供水管网优化设计的模糊聚类分析及决策算法

K. Srinivasa Raju, Vasan Arunachalam, M. N. Naidu
{"title":"供水管网优化设计的模糊聚类分析及决策算法","authors":"K. Srinivasa Raju, Vasan Arunachalam, M. N. Naidu","doi":"10.1080/09715010.2022.2076573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Three objectives, maximization of resilience, minimization of cost, and minimization of leakages, were considered in the Water Distribution Network (WDN) framework for a benchmark problem of Hanoi WDN and a real-world problem, Pamapur WDN, Telangana, India. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is employed to generate Non-dominated WDN Strategies (NWDNS). In order to simplify the decision-making process of engineers, Fuzzy Cluster Analysis (FCA) is employed to categorize NWDNS into groups. An optimum number of clusters are based on the Elbow method. Representative NWDNS, i.e. RNWDNS for each sub-cluster, is based on the membership values. Ranking of RNWDNS is performed with two decision-making algorithms, namely, Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations-2 (PROMETHEE-2) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The additive ranking rule is also applied to obtain ranks in a group decision-making environment to arrive at the optimal WDN. It is observed that 1020 NWDNSH (H represents Hanoi) generated for the Hanoi are optimally classified into 18 clusters based on the Elbow method, and A13 representing RNWDNSH 37 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 7.8818 × 106 $, 0.3194, 0.2024 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferable, respectively. Whereas 272 NWDNSP (P represents Pamapur) generated for the Pamapur are classified into 9 clusters where S6 representing RNWDNSP 203 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 3.5159 × 106 Rs., 0.8367, 0.5317 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferred, respectively. The present study facilitated seamless integration of NSGA-II (generation of Pareto front), FCA (reducing to manageable set) and MCDM methods (to rank the reduced manageable set) in a robust manner. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":38206,"journal":{"name":"ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","volume":"158 1","pages":"341 - 350"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy cluster analysis and decision-making algorithms for optimal water distribution network design\",\"authors\":\"K. Srinivasa Raju, Vasan Arunachalam, M. N. Naidu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09715010.2022.2076573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Three objectives, maximization of resilience, minimization of cost, and minimization of leakages, were considered in the Water Distribution Network (WDN) framework for a benchmark problem of Hanoi WDN and a real-world problem, Pamapur WDN, Telangana, India. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is employed to generate Non-dominated WDN Strategies (NWDNS). In order to simplify the decision-making process of engineers, Fuzzy Cluster Analysis (FCA) is employed to categorize NWDNS into groups. An optimum number of clusters are based on the Elbow method. Representative NWDNS, i.e. RNWDNS for each sub-cluster, is based on the membership values. Ranking of RNWDNS is performed with two decision-making algorithms, namely, Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations-2 (PROMETHEE-2) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The additive ranking rule is also applied to obtain ranks in a group decision-making environment to arrive at the optimal WDN. It is observed that 1020 NWDNSH (H represents Hanoi) generated for the Hanoi are optimally classified into 18 clusters based on the Elbow method, and A13 representing RNWDNSH 37 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 7.8818 × 106 $, 0.3194, 0.2024 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferable, respectively. Whereas 272 NWDNSP (P represents Pamapur) generated for the Pamapur are classified into 9 clusters where S6 representing RNWDNSP 203 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 3.5159 × 106 Rs., 0.8367, 0.5317 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferred, respectively. The present study facilitated seamless integration of NSGA-II (generation of Pareto front), FCA (reducing to manageable set) and MCDM methods (to rank the reduced manageable set) in a robust manner. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":38206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"341 - 350\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2022.2076573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2022.2076573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在配水网络(WDN)框架中,针对河内配水网络的基准问题和印度特伦甘纳邦帕玛普尔配水网络的现实问题,考虑了三个目标:弹性最大化、成本最小化和泄漏最小化。采用非支配排序遗传算法- ii (NSGA-II)生成非支配WDN策略(NWDNS)。为了简化工程师的决策过程,采用模糊聚类分析(FCA)对nwdn进行分组。基于肘部法得到最佳簇数。代表性NWDNS,即每个子集群的RNWDNS,是基于成员值的。采用两种决策算法对RNWDNS进行排序,即promeee -2和VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR)。在群体决策环境下,应用加性排序规则进行排序,得到最优WDN。研究发现,基于肘部法,河内市生成的1020个NWDNSH (H代表河内市)被最优地划分为18个簇,其中A13代表RNWDNSH 37(成本、弹性和泄漏分别为7.8818 × 106 $、0.3194、0.2024 × 10−3 m3/s)更优。而为Pamapur生成的272个NWDNSP (P代表Pamapur)被分为9个簇,其中S6代表RNWDNSP 203(成本、弹性和泄漏分别为3.5159 × 106 Rs、0.8367、0.5317 × 10−3 m3/s)是首选。本研究以稳健的方式促进了NSGA-II (Pareto front的生成)、FCA(减少到可管理集)和MCDM方法(对减少的可管理集进行排序)的无缝集成。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy cluster analysis and decision-making algorithms for optimal water distribution network design
ABSTRACT Three objectives, maximization of resilience, minimization of cost, and minimization of leakages, were considered in the Water Distribution Network (WDN) framework for a benchmark problem of Hanoi WDN and a real-world problem, Pamapur WDN, Telangana, India. Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) is employed to generate Non-dominated WDN Strategies (NWDNS). In order to simplify the decision-making process of engineers, Fuzzy Cluster Analysis (FCA) is employed to categorize NWDNS into groups. An optimum number of clusters are based on the Elbow method. Representative NWDNS, i.e. RNWDNS for each sub-cluster, is based on the membership values. Ranking of RNWDNS is performed with two decision-making algorithms, namely, Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment of Evaluations-2 (PROMETHEE-2) and VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR). The additive ranking rule is also applied to obtain ranks in a group decision-making environment to arrive at the optimal WDN. It is observed that 1020 NWDNSH (H represents Hanoi) generated for the Hanoi are optimally classified into 18 clusters based on the Elbow method, and A13 representing RNWDNSH 37 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 7.8818 × 106 $, 0.3194, 0.2024 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferable, respectively. Whereas 272 NWDNSP (P represents Pamapur) generated for the Pamapur are classified into 9 clusters where S6 representing RNWDNSP 203 (cost, resilience, and leakages, respectively, are 3.5159 × 106 Rs., 0.8367, 0.5317 × 10−3 m3/s) is preferred, respectively. The present study facilitated seamless integration of NSGA-II (generation of Pareto front), FCA (reducing to manageable set) and MCDM methods (to rank the reduced manageable set) in a robust manner. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信