诊断x射线装置中防护屏障衰减辐射强度的研究

J. Lalrinmawia, K. S. Pau, R. Tiwari
{"title":"诊断x射线装置中防护屏障衰减辐射强度的研究","authors":"J. Lalrinmawia, K. S. Pau, R. Tiwari","doi":"10.33493/SCIVIS.19.02.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the present study is to find out the intensity of radiation attenuated by different types of patient entrance doors (PED) as well as control panel (CP) protective barriers in diagnostic X-ray installations. To measure the intensity of ionizing radiation, ion chamber survey meter was used; all measurements were performed in freeze mode. In setting maximum accelerating potential, minimum tube current and fixed exposure time, a water phantom was exposed through maximum field size. Radiation exposure rates were measured at CPs as well as PEDs with and without barriers. In chest mission, radiation rates with PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 0.7 mSv/h and without PED 0.2 mSv/h to 1.2 mSv/h. At the same time, in couch mission, radiation rates measured behind PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 2.2 mSv/h and 0.03 mSv/h to 2.25 mSv/h in front of PED. All institutions showed higher exposure rates without PED; all types of doors considerably attenuated radiation. Among different types of door, lead-lined door attenuated 99.53% in chest mission and 97.44% in couch mission. While plywood doors attenuated approximately 40% of the incident radiation, it is more or less similar as air does in every half meter away from the phantom. Radiation rates in chest missions with CP barriers ranged from 2 µSv/h to 0.38 mSv/h, while 0.4 mSv/h to 2.35 mSv/h without CP barriers. In couch missions, radiation rates measured with CP barriers varied from 4 µSv/h to 0.6 mSv/h whereas without CP barriers from 0.7 mSv/h to 5 mSv/h. There was a significant difference between radiation measured behind and in front of the CP barriers. Among them, the percentage of attenuation was high in lead and concrete barriers.","PeriodicalId":21329,"journal":{"name":"科技视界","volume":"100 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the intensity of radiation attenuated by protective barriers in diagnostic X-ray installations\",\"authors\":\"J. Lalrinmawia, K. S. Pau, R. Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.33493/SCIVIS.19.02.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of the present study is to find out the intensity of radiation attenuated by different types of patient entrance doors (PED) as well as control panel (CP) protective barriers in diagnostic X-ray installations. To measure the intensity of ionizing radiation, ion chamber survey meter was used; all measurements were performed in freeze mode. In setting maximum accelerating potential, minimum tube current and fixed exposure time, a water phantom was exposed through maximum field size. Radiation exposure rates were measured at CPs as well as PEDs with and without barriers. In chest mission, radiation rates with PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 0.7 mSv/h and without PED 0.2 mSv/h to 1.2 mSv/h. At the same time, in couch mission, radiation rates measured behind PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 2.2 mSv/h and 0.03 mSv/h to 2.25 mSv/h in front of PED. All institutions showed higher exposure rates without PED; all types of doors considerably attenuated radiation. Among different types of door, lead-lined door attenuated 99.53% in chest mission and 97.44% in couch mission. While plywood doors attenuated approximately 40% of the incident radiation, it is more or less similar as air does in every half meter away from the phantom. Radiation rates in chest missions with CP barriers ranged from 2 µSv/h to 0.38 mSv/h, while 0.4 mSv/h to 2.35 mSv/h without CP barriers. In couch missions, radiation rates measured with CP barriers varied from 4 µSv/h to 0.6 mSv/h whereas without CP barriers from 0.7 mSv/h to 5 mSv/h. There was a significant difference between radiation measured behind and in front of the CP barriers. Among them, the percentage of attenuation was high in lead and concrete barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"科技视界\",\"volume\":\"100 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"科技视界\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33493/SCIVIS.19.02.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"科技视界","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33493/SCIVIS.19.02.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的主要目的是找出诊断x线装置中不同类型的病人入口门(PED)和控制面板(CP)防护屏障所衰减的辐射强度。采用离子室测量仪测量电离辐射强度;所有的测量都是在冻结模式下进行的。在设定最大加速电位、最小管电流和固定曝光时间时,通过最大场尺寸曝光水影。测量了有屏障和没有屏障的儿科和儿科的辐射暴露率。在胸部任务中,PED的辐射率范围为0.3µSv/h至0.7 mSv/h,而没有PED的辐射率范围为0.2 mSv/h至1.2 mSv/h。与此同时,在沙发任务中,PED后的辐射率为0.3µSv/h至2.2 mSv/h, PED前的辐射率为0.03 mSv/h至2.25 mSv/h。没有PED的机构暴露率较高;所有类型的门都能有效地减弱辐射。在不同类型的门中,铅衬门对胸部任务和沙发任务的衰减率分别为99.53%和97.44%。虽然胶合板门衰减了大约40%的入射辐射,但它或多或少与距离幽灵半米的空气相似。有CP屏障的胸部任务的辐射率为2µSv/h至0.38 mSv/h,而没有CP屏障的辐射率为0.4 mSv/h至2.35 mSv/h。在沙发任务中,有CP屏障的辐射率从4µSv/h到0.6 mSv/h不等,而没有CP屏障的辐射率从0.7 mSv/h到5 mSv/h不等。在CP屏障前后测得的辐射有显著差异。其中,铅屏障和混凝土屏障的衰减率较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the intensity of radiation attenuated by protective barriers in diagnostic X-ray installations
The main objective of the present study is to find out the intensity of radiation attenuated by different types of patient entrance doors (PED) as well as control panel (CP) protective barriers in diagnostic X-ray installations. To measure the intensity of ionizing radiation, ion chamber survey meter was used; all measurements were performed in freeze mode. In setting maximum accelerating potential, minimum tube current and fixed exposure time, a water phantom was exposed through maximum field size. Radiation exposure rates were measured at CPs as well as PEDs with and without barriers. In chest mission, radiation rates with PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 0.7 mSv/h and without PED 0.2 mSv/h to 1.2 mSv/h. At the same time, in couch mission, radiation rates measured behind PED ranged from 0.3 µSv/h to 2.2 mSv/h and 0.03 mSv/h to 2.25 mSv/h in front of PED. All institutions showed higher exposure rates without PED; all types of doors considerably attenuated radiation. Among different types of door, lead-lined door attenuated 99.53% in chest mission and 97.44% in couch mission. While plywood doors attenuated approximately 40% of the incident radiation, it is more or less similar as air does in every half meter away from the phantom. Radiation rates in chest missions with CP barriers ranged from 2 µSv/h to 0.38 mSv/h, while 0.4 mSv/h to 2.35 mSv/h without CP barriers. In couch missions, radiation rates measured with CP barriers varied from 4 µSv/h to 0.6 mSv/h whereas without CP barriers from 0.7 mSv/h to 5 mSv/h. There was a significant difference between radiation measured behind and in front of the CP barriers. Among them, the percentage of attenuation was high in lead and concrete barriers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59577
期刊介绍: Science & Technology Vision is a science and technology journal supervised by the Shanghai Association for Science and Technology and sponsored by the Shanghai Science Writers Association. It takes grassroots science and education workers as readers, popularizes scientific knowledge, tracks hot issues in science and technology at home and abroad, pays attention to new developments, new technologies, and new achievements in the forefront of the science and technology community, adheres to the combination of theory and practice, popularization and exploration, integrates scientificity, knowledge, academicity, and foresight, and builds a platform and theoretical position for academic debate for the majority of science and technology workers. Science & Technology Vision has been fully included in "China National Knowledge Infrastructure", "Chinese Science and Technology Journal (VIP) Database", "Longyuan Journal Network", "Education Reading Network", and "Wanfang Database".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信