作为延迟效应的化学武器受害者屈光不正发生率

A. Riazi, K. Jadidi, A. K. Zarchi, M. Naderi
{"title":"作为延迟效应的化学武器受害者屈光不正发生率","authors":"A. Riazi, K. Jadidi, A. K. Zarchi, M. Naderi","doi":"10.1081/CUS-200025578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Many victims of chemical warfare (VCW) manifest some degree of refractive errors which were not present before exposure. These refractive errors are presumably long‐term (delayed) effects of sulfur mustard exposure. However, no related research studies have been done to confirm this. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are the refractive errors of the eye and prevalence of these errors depends on several factors such as hereditary factors, age, profession, and also several geographical factors. The effect of sulfur mustard on the eye may be very complex and relates basically to the intensity of the injury. Sulfur mustard targets the cornea resulting in early effects of exposure. The delayed effects of exposure are less documented and are discussed in this study. Materials and Method: In this study, cross‐sectional study refractive errors were studied as one of the delayed effects of sulfur mustard in VCW. 2252 eyes of VCW and 2248 normal eyes were chosen as controls. The mean age of both groups were 34.3 (SD = 9.1) and 32.1 (SD = 10.1) respectively. Both groups went through an optometric and ophthalmic examination. The refractive errors were measured by autorefractometer (Topcon RM 2300). The Student t‐test and chi‐square test were used and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The prevalence of refractive errors in the VCW group was 89.8% which was higher than the control group of 72.6% p < 0.001. Astigmatism was the main refractive error in the VCW group and their prevalence (76.2%) was higher than the control group (47%) p < 0.001. The types of astigmatism found were “against” and “oblique.” Prevalence of myopic astigmatism in the VCW group was also higher than in the other types of astigmatisms. Discussion: There are three main causes for refractive errors. Change in anterior‐posterior length of the eye or change in curvature of refractive surfaces and change in the index or combinations of them. All VCW have photophobia, dry eyes, and excessive blinking. They have narrow eye opening (narrow palpebral fissure). Eyelid pressure and excessive blinking, and dry eyes add gradual pressure on the cornea and in the long term lead to induce refractive errors such as astigmatism. Further studies will be needed however to confirm this.","PeriodicalId":17547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":"92 6 1","pages":"207 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Refractive Errors in Victims of Chemical Weapons as Delayed Effects\",\"authors\":\"A. Riazi, K. Jadidi, A. K. Zarchi, M. Naderi\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/CUS-200025578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Many victims of chemical warfare (VCW) manifest some degree of refractive errors which were not present before exposure. These refractive errors are presumably long‐term (delayed) effects of sulfur mustard exposure. However, no related research studies have been done to confirm this. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are the refractive errors of the eye and prevalence of these errors depends on several factors such as hereditary factors, age, profession, and also several geographical factors. The effect of sulfur mustard on the eye may be very complex and relates basically to the intensity of the injury. Sulfur mustard targets the cornea resulting in early effects of exposure. The delayed effects of exposure are less documented and are discussed in this study. Materials and Method: In this study, cross‐sectional study refractive errors were studied as one of the delayed effects of sulfur mustard in VCW. 2252 eyes of VCW and 2248 normal eyes were chosen as controls. The mean age of both groups were 34.3 (SD = 9.1) and 32.1 (SD = 10.1) respectively. Both groups went through an optometric and ophthalmic examination. The refractive errors were measured by autorefractometer (Topcon RM 2300). The Student t‐test and chi‐square test were used and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The prevalence of refractive errors in the VCW group was 89.8% which was higher than the control group of 72.6% p < 0.001. Astigmatism was the main refractive error in the VCW group and their prevalence (76.2%) was higher than the control group (47%) p < 0.001. The types of astigmatism found were “against” and “oblique.” Prevalence of myopic astigmatism in the VCW group was also higher than in the other types of astigmatisms. Discussion: There are three main causes for refractive errors. Change in anterior‐posterior length of the eye or change in curvature of refractive surfaces and change in the index or combinations of them. All VCW have photophobia, dry eyes, and excessive blinking. They have narrow eye opening (narrow palpebral fissure). Eyelid pressure and excessive blinking, and dry eyes add gradual pressure on the cornea and in the long term lead to induce refractive errors such as astigmatism. Further studies will be needed however to confirm this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"92 6 1\",\"pages\":\"207 - 214\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-200025578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-200025578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

导读:许多化学战(VCW)的受害者表现出某种程度的屈光不正,这在暴露之前是不存在的。这些屈光不正可能是硫磺芥暴露的长期(延迟)影响。然而,并没有相关的研究来证实这一点。近视、远视和散光是眼睛的屈光不正,这些错误的流行取决于几个因素,如遗传因素、年龄、职业和一些地理因素。硫芥对眼睛的影响可能是非常复杂的,主要与伤害的强度有关。硫芥菜以角膜为目标,导致暴露的早期影响。暴露的延迟效应文献较少,本研究对此进行了讨论。材料与方法:本研究采用横断面研究方法,研究了硫芥在VCW中的延迟效应之一——屈光不正。选取VCW患者2252只眼和正常患者2248只眼作为对照。两组患者平均年龄分别为34.3岁(SD = 9.1)和32.1岁(SD = 10.1)。两组均进行验光和眼科检查。采用Topcon RM 2300自折射仪测量屈光误差。采用学生t检验和卡方检验,P < 0.05为显著性。结果:VCW组屈光不正发生率为89.8%,高于对照组的72.6%,p < 0.001。VCW组屈光不正发生率为76.2%,高于对照组(47%),p < 0.001。所发现的散光类型为“反向”和“斜向”。VCW组近视散光的发生率也高于其他类型的散光。讨论:造成屈光不正的主要原因有三个。眼睛前后长度的变化,或屈光面曲率的变化,以及它们的指数或组合的变化。所有的VCW都有畏光、眼睛干涩和过度眨眼的症状。他们有狭窄的睁眼(狭窄的睑裂)。眼睑受压和过度眨眼以及眼睛干涩会逐渐加重角膜的压力,长期下去会导致散光等屈光不正。然而,需要进一步的研究来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of Refractive Errors in Victims of Chemical Weapons as Delayed Effects
Introduction: Many victims of chemical warfare (VCW) manifest some degree of refractive errors which were not present before exposure. These refractive errors are presumably long‐term (delayed) effects of sulfur mustard exposure. However, no related research studies have been done to confirm this. Myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism are the refractive errors of the eye and prevalence of these errors depends on several factors such as hereditary factors, age, profession, and also several geographical factors. The effect of sulfur mustard on the eye may be very complex and relates basically to the intensity of the injury. Sulfur mustard targets the cornea resulting in early effects of exposure. The delayed effects of exposure are less documented and are discussed in this study. Materials and Method: In this study, cross‐sectional study refractive errors were studied as one of the delayed effects of sulfur mustard in VCW. 2252 eyes of VCW and 2248 normal eyes were chosen as controls. The mean age of both groups were 34.3 (SD = 9.1) and 32.1 (SD = 10.1) respectively. Both groups went through an optometric and ophthalmic examination. The refractive errors were measured by autorefractometer (Topcon RM 2300). The Student t‐test and chi‐square test were used and P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The prevalence of refractive errors in the VCW group was 89.8% which was higher than the control group of 72.6% p < 0.001. Astigmatism was the main refractive error in the VCW group and their prevalence (76.2%) was higher than the control group (47%) p < 0.001. The types of astigmatism found were “against” and “oblique.” Prevalence of myopic astigmatism in the VCW group was also higher than in the other types of astigmatisms. Discussion: There are three main causes for refractive errors. Change in anterior‐posterior length of the eye or change in curvature of refractive surfaces and change in the index or combinations of them. All VCW have photophobia, dry eyes, and excessive blinking. They have narrow eye opening (narrow palpebral fissure). Eyelid pressure and excessive blinking, and dry eyes add gradual pressure on the cornea and in the long term lead to induce refractive errors such as astigmatism. Further studies will be needed however to confirm this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信