爱丁堡产后抑郁量表:日本产后一个月母亲因素结构及其社会心理相关因素的模型比较

Ayako Hada, C. Kubota, M. Imura, Fumie Takauma, K. Tada, T. Kitamura
{"title":"爱丁堡产后抑郁量表:日本产后一个月母亲因素结构及其社会心理相关因素的模型比较","authors":"Ayako Hada, C. Kubota, M. Imura, Fumie Takauma, K. Tada, T. Kitamura","doi":"10.2174/1874922401911010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox, Holden & Sagovsky, 1987) has been widely used as a screening instrument. It is also used as a measure of Postnatal Depression (PND) severity. Various EPDS factor structure models have been proposed in many studies without an unequivocal conclusion. We compared first-order, higher-order factor, and bifactor models of the EPDS, and examined possible predictors of subscales by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).Data came from a follow-up study of 758 women after childbirth on two occasions (five days and one month postnatal). We used the EPDS together with items tapping Negative Life Events (NLEs) and coping styles and behaviours.The bifactor model showed the best fit with data compared with all other models: CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.14, and AIC = 79.637. A single general dimension alongside three distinct subfactors (anhedonia, anxiety, and dysphoria) was predicted differentially by various predictor variables.Our study expanded on a previous factor structural study of the EPDS and developed the hierarchical (bifactor) model. The model’s construct validity was confirmed by its meaningful associations with NLEs and coping styles and behaviours.","PeriodicalId":75160,"journal":{"name":"The open family studies journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Model Comparison of Factor Structure and its Psychosocial Correlates Among Mothers at One Month After Childbirth in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Ayako Hada, C. Kubota, M. Imura, Fumie Takauma, K. Tada, T. Kitamura\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874922401911010001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox, Holden & Sagovsky, 1987) has been widely used as a screening instrument. It is also used as a measure of Postnatal Depression (PND) severity. Various EPDS factor structure models have been proposed in many studies without an unequivocal conclusion. We compared first-order, higher-order factor, and bifactor models of the EPDS, and examined possible predictors of subscales by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).Data came from a follow-up study of 758 women after childbirth on two occasions (five days and one month postnatal). We used the EPDS together with items tapping Negative Life Events (NLEs) and coping styles and behaviours.The bifactor model showed the best fit with data compared with all other models: CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.14, and AIC = 79.637. A single general dimension alongside three distinct subfactors (anhedonia, anxiety, and dysphoria) was predicted differentially by various predictor variables.Our study expanded on a previous factor structural study of the EPDS and developed the hierarchical (bifactor) model. The model’s construct validity was confirmed by its meaningful associations with NLEs and coping styles and behaviours.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The open family studies journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The open family studies journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874922401911010001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The open family studies journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874922401911010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

爱丁堡产后抑郁量表;Cox, Holden & Sagovsky, 1987)已被广泛用作筛选工具。它也被用来衡量产后抑郁症(PND)的严重程度。许多研究提出了各种EPDS因子结构模型,但没有一个明确的结论。我们比较了EPDS的一阶、高阶因子和双因子模型,并通过结构方程模型(SEM)检验了可能的子量表预测因子。数据来自一项对758名妇女的随访研究,她们在分娩后两次(产后5天和产后一个月)。我们将EPDS与消极生活事件(NLEs)、应对方式和行为项目一起使用。与其他模型相比,双因子模型与数据的拟合效果最佳:CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.14, AIC = 79.637。一个单一的总体维度与三个不同的子因素(快感缺乏、焦虑和烦躁)一起被不同的预测变量所预测。我们的研究扩展了先前对EPDS的因素结构研究,并发展了层次(双因素)模型。该模型的构念效度与NLEs、应对方式和行为之间存在显著关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Model Comparison of Factor Structure and its Psychosocial Correlates Among Mothers at One Month After Childbirth in Japan
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox, Holden & Sagovsky, 1987) has been widely used as a screening instrument. It is also used as a measure of Postnatal Depression (PND) severity. Various EPDS factor structure models have been proposed in many studies without an unequivocal conclusion. We compared first-order, higher-order factor, and bifactor models of the EPDS, and examined possible predictors of subscales by Structural Equation Modelling (SEM).Data came from a follow-up study of 758 women after childbirth on two occasions (five days and one month postnatal). We used the EPDS together with items tapping Negative Life Events (NLEs) and coping styles and behaviours.The bifactor model showed the best fit with data compared with all other models: CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.14, and AIC = 79.637. A single general dimension alongside three distinct subfactors (anhedonia, anxiety, and dysphoria) was predicted differentially by various predictor variables.Our study expanded on a previous factor structural study of the EPDS and developed the hierarchical (bifactor) model. The model’s construct validity was confirmed by its meaningful associations with NLEs and coping styles and behaviours.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信