学习规则:书写和研究教育史上的学校故事

IF 0.6 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Stephanie Spencer
{"title":"学习规则:书写和研究教育史上的学校故事","authors":"Stephanie Spencer","doi":"10.1108/HER-04-2017-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to set out three dilemmas that challenge historians of education who write for both professional and academic audiences. It focuses on the example of using fiction as a source for understanding the informal education of girls in the twentieth century. It contributes to the debate over the purpose of history of education and the possibilities that intersecting and contested analytical frameworks might contribute to the development of the discipline.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper discusses the rules of engagement and the duties of a historian of education. It reforms current concerns into three dilemmas: audience, method and writing. It gives examples drawn from research into girls’ school stories between 1910 and 1960. It highlights three authors and stories set in Australia, England and an international school in order to explore what fiction offers in getting “inside” the classroom.\n\n\nFindings\nDeveloped from a conference keynote that explored intersecting and contested histories of education, the paper sets up as many questions as it provides answers but re-frames them to include the use of a genre that has been explored by historians of childhood and literature but less so by historians of education.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe vast quantity of stories set in girls’ schools between 1910 and 1960 necessarily demands a selective reading. Authors may specialise in the genre or be general young people’s fiction authors. Reading such stories must necessarily be set against changing social, cultural and political contexts. This paper uses examples from the genre in order to explore ways forward but cannot include an exhaustive methodology for reasons of space.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThis paper suggests fiction as a way of broadening the remit of history of education and acting as a bridge between related sub-disciplines such as history of childhood and youth, history and education. It raises practical implications for historians of education as they seek new approaches and understanding of the process of informal education outside the classroom.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper suggests that the authors should take more seriously the impact of children’s reading for pleasure. Reception studies offer an insight into recognising the interaction that children have with their chosen reading. While the authors cannot research how children interacted historically with these stories in the mid-twentieth century, the authors can draw implications from the popularity of the genre and the significance of the legacy of the closed school community that has made series such as Harry Potter so successful with the current generation.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe marginal place of history of education within the disciplines of history and education is both challenging and full of possibilities. The paper draws on existing international debates and discusses future directions as well as the potential that girls’ school stories offer for research into gender and education.\n","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning the rules: writing and researching school stories in history of education\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Spencer\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HER-04-2017-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to set out three dilemmas that challenge historians of education who write for both professional and academic audiences. It focuses on the example of using fiction as a source for understanding the informal education of girls in the twentieth century. It contributes to the debate over the purpose of history of education and the possibilities that intersecting and contested analytical frameworks might contribute to the development of the discipline.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe paper discusses the rules of engagement and the duties of a historian of education. It reforms current concerns into three dilemmas: audience, method and writing. It gives examples drawn from research into girls’ school stories between 1910 and 1960. It highlights three authors and stories set in Australia, England and an international school in order to explore what fiction offers in getting “inside” the classroom.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nDeveloped from a conference keynote that explored intersecting and contested histories of education, the paper sets up as many questions as it provides answers but re-frames them to include the use of a genre that has been explored by historians of childhood and literature but less so by historians of education.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe vast quantity of stories set in girls’ schools between 1910 and 1960 necessarily demands a selective reading. Authors may specialise in the genre or be general young people’s fiction authors. Reading such stories must necessarily be set against changing social, cultural and political contexts. This paper uses examples from the genre in order to explore ways forward but cannot include an exhaustive methodology for reasons of space.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThis paper suggests fiction as a way of broadening the remit of history of education and acting as a bridge between related sub-disciplines such as history of childhood and youth, history and education. It raises practical implications for historians of education as they seek new approaches and understanding of the process of informal education outside the classroom.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper suggests that the authors should take more seriously the impact of children’s reading for pleasure. Reception studies offer an insight into recognising the interaction that children have with their chosen reading. While the authors cannot research how children interacted historically with these stories in the mid-twentieth century, the authors can draw implications from the popularity of the genre and the significance of the legacy of the closed school community that has made series such as Harry Potter so successful with the current generation.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe marginal place of history of education within the disciplines of history and education is both challenging and full of possibilities. The paper draws on existing international debates and discusses future directions as well as the potential that girls’ school stories offer for research into gender and education.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Education Review\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-04-2017-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HER-04-2017-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文的目的是阐明教育历史学家在为专业读者和学术读者写作时所面临的三个困境。它侧重于使用小说作为理解二十世纪女孩非正式教育的来源的例子。它有助于对教育史目的的辩论,以及交叉和有争议的分析框架可能有助于学科发展的可能性。设计/方法/方法本文讨论了参与的规则和教育历史学家的职责。它将当前的关注转变为三个困境:受众、方法和写作。它给出了从1910年到1960年间对女子学校故事的研究中提取的例子。它重点介绍了三位作家和故事,背景分别是澳大利亚、英国和一所国际学校,目的是探索小说在“走进”课堂方面提供了什么。这篇论文的发现源于一次会议的主题演讲,该主题演讲探讨了相互交叉的、有争议的教育史,它提出了尽可能多的问题,并提供了答案,但重新构建了这些问题,以包括使用一种体裁,这种体裁已经被儿童和文学历史学家探索过,但教育历史学家却很少探索。研究局限/启示1910年至1960年间以女子学校为背景的大量故事必然需要选择性阅读。作者可能专攻这一类型,也可能是一般的年轻人小说作家。阅读这样的故事,必须以不断变化的社会、文化和政治背景为背景。本文使用了该类型的例子来探索前进的道路,但由于篇幅的原因,不能包含详尽的方法。本文认为,小说可以拓宽教育史的研究范围,并在儿童与青少年史、历史与教育等相关分支学科之间架起一座桥梁。它为教育历史学家寻求新的方法和对课堂外非正式教育过程的理解提出了实际意义。社会影响这篇论文建议作者们应该更加重视儿童为乐趣而阅读的影响。接受研究提供了一种认识到儿童与他们选择的阅读之间的相互作用的见解。虽然作者无法研究20世纪中期儿童与这些故事的历史互动,但作者可以从这一类型的流行以及封闭学校社区遗产的意义中得出启示,这些遗产使得哈利波特等系列在当代人中如此成功。教育历史在历史和教育学科中的边缘地位既具有挑战性,又充满了可能性。本文借鉴了现有的国际辩论,讨论了未来的方向,以及女校故事为性别和教育研究提供的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning the rules: writing and researching school stories in history of education
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to set out three dilemmas that challenge historians of education who write for both professional and academic audiences. It focuses on the example of using fiction as a source for understanding the informal education of girls in the twentieth century. It contributes to the debate over the purpose of history of education and the possibilities that intersecting and contested analytical frameworks might contribute to the development of the discipline. Design/methodology/approach The paper discusses the rules of engagement and the duties of a historian of education. It reforms current concerns into three dilemmas: audience, method and writing. It gives examples drawn from research into girls’ school stories between 1910 and 1960. It highlights three authors and stories set in Australia, England and an international school in order to explore what fiction offers in getting “inside” the classroom. Findings Developed from a conference keynote that explored intersecting and contested histories of education, the paper sets up as many questions as it provides answers but re-frames them to include the use of a genre that has been explored by historians of childhood and literature but less so by historians of education. Research limitations/implications The vast quantity of stories set in girls’ schools between 1910 and 1960 necessarily demands a selective reading. Authors may specialise in the genre or be general young people’s fiction authors. Reading such stories must necessarily be set against changing social, cultural and political contexts. This paper uses examples from the genre in order to explore ways forward but cannot include an exhaustive methodology for reasons of space. Practical implications This paper suggests fiction as a way of broadening the remit of history of education and acting as a bridge between related sub-disciplines such as history of childhood and youth, history and education. It raises practical implications for historians of education as they seek new approaches and understanding of the process of informal education outside the classroom. Social implications This paper suggests that the authors should take more seriously the impact of children’s reading for pleasure. Reception studies offer an insight into recognising the interaction that children have with their chosen reading. While the authors cannot research how children interacted historically with these stories in the mid-twentieth century, the authors can draw implications from the popularity of the genre and the significance of the legacy of the closed school community that has made series such as Harry Potter so successful with the current generation. Originality/value The marginal place of history of education within the disciplines of history and education is both challenging and full of possibilities. The paper draws on existing international debates and discusses future directions as well as the potential that girls’ school stories offer for research into gender and education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Education Review
History of Education Review HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信