第三方移动支付提供商的生态系统视角——以支付宝钱包为例

Jie Guo, Jie Guo, H. Bouwman
{"title":"第三方移动支付提供商的生态系统视角——以支付宝钱包为例","authors":"Jie Guo, Jie Guo, H. Bouwman","doi":"10.1108/INFO-01-2016-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nTo understand why the penetration of handset-based mobile payment in most countries is still low has been an important research topic for the last 15 years, and it has been analyzed from different perspectives. However, the analysis of a single aspect cannot provide a sophisticated answer to the complicated underlying question. The purpose of this paper is to understand how a relatively successful m-payment ecosystem is created and sustained through the coopetition of various actors. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nTo that end, the authors analyze the case of Alipay wallet, the m-payment service provider with the largest market share in China, and focus on understanding the motivations and subsequent actions of the organizations cooperating in the Alipay wallet core ecosystem. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThe results show that actors with heterogeneous and complementary resources can forge sustainable collaboration. Within an ecosystem, although always constrained by resources and capabilities, the actions that the core actors take and the resulting power imbalances are dynamically changing, reflecting actors’ aim of reducing uncertainty. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nThe main limitation of this case is that it was conducted in a Chinese context, which has specific features that may not apply to other cases. In addition, this study is based on a single case study in a single country, without comparing the results to any other cases or countries. Therefore, some modifications may have to be made when applying the framework and generalizing the results. \n \n \n \n \nPractical implications \n \n \n \n \nWith regards to the practical perspective, the Alipay case may serve as an example that other providers follow, taking similar actions to increase the dependency of others and reduce their own dependency on others. It is helpful to take a keystone strategy to create value within the ecosystem and share this value with other participants. Moreover, Alipay acts as the platform provider, in addition to managing value creation within the ecosystem and sharing that value with the other participants. Alipay focuses on the business and strategic needs of the core actors, without threatening their main business, for example, Alipay focuses on micro-payments, which does not pose a direct competition to banks, who mainly rely on macro-payments to generate profit. Micro-payments are often related to high transaction costs for banks. In addition, although it is difficult to define the boundaries of actors in the ecosystem, the core business of every actor is the key competitive or even survival condition. This notion should be taken into consideration by actors whose actions affect the business of other ecosystem partners. For instance, Alipay will not aim to become a bank, as they know that if they do so, they cannot connect any other bank to their platform. In other words, the scope and boundary of the actors are clearly identified so that the core business will not be threatened. Sords, we can learn from Alipay that it pays off to focus on one area, and not to let your competitors challenge you. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nThe authors proposed the StReS framework for analyzing a business ecosystem by combining resource-based review, resource dependency theories and network analysis for investigating the motivations of the organizations cooperating in the core ecosystem and the actions they have taken to reduce dependency and uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":88488,"journal":{"name":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","volume":"67 6 1","pages":"56-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An ecosystem view on third party mobile payment providers: a case study of Alipay wallet\",\"authors\":\"Jie Guo, Jie Guo, H. Bouwman\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/INFO-01-2016-0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nTo understand why the penetration of handset-based mobile payment in most countries is still low has been an important research topic for the last 15 years, and it has been analyzed from different perspectives. However, the analysis of a single aspect cannot provide a sophisticated answer to the complicated underlying question. The purpose of this paper is to understand how a relatively successful m-payment ecosystem is created and sustained through the coopetition of various actors. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nDesign/methodology/approach \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nTo that end, the authors analyze the case of Alipay wallet, the m-payment service provider with the largest market share in China, and focus on understanding the motivations and subsequent actions of the organizations cooperating in the Alipay wallet core ecosystem. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nFindings \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe results show that actors with heterogeneous and complementary resources can forge sustainable collaboration. Within an ecosystem, although always constrained by resources and capabilities, the actions that the core actors take and the resulting power imbalances are dynamically changing, reflecting actors’ aim of reducing uncertainty. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nResearch limitations/implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe main limitation of this case is that it was conducted in a Chinese context, which has specific features that may not apply to other cases. In addition, this study is based on a single case study in a single country, without comparing the results to any other cases or countries. Therefore, some modifications may have to be made when applying the framework and generalizing the results. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nPractical implications \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nWith regards to the practical perspective, the Alipay case may serve as an example that other providers follow, taking similar actions to increase the dependency of others and reduce their own dependency on others. It is helpful to take a keystone strategy to create value within the ecosystem and share this value with other participants. Moreover, Alipay acts as the platform provider, in addition to managing value creation within the ecosystem and sharing that value with the other participants. Alipay focuses on the business and strategic needs of the core actors, without threatening their main business, for example, Alipay focuses on micro-payments, which does not pose a direct competition to banks, who mainly rely on macro-payments to generate profit. Micro-payments are often related to high transaction costs for banks. In addition, although it is difficult to define the boundaries of actors in the ecosystem, the core business of every actor is the key competitive or even survival condition. This notion should be taken into consideration by actors whose actions affect the business of other ecosystem partners. For instance, Alipay will not aim to become a bank, as they know that if they do so, they cannot connect any other bank to their platform. In other words, the scope and boundary of the actors are clearly identified so that the core business will not be threatened. Sords, we can learn from Alipay that it pays off to focus on one area, and not to let your competitors challenge you. \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nOriginality/value \\n \\n \\n \\n \\nThe authors proposed the StReS framework for analyzing a business ecosystem by combining resource-based review, resource dependency theories and network analysis for investigating the motivations of the organizations cooperating in the core ecosystem and the actions they have taken to reduce dependency and uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"volume\":\"67 6 1\",\"pages\":\"56-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"46\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fruhneuzeit-Info\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-01-2016-0003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-01-2016-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

摘要

了解为什么大多数国家基于手机的移动支付的渗透率仍然很低,这是过去15年的一个重要研究课题,并从不同的角度进行了分析。然而,对单个方面的分析不能为复杂的潜在问题提供复杂的答案。本文的目的是了解一个相对成功的移动支付生态系统是如何通过各种参与者的合作来创建和维持的。为此,作者分析了支付宝钱包——中国市场份额最大的移动支付服务提供商的案例,并重点了解支付宝钱包核心生态系统中合作组织的动机和后续行动。结果表明,资源异质互补的行为体能够形成可持续的合作关系。在生态系统中,虽然总是受到资源和能力的限制,但核心参与者采取的行动和由此产生的权力不平衡是动态变化的,反映了参与者减少不确定性的目标。研究局限/启示本案例的主要局限在于它是在中国背景下进行的,这具有可能不适用于其他案例的特定特征。此外,本研究基于单一国家的单一案例研究,没有将结果与任何其他案例或国家进行比较。因此,在应用框架和推广结果时,可能需要进行一些修改。从实践的角度来看,支付宝的案例可以作为其他提供商效仿的榜样,采取类似的行动,增加对他人的依赖,减少自己对他人的依赖。采取关键战略,在生态系统中创造价值,并与其他参与者分享这一价值,是有帮助的。此外,支付宝除了管理生态系统内的价值创造并与其他参与者分享价值外,还充当了平台提供商的角色。支付宝关注核心行为者的业务和战略需求,不会威胁到核心行为者的主营业务,例如支付宝关注小额支付,不会对银行构成直接竞争,银行主要依靠宏观支付来产生利润。小额支付通常与银行的高交易成本有关。此外,虽然很难界定生态系统中参与者的边界,但每个参与者的核心业务是关键的竞争甚至生存条件。如果参与者的行为影响到其他生态系统伙伴的业务,他们应该考虑这个概念。例如,支付宝不会以成为银行为目标,因为他们知道,如果这样做,他们就无法将任何其他银行连接到他们的平台上。换句话说,明确参与者的范围和边界,使核心业务不会受到威胁。总之,我们可以从支付宝身上学到,专注于一个领域是值得的,不要让你的竞争对手挑战你。作者将资源基础评价、资源依赖理论和网络分析相结合,提出了分析商业生态系统的应力分析框架,以考察核心生态系统中合作组织的动机以及他们为减少依赖和不确定性所采取的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An ecosystem view on third party mobile payment providers: a case study of Alipay wallet
Purpose To understand why the penetration of handset-based mobile payment in most countries is still low has been an important research topic for the last 15 years, and it has been analyzed from different perspectives. However, the analysis of a single aspect cannot provide a sophisticated answer to the complicated underlying question. The purpose of this paper is to understand how a relatively successful m-payment ecosystem is created and sustained through the coopetition of various actors. Design/methodology/approach To that end, the authors analyze the case of Alipay wallet, the m-payment service provider with the largest market share in China, and focus on understanding the motivations and subsequent actions of the organizations cooperating in the Alipay wallet core ecosystem. Findings The results show that actors with heterogeneous and complementary resources can forge sustainable collaboration. Within an ecosystem, although always constrained by resources and capabilities, the actions that the core actors take and the resulting power imbalances are dynamically changing, reflecting actors’ aim of reducing uncertainty. Research limitations/implications The main limitation of this case is that it was conducted in a Chinese context, which has specific features that may not apply to other cases. In addition, this study is based on a single case study in a single country, without comparing the results to any other cases or countries. Therefore, some modifications may have to be made when applying the framework and generalizing the results. Practical implications With regards to the practical perspective, the Alipay case may serve as an example that other providers follow, taking similar actions to increase the dependency of others and reduce their own dependency on others. It is helpful to take a keystone strategy to create value within the ecosystem and share this value with other participants. Moreover, Alipay acts as the platform provider, in addition to managing value creation within the ecosystem and sharing that value with the other participants. Alipay focuses on the business and strategic needs of the core actors, without threatening their main business, for example, Alipay focuses on micro-payments, which does not pose a direct competition to banks, who mainly rely on macro-payments to generate profit. Micro-payments are often related to high transaction costs for banks. In addition, although it is difficult to define the boundaries of actors in the ecosystem, the core business of every actor is the key competitive or even survival condition. This notion should be taken into consideration by actors whose actions affect the business of other ecosystem partners. For instance, Alipay will not aim to become a bank, as they know that if they do so, they cannot connect any other bank to their platform. In other words, the scope and boundary of the actors are clearly identified so that the core business will not be threatened. Sords, we can learn from Alipay that it pays off to focus on one area, and not to let your competitors challenge you. Originality/value The authors proposed the StReS framework for analyzing a business ecosystem by combining resource-based review, resource dependency theories and network analysis for investigating the motivations of the organizations cooperating in the core ecosystem and the actions they have taken to reduce dependency and uncertainty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信