参考卷烟和商品卷烟的主流颗粒相和整个主流烟中水萃取物pH值的逐次测定

C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt
{"title":"参考卷烟和商品卷烟的主流颗粒相和整个主流烟中水萃取物pH值的逐次测定","authors":"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt","doi":"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Two methods used for a puff-by-puff determination of the pH of water-extractables of cigarette smoke were compared. Particulate and whole smoke data for Kentucky Reference Cigarettes 1R3F, 1R4F, and 1R5F and for a commercial cigarette brand were collected. Mainstream particulate for each puff was collected separately on glass-fiber filter pads. The pads were extracted with deionized water (particulate method) or deionized water purged with exhaust from the smoking machine (whole smoke method) and the pH was measured. Particulate-method pH was inversely related to the amount of particulate collected, allowing for true comparisons between individual puffs from the same cigarette and between cigarette types. The whole smoke method lacked the sensitivity to distinguish between samples and is of little use as a comparative tool, probably because of the large contribution of carbon dioxide.","PeriodicalId":10257,"journal":{"name":"中国烟草科学","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PUFF-BY-PUFF DETERMINATION OF THE pH OF WATER-EXTRACTABLES FROM MAINSTREAM PARTICULATE PHASE AND WHOLE MAINSTREAM SMOKE OF REFERENCE AND COMMERCIAL CIGARETTES\",\"authors\":\"C. Williard, E. Mcdaniel, R. M. Striegel, R. Walker, M. S. Sudholt\",\"doi\":\"10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Two methods used for a puff-by-puff determination of the pH of water-extractables of cigarette smoke were compared. Particulate and whole smoke data for Kentucky Reference Cigarettes 1R3F, 1R4F, and 1R5F and for a commercial cigarette brand were collected. Mainstream particulate for each puff was collected separately on glass-fiber filter pads. The pads were extracted with deionized water (particulate method) or deionized water purged with exhaust from the smoking machine (whole smoke method) and the pH was measured. Particulate-method pH was inversely related to the amount of particulate collected, allowing for true comparisons between individual puffs from the same cigarette and between cigarette types. The whole smoke method lacked the sensitivity to distinguish between samples and is of little use as a comparative tool, probably because of the large contribution of carbon dioxide.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国烟草科学\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国烟草科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1091\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国烟草科学","FirstCategoryId":"1091","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3381/0082-4623-46.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:比较了两种逐烟法测定香烟烟气水提物pH值的方法。收集了肯塔基参考香烟1R3F、1R4F和1R5F以及商业香烟品牌的颗粒和全烟数据。每次抽吸的主流颗粒分别在玻璃纤维过滤垫上收集。用去离子水(颗粒法)或抽烟机排气后的去离子水(全烟法)提取烟垫,测定pH值。微粒法的pH值与收集到的微粒量呈负相关,从而可以在同一支香烟和不同类型的香烟之间进行真正的比较。全烟法缺乏区分样品的灵敏度,作为比较工具的用处不大,可能是因为二氧化碳的贡献很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PUFF-BY-PUFF DETERMINATION OF THE pH OF WATER-EXTRACTABLES FROM MAINSTREAM PARTICULATE PHASE AND WHOLE MAINSTREAM SMOKE OF REFERENCE AND COMMERCIAL CIGARETTES
Abstract Two methods used for a puff-by-puff determination of the pH of water-extractables of cigarette smoke were compared. Particulate and whole smoke data for Kentucky Reference Cigarettes 1R3F, 1R4F, and 1R5F and for a commercial cigarette brand were collected. Mainstream particulate for each puff was collected separately on glass-fiber filter pads. The pads were extracted with deionized water (particulate method) or deionized water purged with exhaust from the smoking machine (whole smoke method) and the pH was measured. Particulate-method pH was inversely related to the amount of particulate collected, allowing for true comparisons between individual puffs from the same cigarette and between cigarette types. The whole smoke method lacked the sensitivity to distinguish between samples and is of little use as a comparative tool, probably because of the large contribution of carbon dioxide.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3722
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信