GHGs. The country is already experiencing the adverse effects of climate change in term of increasing cases of droughts, sea-level rise, acid precipitation and floods, among others. Global climate litigation has foregrounded the potential contributions which a national court can make in regulating the human activities that fuel climate change and undermine mitigation and adaptation efforts. Against this backdrop, this paper will assess the current status of climate change litigation in Nigeria. The paper argues that climate change litigation in Nigeria is still in its infancy. However, it will critically assess the paradigm shifts evident in the decision of the Nigerian Supreme Court in the recent case of Centre for Oil Pollution Watch (COPW) v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), arguing that this case potentially clears the way for future climate change litigation in Nigeria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52307,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Carbon and Climate Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/2/7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Carbon and Climate Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/2/7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

非洲很容易受到气候变化的影响。虽然一些非洲国家对推动气候变化的全球温室气体(GHG)排放的贡献很小,但其他国家则是更严重的污染者。几十年来,尼日利亚的石油和天然气工业及其臭名昭著的天然气燃烧对全球温室气体的增加做出了重大贡献。这个国家已经经历了气候变化的不利影响,干旱、海平面上升、酸雨和洪水等事件不断增加。全球气候诉讼突出了国家法院在调节助长气候变化和破坏减缓和适应努力的人类活动方面可以作出的潜在贡献。在此背景下,本文将评估尼日利亚气候变化诉讼的现状。该论文认为,尼日利亚的气候变化诉讼仍处于起步阶段。然而,它将批判性地评估尼日利亚最高法院在最近的石油污染观察中心(COPW)诉尼日利亚国家石油公司(NNPC)一案中的判决中明显的范式转变,认为该案件可能为尼日利亚未来的气候变化诉讼扫清道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future of Climate Change Litigation in Nigeria: COPW v NNPC in the Spotlight
Africa is vulnerable to the effects of climate change. While some African states have contributed very little to the global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions driving climate change, others are heavier polluters. Over many decades, Nigeria’s oil and gas industry and the gas flaring for which it is notorious, has significantly contributed to the global rise of GHGs. The country is already experiencing the adverse effects of climate change in term of increasing cases of droughts, sea-level rise, acid precipitation and floods, among others. Global climate litigation has foregrounded the potential contributions which a national court can make in regulating the human activities that fuel climate change and undermine mitigation and adaptation efforts. Against this backdrop, this paper will assess the current status of climate change litigation in Nigeria. The paper argues that climate change litigation in Nigeria is still in its infancy. However, it will critically assess the paradigm shifts evident in the decision of the Nigerian Supreme Court in the recent case of Centre for Oil Pollution Watch (COPW) v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC), arguing that this case potentially clears the way for future climate change litigation in Nigeria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Carbon and Climate Law Review
Carbon and Climate Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信