发现市场价格:哪种价格形成模型最能预测下一步交易?

A. Meyer, Ingo Fiedler
{"title":"发现市场价格:哪种价格形成模型最能预测下一步交易?","authors":"A. Meyer, Ingo Fiedler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3414972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For most purposes of technical analysis, valuation metrics and many other relevant financial methods, the price of the last transaction is considered representative of the market price. The straightforward argument is that at this price, supply and demand have last met. However, on closer examination, the question arises as to why a past event should be relevant to the future, and why other, potentially more recent information should not be used to discover a future price. Building on this question, we apply a range of new price formation models to current data available on crypto currency exchanges that depict level II market data, and compare their short-term forecast accuracy against the common-used ticker price and mid-price. Data on crypto currencies is used as the closest example to free markets, since crypto currency trading is continuous, markets never close, and interferences through oversight is extremely rare. We find that two of the five price formation models investigated outperform the widely used ticker as a price indicator for the next trade. We conclude that the volume-limited clearing price best predicts the price of subsequent trades. Its usage can thus enhance the explanatory power of various financial analyses.","PeriodicalId":11495,"journal":{"name":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discovering Market Prices: Which Price Formation Model Best Predicts the Next Trade?\",\"authors\":\"A. Meyer, Ingo Fiedler\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3414972\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For most purposes of technical analysis, valuation metrics and many other relevant financial methods, the price of the last transaction is considered representative of the market price. The straightforward argument is that at this price, supply and demand have last met. However, on closer examination, the question arises as to why a past event should be relevant to the future, and why other, potentially more recent information should not be used to discover a future price. Building on this question, we apply a range of new price formation models to current data available on crypto currency exchanges that depict level II market data, and compare their short-term forecast accuracy against the common-used ticker price and mid-price. Data on crypto currencies is used as the closest example to free markets, since crypto currency trading is continuous, markets never close, and interferences through oversight is extremely rare. We find that two of the five price formation models investigated outperform the widely used ticker as a price indicator for the next trade. We conclude that the volume-limited clearing price best predicts the price of subsequent trades. Its usage can thus enhance the explanatory power of various financial analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414972\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometric Modeling: Capital Markets - Forecasting eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3414972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

对于大多数技术分析、估值指标和许多其他相关的财务方法而言,最后一笔交易的价格被认为是市场价格的代表。最直接的理由是,在这个价格上,供需已经达到了最后的平衡。然而,仔细研究就会发现,为什么过去的事件应该与未来相关,为什么不应该使用其他可能更近期的信息来发现未来的价格。在这个问题的基础上,我们将一系列新的价格形成模型应用于描述二级市场数据的加密货币交易所的当前数据,并将其短期预测准确性与常用的股票价格和中间价格进行比较。加密货币的数据被用作最接近自由市场的例子,因为加密货币交易是连续的,市场永远不会关闭,通过监管进行的干预极为罕见。我们发现所研究的五个价格形成模型中的两个优于广泛使用的股票行情作为下一个交易的价格指标。我们得出结论,限量结算价格最能预测后续交易的价格。因此,它的使用可以增强各种财务分析的解释力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discovering Market Prices: Which Price Formation Model Best Predicts the Next Trade?
For most purposes of technical analysis, valuation metrics and many other relevant financial methods, the price of the last transaction is considered representative of the market price. The straightforward argument is that at this price, supply and demand have last met. However, on closer examination, the question arises as to why a past event should be relevant to the future, and why other, potentially more recent information should not be used to discover a future price. Building on this question, we apply a range of new price formation models to current data available on crypto currency exchanges that depict level II market data, and compare their short-term forecast accuracy against the common-used ticker price and mid-price. Data on crypto currencies is used as the closest example to free markets, since crypto currency trading is continuous, markets never close, and interferences through oversight is extremely rare. We find that two of the five price formation models investigated outperform the widely used ticker as a price indicator for the next trade. We conclude that the volume-limited clearing price best predicts the price of subsequent trades. Its usage can thus enhance the explanatory power of various financial analyses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信