分析南埃塞俄比亚体育委员会办公室体育组织结构的现状和战略维度

{"title":"分析南埃塞俄比亚体育委员会办公室体育组织结构的现状和战略维度","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/coa.07.03.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The structure of an organization is significant because it determines how employees and volunteers interact in terms of job tasks, decision-making procedures, the need for collaboration, levels of responsibility, and reporting mechanisms. Specialization, standardization and centralization are three structural dimensions that have long been used to define organizational traits and arrangements. Objective: To analyse the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Methods: An institutional based descriptive survey research approach was conducted at the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Data were collected by using a self-administered questionnaire. Study participants were allocated proportionally based on their profession by using a purposive sampling method. Data were entered and analysed by using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive statistics frequency and percent were used to describe the analysis of variables in the study area. Result: In this study, the status and strategy dimensions of the sport organizational structure in South Ethiopia sport commission office, like work specializations implemented were only (60.4%), departmentalization (62.3%), chain of command that there was no reporting trial between managers and employers (43.3%). The wide type of control was (64.2%), the status of centralization was (62.2%) and decentralization was only (24.5%). Conclusion: According to the findings of the current study, the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the South Ethiopia sports commission office is very low. Factors affecting departmentalization include work type, employer’s field of study, different task process and environmental risk. Factors affecting the span of control competencies of subordinate, nature of work, quality of planning, communication techniques, organizational structure, organizational culture, and complexity of organizations were independent predictors of strategic dimension in sport organizational structurePreparing and providing programmed continuously on the job, organizing seminars and up on hire training on strategic dimensions of sport organizational structure should be crucial. To enhance the span of control adminsterative personnel should practice direct control of supervisors and subordinates. In chain of command, administrative personnel and employers should follow reporting trials between the employers and upper managers.","PeriodicalId":93027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","volume":"1117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the Status and Strategy Dimensions of the Sport Organizational Structure in the South Ethiopia Sport Commission Office\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33140/coa.07.03.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Background: The structure of an organization is significant because it determines how employees and volunteers interact in terms of job tasks, decision-making procedures, the need for collaboration, levels of responsibility, and reporting mechanisms. Specialization, standardization and centralization are three structural dimensions that have long been used to define organizational traits and arrangements. Objective: To analyse the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Methods: An institutional based descriptive survey research approach was conducted at the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Data were collected by using a self-administered questionnaire. Study participants were allocated proportionally based on their profession by using a purposive sampling method. Data were entered and analysed by using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive statistics frequency and percent were used to describe the analysis of variables in the study area. Result: In this study, the status and strategy dimensions of the sport organizational structure in South Ethiopia sport commission office, like work specializations implemented were only (60.4%), departmentalization (62.3%), chain of command that there was no reporting trial between managers and employers (43.3%). The wide type of control was (64.2%), the status of centralization was (62.2%) and decentralization was only (24.5%). Conclusion: According to the findings of the current study, the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the South Ethiopia sports commission office is very low. Factors affecting departmentalization include work type, employer’s field of study, different task process and environmental risk. Factors affecting the span of control competencies of subordinate, nature of work, quality of planning, communication techniques, organizational structure, organizational culture, and complexity of organizations were independent predictors of strategic dimension in sport organizational structurePreparing and providing programmed continuously on the job, organizing seminars and up on hire training on strategic dimensions of sport organizational structure should be crucial. To enhance the span of control adminsterative personnel should practice direct control of supervisors and subordinates. In chain of command, administrative personnel and employers should follow reporting trials between the employers and upper managers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"volume\":\"1117 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of integrative cardiology open access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33140/coa.07.03.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of integrative cardiology open access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/coa.07.03.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:组织结构决定了员工和志愿者在工作任务、决策程序、协作需求、责任级别和报告机制等方面的互动方式,因此组织结构具有重要意义。专业化、标准化和集中化是长期以来用来定义组织特征和组织安排的三个结构维度。目的:分析埃塞俄比亚南部体育委员会办公室体育组织结构的现状和战略维度。方法:在南埃塞俄比亚体育委员会办公室进行了基于机构的描述性调查研究方法。数据收集采用自填问卷。采用有目的抽样法,按职业比例分配研究对象。采用SPSS 20.0进行数据录入和分析。使用描述性统计频率和百分比来描述研究区域内变量的分析。结果:在本研究中,南埃塞俄比亚体育委员会办公室的体育组织结构现状和战略维度,如实施工作专业化(60.4%),部门化(62.3%),指挥链,管理者和雇主之间没有报告试验(43.3%)。广泛控制类型占64.2%,集中化状态占62.2%,分散化状态仅占24.5%。结论:根据目前的研究结果,南埃塞俄比亚体育委员会办公室的体育组织结构的地位和战略维度很低。影响部门化的因素包括工作类型、雇主的研究领域、不同的任务流程和环境风险。影响下属控制能力跨度、工作性质、规划质量、沟通技巧、组织结构、组织文化和组织复杂性的因素是体育组织结构战略维度的独立预测因素。在工作中准备和提供持续的计划,组织研讨会和招聘培训,体育组织结构的战略维度应该是至关重要的。为了提高控制的广度,行政人员应该对上级和下级实行直接控制。在指挥系统中,行政人员和雇主应遵循雇主与上级管理人员之间的报告审判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing the Status and Strategy Dimensions of the Sport Organizational Structure in the South Ethiopia Sport Commission Office
Abstract Background: The structure of an organization is significant because it determines how employees and volunteers interact in terms of job tasks, decision-making procedures, the need for collaboration, levels of responsibility, and reporting mechanisms. Specialization, standardization and centralization are three structural dimensions that have long been used to define organizational traits and arrangements. Objective: To analyse the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Methods: An institutional based descriptive survey research approach was conducted at the south Ethiopia sport commission office. Data were collected by using a self-administered questionnaire. Study participants were allocated proportionally based on their profession by using a purposive sampling method. Data were entered and analysed by using SPSS version 20.0. Descriptive statistics frequency and percent were used to describe the analysis of variables in the study area. Result: In this study, the status and strategy dimensions of the sport organizational structure in South Ethiopia sport commission office, like work specializations implemented were only (60.4%), departmentalization (62.3%), chain of command that there was no reporting trial between managers and employers (43.3%). The wide type of control was (64.2%), the status of centralization was (62.2%) and decentralization was only (24.5%). Conclusion: According to the findings of the current study, the status and strategy dimension of the sport organizational structure in the South Ethiopia sports commission office is very low. Factors affecting departmentalization include work type, employer’s field of study, different task process and environmental risk. Factors affecting the span of control competencies of subordinate, nature of work, quality of planning, communication techniques, organizational structure, organizational culture, and complexity of organizations were independent predictors of strategic dimension in sport organizational structurePreparing and providing programmed continuously on the job, organizing seminars and up on hire training on strategic dimensions of sport organizational structure should be crucial. To enhance the span of control adminsterative personnel should practice direct control of supervisors and subordinates. In chain of command, administrative personnel and employers should follow reporting trials between the employers and upper managers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信