SRF粉煤灰中五氯苯和六氯苯不同提取和定量方法的评价

Dimitris E. Balampanis, Frédéric Coulon, Nigel Simms, Philip Longhurst, Simon J.T. Pollard, Cecilia Fenech, Raffaella Villa
{"title":"SRF粉煤灰中五氯苯和六氯苯不同提取和定量方法的评价","authors":"Dimitris E. Balampanis,&nbsp;Frédéric Coulon,&nbsp;Nigel Simms,&nbsp;Philip Longhurst,&nbsp;Simon J.T. Pollard,&nbsp;Cecilia Fenech,&nbsp;Raffaella Villa","doi":"10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under <em>‘de novo’</em> conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g<sup>−1</sup>, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g<sup>−1</sup>. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7819,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash\",\"authors\":\"Dimitris E. Balampanis,&nbsp;Frédéric Coulon,&nbsp;Nigel Simms,&nbsp;Philip Longhurst,&nbsp;Simon J.T. Pollard,&nbsp;Cecilia Fenech,&nbsp;Raffaella Villa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under <em>‘de novo’</em> conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g<sup>−1</sup>, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g<sup>−1</sup>. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical Chemistry Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ancr.2017.01.003\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical Chemistry Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214181216300544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在存在有机物和氯的情况下产生的高氯化苯被认为是PCDD/Fs前体,并被用作间接测量后者的成本和时间方便的替代指标。在本研究中,五氯苯和六氯苯的定量用于测定固体回收燃料焚烧飞灰的有机氯负荷。有些氯苯是在“从头”条件下通过非均相(灰颗粒/烟道气)反应形成的,因此深深融入飞灰中。将加速溶剂萃取法(ASE)和超声溶剂萃取法(USE)以及文献中提出的等效清洗方法与传统索氏法进行了比较。索氏法提取率为83±7.5%,PFE法为111±19%,超声法为67±17%。与其他样品制备方法相比,通过多层硅胶柱进行索氏提取和清理的结果更为精确。此外,将单离子监测模式下的质谱仪(GC-MS-SIM)和电子捕获检测器(GC- ECD)的气相色谱性能进行比较,发现当MS-SIM的等效LOQ为3.26 ng g - 1时,ECD可用于测量低至0.21 ng g - 1的氯苯痕量。结果进一步表明,由于检测器对卤化化合物的敏感性,ECD比MS-SIM在检测粉煤灰提取物中氯苯方面可以提供更好的峰积分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash

An assessment of different extraction and quantification methods of penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene from SRF fly-ash

Highly chlorinated benzenes, produced in the presence of organic matter and chlorine, are considered PCDD/Fs precursors, and are used as cost and time convenient substitute indicators for the indirect measurement of the latter. In this study penta- and hexa-chlorobenzene are quantified for the determination of the organochloride load of fly ash from solid recovered fuel incineration. Some of the chlorobenzenes are formed under ‘de novo’ conditions, through heterogeneous (ash particles/flue gases) reactions and are therefore deeply incorporated within fly ash. Accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) and ultrasonic solvent extraction (USE), along with the equivalent clean-up methods suggested by literature were compared to traditional Soxhlet. The extraction efficiencies achieved were 83 ± 7.5% for Soxhlet, 111 ± 19% for PFE, and 67 ± 17% for ultrasonication. Soxhlet extraction and clean-up through a multilayer silica gel column gave more precise results compared to the other sample preparation methods. Furthermore, performance comparison of gas chromatography fitted with either a mass spectrometer operated in single ion monitoring mode (GC-MS-SIM), or electron capture detector (GC- ECD) highlighted that ECD can be used for measuring chlorobenzenes traces down to 0.21 ng g−1, when the equivalent LOQ for MS-SIM was 3.26 ng g−1. The results further suggest that ECD can provide better peak integration than MS-SIM in the detection of chlorobenzenes in fly ash extracts, due to the detector's sensitivity to halogenated compounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信