废物处理和资源回收的不确定成本

David C. Wilson
{"title":"废物处理和资源回收的不确定成本","authors":"David C. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/0304-3967(79)90005-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Principles of economic evaluation previously developed are applied to a case study of the available options for waste disposal or resource recovery from solid waste. The dominant feature in any such analysis at a preliminary stage of planning is the uncertainty in the cost and revenue estimates. It is shown how this uncertainty can be explicitly included, with sensitivity analysis used to isolate the critical parameters and risk analysis to examine the range of probable costs. The results of the case study suggest that, of the thirty options studied, landfill at a local site or the use of pulverized waste directly as a fuel are currently the cheapest, followed by indirect landfill or the production of a solid refuse-derived fuel. Other options, including incineration and pyrolysis, appear currently uncompetitive in economic terms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101078,"journal":{"name":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","volume":"4 3","pages":"Pages 261-299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(79)90005-2","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The uncertain costs of waste disposal and resource recovery\",\"authors\":\"David C. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0304-3967(79)90005-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Principles of economic evaluation previously developed are applied to a case study of the available options for waste disposal or resource recovery from solid waste. The dominant feature in any such analysis at a preliminary stage of planning is the uncertainty in the cost and revenue estimates. It is shown how this uncertainty can be explicitly included, with sensitivity analysis used to isolate the critical parameters and risk analysis to examine the range of probable costs. The results of the case study suggest that, of the thirty options studied, landfill at a local site or the use of pulverized waste directly as a fuel are currently the cheapest, followed by indirect landfill or the production of a solid refuse-derived fuel. Other options, including incineration and pyrolysis, appear currently uncompetitive in economic terms.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 261-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1979-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0304-3967(79)90005-2\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resource Recovery and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304396779900052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resource Recovery and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304396779900052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

以前制定的经济评价原则适用于对废物处理或从固体废物中回收资源的现有备选办法的个案研究。在计划的初步阶段,任何此类分析的主要特点是成本和收入估算的不确定性。它显示了如何明确地包括这种不确定性,使用敏感性分析来隔离关键参数和风险分析来检查可能的成本范围。个案研究的结果表明,在所研究的30种选择中,在当地填埋或直接使用粉碎的废物作为燃料目前是最便宜的,其次是间接填埋或生产固体废物衍生燃料。其他选择,包括焚烧和热解,目前在经济上似乎没有竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The uncertain costs of waste disposal and resource recovery

Principles of economic evaluation previously developed are applied to a case study of the available options for waste disposal or resource recovery from solid waste. The dominant feature in any such analysis at a preliminary stage of planning is the uncertainty in the cost and revenue estimates. It is shown how this uncertainty can be explicitly included, with sensitivity analysis used to isolate the critical parameters and risk analysis to examine the range of probable costs. The results of the case study suggest that, of the thirty options studied, landfill at a local site or the use of pulverized waste directly as a fuel are currently the cheapest, followed by indirect landfill or the production of a solid refuse-derived fuel. Other options, including incineration and pyrolysis, appear currently uncompetitive in economic terms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信