零截断泊松-林德利分布总体均值的非参数Bootstrap置信区间及其应用

Q4 Multidisciplinary
Wannaphon Suriyakat, W. Panichkitkosolkul
{"title":"零截断泊松-林德利分布总体均值的非参数Bootstrap置信区间及其应用","authors":"Wannaphon Suriyakat, W. Panichkitkosolkul","doi":"10.59796/jcst.v13n3.2023.1077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution has been proposed for studying count data containing non-zero values. However, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence interval estimation of the population mean has not yet been studied. In this study, confidence interval estimation based on percentile, simple, and biased-corrected bootstrap methods was compared in terms of coverage probability and average interval length via Monte Carlo simulation. The true values of parameter ()  were set as 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2, and the population means  are approximate 7.7586, 4.0909, 2.4000, 1.8817, and 1.6364, respectively. The bootstrap samples (=1,000)  of size  were generated from the original sample, and each simulation was repeated 1,000 times. The results indicate that attaining the nominal confidence level using the bootstrap confidence intervals was impossible for small sample sizes regardless of the other settings. Moreover, when the sample size was large, the performance of the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals was not substantially different. Overall, the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval outperformed the others, even for small sample sizes. Last, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals were used to calculate the confidence interval for the population mean of the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution via two numerical examples, the results of which match those from the simulation study.","PeriodicalId":36369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonparametric Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Population Mean of a Zero-Truncated Poisson-Lindley Distribution and Their Application\",\"authors\":\"Wannaphon Suriyakat, W. Panichkitkosolkul\",\"doi\":\"10.59796/jcst.v13n3.2023.1077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution has been proposed for studying count data containing non-zero values. However, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence interval estimation of the population mean has not yet been studied. In this study, confidence interval estimation based on percentile, simple, and biased-corrected bootstrap methods was compared in terms of coverage probability and average interval length via Monte Carlo simulation. The true values of parameter ()  were set as 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2, and the population means  are approximate 7.7586, 4.0909, 2.4000, 1.8817, and 1.6364, respectively. The bootstrap samples (=1,000)  of size  were generated from the original sample, and each simulation was repeated 1,000 times. The results indicate that attaining the nominal confidence level using the bootstrap confidence intervals was impossible for small sample sizes regardless of the other settings. Moreover, when the sample size was large, the performance of the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals was not substantially different. Overall, the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval outperformed the others, even for small sample sizes. Last, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals were used to calculate the confidence interval for the population mean of the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution via two numerical examples, the results of which match those from the simulation study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v13n3.2023.1077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.v13n3.2023.1077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,零截断泊松-林德利分布被提出用于研究含有非零值的计数数据。然而,总体均值的非参数自举置信区间估计尚未得到研究。在本研究中,通过蒙特卡罗模拟,比较了基于百分位、简单和偏校正的bootstrap方法的置信区间估计的覆盖概率和平均区间长度。参数()的真值设置为0.25、0.5、1、1.5和2,总体均值分别近似为7.7586、4.0909、2.4000、1.8817和1.6364。从原始样本中生成大小为1000的bootstrap样本,每次模拟重复1000次。结果表明,无论其他设置如何,使用自举置信区间获得名义置信水平对于小样本量是不可能的。此外,当样本量较大时,非参数自举置信区间的性能没有实质性差异。总的来说,偏差校正的自举置信区间优于其他置信区间,即使是小样本量。最后,通过两个数值算例,利用非参数自举置信区间计算零截断泊松-林德利分布总体均值的置信区间,结果与仿真研究结果吻合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonparametric Bootstrap Confidence Intervals for the Population Mean of a Zero-Truncated Poisson-Lindley Distribution and Their Application
Recently, the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution has been proposed for studying count data containing non-zero values. However, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence interval estimation of the population mean has not yet been studied. In this study, confidence interval estimation based on percentile, simple, and biased-corrected bootstrap methods was compared in terms of coverage probability and average interval length via Monte Carlo simulation. The true values of parameter ()  were set as 0.25, 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2, and the population means  are approximate 7.7586, 4.0909, 2.4000, 1.8817, and 1.6364, respectively. The bootstrap samples (=1,000)  of size  were generated from the original sample, and each simulation was repeated 1,000 times. The results indicate that attaining the nominal confidence level using the bootstrap confidence intervals was impossible for small sample sizes regardless of the other settings. Moreover, when the sample size was large, the performance of the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals was not substantially different. Overall, the bias-corrected bootstrap confidence interval outperformed the others, even for small sample sizes. Last, the nonparametric bootstrap confidence intervals were used to calculate the confidence interval for the population mean of the zero-truncated Poisson-Lindley distribution via two numerical examples, the results of which match those from the simulation study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Current Science and Technology
Journal of Current Science and Technology Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信