高海拔草原牧场土壤健康、饲料质量与放牧能力的关系

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Timmothy M. Gergeni, J. Scasta, Kristie A. Maczko, J. Tanaka
{"title":"高海拔草原牧场土壤健康、饲料质量与放牧能力的关系","authors":"Timmothy M. Gergeni, J. Scasta, Kristie A. Maczko, J. Tanaka","doi":"10.1080/15324982.2022.2114117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The sustainability of rangeland grazing enterprises hinges on healthy and functioning soil resources. Yet information about how rangeland soil features influence livestock production has lagged relative to agronomic crop production. We established a ranch-scale assessment in Wyoming, USA to better understand soil health and livestock production. We integrated 26 years of animal day per hectare grazing records to relate livestock production to pasture-scale soil characteristics. In 2017, we measured 23 soil variables, and 11 forage variables (for Pascopyrum smithii) of 11 grazed pastures from 68 to 146 ha and three ungrazed exclosures. Pastures were stratified across animal day pasture categories (“Low,” “Medium,” “High,” and “None” or exclosure; considered a carrying capacity index). Significant relationships were found between nine of the 23 soil response variables but only one of the 11 forage response variables relative to the animal day pasture categories. Statistical analysis indicated significantly higher % soil organic carbon and forage lignin in the High animal day pasture category relative to the Low Animal Day pasture category (both p-values <0.05). No significant relationship was found between the Animal Day pasture category and forage crude protein (p = 0.3). The principal component analysis explained 98.22% (cumulative for the first two axes) of the variation of the soil health variables but was less insightful for forage quality variables (71.1% of variation explained). Soil organic carbon is a suitable indicator of animal days in pasture and may serve as a useful rangeland soil health indicator for livestock producers.","PeriodicalId":8380,"journal":{"name":"Arid Land Research and Management","volume":"81 1","pages":"155 - 183"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranch-scale soil health, forage quality, and cattle grazing capacity linkages in a high-elevation steppe\",\"authors\":\"Timmothy M. Gergeni, J. Scasta, Kristie A. Maczko, J. Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15324982.2022.2114117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The sustainability of rangeland grazing enterprises hinges on healthy and functioning soil resources. Yet information about how rangeland soil features influence livestock production has lagged relative to agronomic crop production. We established a ranch-scale assessment in Wyoming, USA to better understand soil health and livestock production. We integrated 26 years of animal day per hectare grazing records to relate livestock production to pasture-scale soil characteristics. In 2017, we measured 23 soil variables, and 11 forage variables (for Pascopyrum smithii) of 11 grazed pastures from 68 to 146 ha and three ungrazed exclosures. Pastures were stratified across animal day pasture categories (“Low,” “Medium,” “High,” and “None” or exclosure; considered a carrying capacity index). Significant relationships were found between nine of the 23 soil response variables but only one of the 11 forage response variables relative to the animal day pasture categories. Statistical analysis indicated significantly higher % soil organic carbon and forage lignin in the High animal day pasture category relative to the Low Animal Day pasture category (both p-values <0.05). No significant relationship was found between the Animal Day pasture category and forage crude protein (p = 0.3). The principal component analysis explained 98.22% (cumulative for the first two axes) of the variation of the soil health variables but was less insightful for forage quality variables (71.1% of variation explained). Soil organic carbon is a suitable indicator of animal days in pasture and may serve as a useful rangeland soil health indicator for livestock producers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arid Land Research and Management\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 183\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arid Land Research and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2022.2114117\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arid Land Research and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15324982.2022.2114117","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

草地放牧企业的可持续发展取决于土壤资源的健康和功能。然而,与农业作物生产相比,关于牧场土壤特征如何影响牲畜生产的信息相对滞后。我们在美国怀俄明州建立了一个牧场规模的评估,以更好地了解土壤健康和牲畜生产。我们整合了26年的每公顷放牧动物日数记录,将牲畜生产与牧场规模的土壤特征联系起来。2017年,我们测量了11个68 - 146公顷的放牧牧场和3个未放牧的圈闭牧场的23个土壤变量和11个饲料变量(对于Pascopyrum smithii)。牧场按动物日牧场类别分层(“低”、“中”、“高”和“无”或封闭;被认为是承载能力指数)。23个土壤响应变量中有9个与动物日牧场类有显著相关,11个牧草响应变量中只有1个与动物日牧场类有显著相关。统计分析表明,高畜禽日放牧区土壤有机碳和牧草木质素显著高于低畜禽日放牧区(p值均<0.05)。放牧日牧草种类与饲料粗蛋白质之间无显著相关(p = 0.3)。主成分分析解释了土壤健康变量变异的98.22%(前两个轴的累积),但对饲料质量变量的解释较差(解释变异的71.1%)。土壤有机碳是一个适宜的牧场动物日数指标,可作为一个有用的牧场土壤健康指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranch-scale soil health, forage quality, and cattle grazing capacity linkages in a high-elevation steppe
Abstract The sustainability of rangeland grazing enterprises hinges on healthy and functioning soil resources. Yet information about how rangeland soil features influence livestock production has lagged relative to agronomic crop production. We established a ranch-scale assessment in Wyoming, USA to better understand soil health and livestock production. We integrated 26 years of animal day per hectare grazing records to relate livestock production to pasture-scale soil characteristics. In 2017, we measured 23 soil variables, and 11 forage variables (for Pascopyrum smithii) of 11 grazed pastures from 68 to 146 ha and three ungrazed exclosures. Pastures were stratified across animal day pasture categories (“Low,” “Medium,” “High,” and “None” or exclosure; considered a carrying capacity index). Significant relationships were found between nine of the 23 soil response variables but only one of the 11 forage response variables relative to the animal day pasture categories. Statistical analysis indicated significantly higher % soil organic carbon and forage lignin in the High animal day pasture category relative to the Low Animal Day pasture category (both p-values <0.05). No significant relationship was found between the Animal Day pasture category and forage crude protein (p = 0.3). The principal component analysis explained 98.22% (cumulative for the first two axes) of the variation of the soil health variables but was less insightful for forage quality variables (71.1% of variation explained). Soil organic carbon is a suitable indicator of animal days in pasture and may serve as a useful rangeland soil health indicator for livestock producers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arid Land Research and Management
Arid Land Research and Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Arid Land Research and Management, a cooperating journal of the International Union of Soil Sciences , is a common outlet and a valuable source of information for fundamental and applied research on soils affected by aridity. This journal covers land ecology, including flora and fauna, as well as soil chemistry, biology, physics, and other edaphic aspects. The journal emphasizes recovery of degraded lands and practical, appropriate uses of soils. Reports of biotechnological applications to land use and recovery are included. Full papers and short notes, as well as review articles and book and meeting reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信