新加坡国立大学教师培训与教育学院语篇分析课程与论坛模式Http://daviqr.com

Daviq Rizal
{"title":"新加坡国立大学教师培训与教育学院语篇分析课程与论坛模式Http://daviqr.com","authors":"Daviq Rizal","doi":"10.31002/metathesis.v1i1.234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sampai saat ini UIN Walisongo Semarang tidak memiliki sebuah laman berbasis Moodle yaitu sebuah aplikasi hybrid online course yang diperuntukkan bagi mahasiswa dan dosen. Oleh karena itu, sebuah laman yang beralamatkan http://daviqr.com berbasis model Moodle diciptakan dan dikembangkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain Research and Development. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 90 mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris semester 6, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, IAIN Walisongo Semarang yang mengambil mata kuliah Discourse Analysis pada tahun akademik 2015/2016. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner dengan model open-ended and closedended questions. Merujuk pada hasil penelitian sebelumnya, siswa mempunyai ketertarikan tinggi pada forum-forum diskusi online, kuis berbasis daring, dan materi ajar berbasis daring. Mahasiswa berpendapat bahwa konsep modul materi yang terdiri atas materi ajar dan modul forum dapat diimplementasikan untuk pengajaran lainnya. Mereka berpendapat bahwa dosen tidak hanya mengajar dan memberikan materi di ruang kelas, tetapi mereka dapat memberikan kebebasan pada mahasiswa untuk belajar dari sumber materi online. Hal ini dapat membuat hubungan dosen dan siswa menjadi lebih kuat dan dekat. Kata Kunci: Moodle-based websites, hybrid online courses, discourse analysis, discussion forum, quiz, reading materials A. Background of the Study So far UIN Walisongo Semarang has not been ready yet for a Moodle-based website for students and lecturers. Hence, http://daviqr.com/ was created and installed with Moodle 3.0. There are some main reasons why most students agree that the blended learning course is an interesting course and why they prefer the hybrid online course or the combination between online and traditional classroom. First, the course outline and objectives were made clearly. Second, they learned a lot from this hybrid course. Third, the reading materials were clear and informative. Fourth, the METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 63 level of this hybrid course is just right. Fifth, the total study load of this hybrid course is in proportion to the number of semester credits is just right. Sixth, the amount of the interaction with other students is a little better. Seventh, the quality of their interaction with other students is a little better. Eighth, the amount of their interaction with the instructor is a little better. Ninth, the quality of their interaction with the instructor is a little better and about the same. Tenth, compared to a faceto-face (traditional) class of equal credits, the workload of this online course is somewhat more (Daviq Rizal, 2015). Based on the previous research (Daviq Rizal, 2015), students enjoy hybrid online learning. Indeed on average they spent less than three hours on this course including reading materials, online discussions, quizzes, and assignments. However, most students had not enrolled in any classes previously and more female than male participated in the survey. In terms of the components of hybrid online course students like was mostly online discussion forum. What students disliked from blended learning varied. Some students disliked the assignment every week. Also, they had limited time to do the quiz so that they had to rush. Students also expected help from the faculty. Some of them expected more Wifi hot-spots to improve the data connection speed. They expected the faculty to provide many computers and access to the Internet. Mostly, students were complaint about the Internet connection in the faculty. Students thought that the hybrid online courses should continue. Moreover, based on my last year research on online assessment, most students agreed that the access to online assessment of http://daviqr.com was very good. Besides, the online assessment in quizzes helped students to develop their knowledge and skills in the subject of Discourse Analysis. Moreover, the online discussions helped students to improve their writing and analytical skills. The tests in http://daviqr.com were specified sufficiently for students to know what they had to do for their needs. The answer keys of the quizzes in http://daviqr.com were very helpful to their learning. The relationship between examinations and learning activities was excellent. Appropriateness of assigned materials such as reading materials and teacher presentation to the nature of online assessment was above average. Online assessments in http://daviqr.com made students cheat and not cheat p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2107 64 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching during quizzes and examinations. The duration of the quizzes and tests was very short. The availability of necessary online resources in http://daviqr.com was above average. Honestly interestingly there were 2 students admitted that they cheated their friends’ work during online assessment. However, most students admitted neutral. Online assessment was the same as offline assessment. Compared to other college assessments, the intellectual challenge of the online assessment presented in http://daviqr.com was average. Compared to other college assessments, the amount of efforts required to succeed in this online assessment was average. On average, students spent 31 – 45 minutes on the online assessments. Students overall evaluation of the online assessment in http//:daviqr.com was good. In brief, the needs of creating Moodle websites for students and lecturers are a must as quick as possible. Besides, the needs for researching such Moodle are an option for English language teachers and lecturers of other subjects. B. Research Questions 1. How is the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 2. How is the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 3. How do students of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang ? C. Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are to describe the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, and students’ METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 65 responses of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang. D. Limitation of the study The research is limited to the population of the English Departments students of UIN Walisongo Semarang taking the subject of Discourse Analysis in the academic year of 2015 / 2016 with the researcher. E. Review of Related Literature","PeriodicalId":34019,"journal":{"name":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","volume":"163 9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lesson and Forum Modules of Http://daviqr.com in the Subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, UIN Walisongo Semarang\",\"authors\":\"Daviq Rizal\",\"doi\":\"10.31002/metathesis.v1i1.234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sampai saat ini UIN Walisongo Semarang tidak memiliki sebuah laman berbasis Moodle yaitu sebuah aplikasi hybrid online course yang diperuntukkan bagi mahasiswa dan dosen. Oleh karena itu, sebuah laman yang beralamatkan http://daviqr.com berbasis model Moodle diciptakan dan dikembangkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain Research and Development. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 90 mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris semester 6, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, IAIN Walisongo Semarang yang mengambil mata kuliah Discourse Analysis pada tahun akademik 2015/2016. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner dengan model open-ended and closedended questions. Merujuk pada hasil penelitian sebelumnya, siswa mempunyai ketertarikan tinggi pada forum-forum diskusi online, kuis berbasis daring, dan materi ajar berbasis daring. Mahasiswa berpendapat bahwa konsep modul materi yang terdiri atas materi ajar dan modul forum dapat diimplementasikan untuk pengajaran lainnya. Mereka berpendapat bahwa dosen tidak hanya mengajar dan memberikan materi di ruang kelas, tetapi mereka dapat memberikan kebebasan pada mahasiswa untuk belajar dari sumber materi online. Hal ini dapat membuat hubungan dosen dan siswa menjadi lebih kuat dan dekat. Kata Kunci: Moodle-based websites, hybrid online courses, discourse analysis, discussion forum, quiz, reading materials A. Background of the Study So far UIN Walisongo Semarang has not been ready yet for a Moodle-based website for students and lecturers. Hence, http://daviqr.com/ was created and installed with Moodle 3.0. There are some main reasons why most students agree that the blended learning course is an interesting course and why they prefer the hybrid online course or the combination between online and traditional classroom. First, the course outline and objectives were made clearly. Second, they learned a lot from this hybrid course. Third, the reading materials were clear and informative. Fourth, the METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 63 level of this hybrid course is just right. Fifth, the total study load of this hybrid course is in proportion to the number of semester credits is just right. Sixth, the amount of the interaction with other students is a little better. Seventh, the quality of their interaction with other students is a little better. Eighth, the amount of their interaction with the instructor is a little better. Ninth, the quality of their interaction with the instructor is a little better and about the same. Tenth, compared to a faceto-face (traditional) class of equal credits, the workload of this online course is somewhat more (Daviq Rizal, 2015). Based on the previous research (Daviq Rizal, 2015), students enjoy hybrid online learning. Indeed on average they spent less than three hours on this course including reading materials, online discussions, quizzes, and assignments. However, most students had not enrolled in any classes previously and more female than male participated in the survey. In terms of the components of hybrid online course students like was mostly online discussion forum. What students disliked from blended learning varied. Some students disliked the assignment every week. Also, they had limited time to do the quiz so that they had to rush. Students also expected help from the faculty. Some of them expected more Wifi hot-spots to improve the data connection speed. They expected the faculty to provide many computers and access to the Internet. Mostly, students were complaint about the Internet connection in the faculty. Students thought that the hybrid online courses should continue. Moreover, based on my last year research on online assessment, most students agreed that the access to online assessment of http://daviqr.com was very good. Besides, the online assessment in quizzes helped students to develop their knowledge and skills in the subject of Discourse Analysis. Moreover, the online discussions helped students to improve their writing and analytical skills. The tests in http://daviqr.com were specified sufficiently for students to know what they had to do for their needs. The answer keys of the quizzes in http://daviqr.com were very helpful to their learning. The relationship between examinations and learning activities was excellent. Appropriateness of assigned materials such as reading materials and teacher presentation to the nature of online assessment was above average. Online assessments in http://daviqr.com made students cheat and not cheat p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2107 64 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching during quizzes and examinations. The duration of the quizzes and tests was very short. The availability of necessary online resources in http://daviqr.com was above average. Honestly interestingly there were 2 students admitted that they cheated their friends’ work during online assessment. However, most students admitted neutral. Online assessment was the same as offline assessment. Compared to other college assessments, the intellectual challenge of the online assessment presented in http://daviqr.com was average. Compared to other college assessments, the amount of efforts required to succeed in this online assessment was average. On average, students spent 31 – 45 minutes on the online assessments. Students overall evaluation of the online assessment in http//:daviqr.com was good. In brief, the needs of creating Moodle websites for students and lecturers are a must as quick as possible. Besides, the needs for researching such Moodle are an option for English language teachers and lecturers of other subjects. B. Research Questions 1. How is the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 2. How is the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 3. How do students of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang ? C. Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are to describe the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, and students’ METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 65 responses of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang. D. Limitation of the study The research is limited to the population of the English Departments students of UIN Walisongo Semarang taking the subject of Discourse Analysis in the academic year of 2015 / 2016 with the researcher. E. Review of Related Literature\",\"PeriodicalId\":34019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching\",\"volume\":\"163 9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v1i1.234\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metathesis Journal of English Language Literature and Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31002/metathesis.v1i1.234","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,UIN Walisongo Semarang没有一个基于Moodle的页面,这是一个专为学生和讲师设计的混合学习课程。因此,一个基于Moodle模型的http://daviqr.com页面创建和开发。这是设计研究与发展的研究。该研究的参与者是九、六年级英语教育学院、九年级教师、勒瓦利斯永戈三宝垄,他们在2016年20月15日的学习中接受了专业分析分析课程。本研究采用的工具是开源型和封闭问题的问卷调查。根据之前的研究,学生对在线讨论论坛、在线测验和在线教学材料非常感兴趣。学生认为由教学材料和论坛模块组成的材料模块的概念可以应用于其他教学。他们认为讲师不仅在教室里教授和提供材料,而且他们可以给学生从网上材料中学习的自由。它可以使教授和学生的关系更加紧密。关键字:Moodle-based web courses, discourse analysis, discussion forum, quiz, reading材料A.遥远的发现Walisongo Semarang已经还没有为学生和lecturers的Moodle-based网站做好准备。因此,http://daviqr.com发明并安装Moodle 3.0。有一些流传的原因,为什么大多数学生都同意混合学习课程是一个有趣的课程,为什么他们选择混合课程或传统课堂之间的结合。首先,当然目的和目标是明确的。第二,他们从这个混合课程中学到了很多。第三,阅读材料是清晰和直接的。第四,中期,第一卷,第一卷,2017年4月:2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720第五,整个混合学习与学期学分的数字成正比。与其他学生互动的分量要小得多。第七,他们与其他学生交往的品质再好不过了。8号,他们对教练的兴趣较小。第9条,它们与仪器的互动质量稍微好一些,差不多是一样的。十、比较级的比较级,这个在线课程的内容更重要(大卫·里扎尔,2015)。基于previous research (Daviq Rizal, 2015),学生们享受在线混合学习。在平均水平上,他们在这个课程上花费的时间少于3个小时,包括阅读材料,在线讨论,quizzes和任务。霍夫,大多数学生都没有被更早的性别所吸引,比男性参与调查更女性。在比较混合在线课程的例子中,比如一个主要的在线讨论论坛。来自混合学习变量的学生。每周有一些学生布置作业。而且,他们有有限的时间做测验,所以他们必须匆忙。学生也期待从事实中得到帮助。一些人期望他们有更多的Wifi热点来植入数据连接速度。他们预计为互联网提供许多计算机和访问功能。大多数学生都抱怨互联网的问题。学生们认为混合动力车应该坚持下去。此外,根据我去年的在线评估,大多数学生都同意http://daviqr.com的在线评估非常好。此外,quizzes的在线评估帮助学生了解关于分析主题的知识和技能。此外,网上讨论帮助学生们改进他们的写作和分析技能。http://daviqr.com上的测试非常困难,以便学生们知道他们必须为自己的需求做些什么。答案的关键在于http://daviqr.com上的quizzes对他们的学习非常有帮助。约会和学习活动之间的关系非常好。类似于阅读材料和教师对网络评估的本质的评估。http://daviqr.com上的在线评估:2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 METATHESIS:卷1,卷1,4月2107 64日quizzes的决斗和测试非常少。在http://daviqr.com上,必要的在线资源正在高于平均平均。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lesson and Forum Modules of Http://daviqr.com in the Subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, UIN Walisongo Semarang
Sampai saat ini UIN Walisongo Semarang tidak memiliki sebuah laman berbasis Moodle yaitu sebuah aplikasi hybrid online course yang diperuntukkan bagi mahasiswa dan dosen. Oleh karena itu, sebuah laman yang beralamatkan http://daviqr.com berbasis model Moodle diciptakan dan dikembangkan. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian dengan desain Research and Development. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 90 mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris semester 6, Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, IAIN Walisongo Semarang yang mengambil mata kuliah Discourse Analysis pada tahun akademik 2015/2016. Instrumen yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini berupa kuesioner dengan model open-ended and closedended questions. Merujuk pada hasil penelitian sebelumnya, siswa mempunyai ketertarikan tinggi pada forum-forum diskusi online, kuis berbasis daring, dan materi ajar berbasis daring. Mahasiswa berpendapat bahwa konsep modul materi yang terdiri atas materi ajar dan modul forum dapat diimplementasikan untuk pengajaran lainnya. Mereka berpendapat bahwa dosen tidak hanya mengajar dan memberikan materi di ruang kelas, tetapi mereka dapat memberikan kebebasan pada mahasiswa untuk belajar dari sumber materi online. Hal ini dapat membuat hubungan dosen dan siswa menjadi lebih kuat dan dekat. Kata Kunci: Moodle-based websites, hybrid online courses, discourse analysis, discussion forum, quiz, reading materials A. Background of the Study So far UIN Walisongo Semarang has not been ready yet for a Moodle-based website for students and lecturers. Hence, http://daviqr.com/ was created and installed with Moodle 3.0. There are some main reasons why most students agree that the blended learning course is an interesting course and why they prefer the hybrid online course or the combination between online and traditional classroom. First, the course outline and objectives were made clearly. Second, they learned a lot from this hybrid course. Third, the reading materials were clear and informative. Fourth, the METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 63 level of this hybrid course is just right. Fifth, the total study load of this hybrid course is in proportion to the number of semester credits is just right. Sixth, the amount of the interaction with other students is a little better. Seventh, the quality of their interaction with other students is a little better. Eighth, the amount of their interaction with the instructor is a little better. Ninth, the quality of their interaction with the instructor is a little better and about the same. Tenth, compared to a faceto-face (traditional) class of equal credits, the workload of this online course is somewhat more (Daviq Rizal, 2015). Based on the previous research (Daviq Rizal, 2015), students enjoy hybrid online learning. Indeed on average they spent less than three hours on this course including reading materials, online discussions, quizzes, and assignments. However, most students had not enrolled in any classes previously and more female than male participated in the survey. In terms of the components of hybrid online course students like was mostly online discussion forum. What students disliked from blended learning varied. Some students disliked the assignment every week. Also, they had limited time to do the quiz so that they had to rush. Students also expected help from the faculty. Some of them expected more Wifi hot-spots to improve the data connection speed. They expected the faculty to provide many computers and access to the Internet. Mostly, students were complaint about the Internet connection in the faculty. Students thought that the hybrid online courses should continue. Moreover, based on my last year research on online assessment, most students agreed that the access to online assessment of http://daviqr.com was very good. Besides, the online assessment in quizzes helped students to develop their knowledge and skills in the subject of Discourse Analysis. Moreover, the online discussions helped students to improve their writing and analytical skills. The tests in http://daviqr.com were specified sufficiently for students to know what they had to do for their needs. The answer keys of the quizzes in http://daviqr.com were very helpful to their learning. The relationship between examinations and learning activities was excellent. Appropriateness of assigned materials such as reading materials and teacher presentation to the nature of online assessment was above average. Online assessments in http://daviqr.com made students cheat and not cheat p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2107 64 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching during quizzes and examinations. The duration of the quizzes and tests was very short. The availability of necessary online resources in http://daviqr.com was above average. Honestly interestingly there were 2 students admitted that they cheated their friends’ work during online assessment. However, most students admitted neutral. Online assessment was the same as offline assessment. Compared to other college assessments, the intellectual challenge of the online assessment presented in http://daviqr.com was average. Compared to other college assessments, the amount of efforts required to succeed in this online assessment was average. On average, students spent 31 – 45 minutes on the online assessments. Students overall evaluation of the online assessment in http//:daviqr.com was good. In brief, the needs of creating Moodle websites for students and lecturers are a must as quick as possible. Besides, the needs for researching such Moodle are an option for English language teachers and lecturers of other subjects. B. Research Questions 1. How is the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 2. How is the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang? 3. How do students of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang ? C. Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study are to describe the creation and development of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0of http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com towards students of English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang, and students’ METATHESIS, Vol. 1, No. 1, April 2017 p-ISSN: 2580-2712 e-ISSN: 2580-2720 Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching 65 responses of English Department respond towards the implementation of Lesson and Forum module in Moodle 3.0 http://daviqr.com in the subject of Discourse Analysis in the English Department in the Faculty of Teachers Training and Education UIN Walisongo Semarang. D. Limitation of the study The research is limited to the population of the English Departments students of UIN Walisongo Semarang taking the subject of Discourse Analysis in the academic year of 2015 / 2016 with the researcher. E. Review of Related Literature
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信