多维风险沟通:关于新出现流行病期间风险的公众话语

Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, Kathleen H. Pine, Elisa Ladaw, Harold Kim, Eli Suzuki-Gill, Yunan Chen
{"title":"多维风险沟通:关于新出现流行病期间风险的公众话语","authors":"Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, Kathleen H. Pine, Elisa Ladaw, Harold Kim, Eli Suzuki-Gill, Yunan Chen","doi":"10.1145/3173574.3173788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crisis informatics has examined how institutions and individuals seek, communicate, and curate information in response to crises. The public's communication and perception of risks on social media remain understudied. In this study, we report a qualitative analysis of public perceptions of risks and risk management measures on Reddit during the Zika crisis, an emerging epidemic associated with high uncertainty regarding pathology, epidemiology, and broad consequences. We found two types of perceived risks: ones directly caused by the Zika virus, and ones potentially introduced by authorities' risk management measures. Risk perceptions unfolded along multiple dimensions beyond the imminent and personal level. Reddit users discussed in a speculative way to foresee various risks in the long run or at larger geographical scales. We discuss the multidimensionality and speculative nature of risk perception on social media, and derive implications for crisis informatics research and public health research and practice.","PeriodicalId":20512,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional Risk Communication: Public Discourse on Risks during an Emerging Epidemic\",\"authors\":\"Xinning Gui, Yubo Kou, Kathleen H. Pine, Elisa Ladaw, Harold Kim, Eli Suzuki-Gill, Yunan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3173574.3173788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Crisis informatics has examined how institutions and individuals seek, communicate, and curate information in response to crises. The public's communication and perception of risks on social media remain understudied. In this study, we report a qualitative analysis of public perceptions of risks and risk management measures on Reddit during the Zika crisis, an emerging epidemic associated with high uncertainty regarding pathology, epidemiology, and broad consequences. We found two types of perceived risks: ones directly caused by the Zika virus, and ones potentially introduced by authorities' risk management measures. Risk perceptions unfolded along multiple dimensions beyond the imminent and personal level. Reddit users discussed in a speculative way to foresee various risks in the long run or at larger geographical scales. We discuss the multidimensionality and speculative nature of risk perception on social media, and derive implications for crisis informatics research and public health research and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

危机信息学研究了机构和个人在应对危机时如何寻求、沟通和管理信息。公众在社交媒体上的沟通和对风险的认知仍未得到充分研究。在这项研究中,我们报告了一项关于寨卡危机期间Reddit上公众对风险和风险管理措施的看法的定性分析,寨卡危机是一种新兴的流行病,在病理学、流行病学和广泛后果方面具有高度不确定性。我们发现了两种感知风险:一种是由寨卡病毒直接引起的,另一种可能是由当局的风险管理措施引入的。风险感知在迫在眉睫和个人层面之外的多个维度展开。Reddit用户以一种投机的方式讨论,以预见长期或更大的地理范围内的各种风险。我们讨论了社交媒体上风险感知的多维性和投机性质,并得出危机信息学研究和公共卫生研究与实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multidimensional Risk Communication: Public Discourse on Risks during an Emerging Epidemic
Crisis informatics has examined how institutions and individuals seek, communicate, and curate information in response to crises. The public's communication and perception of risks on social media remain understudied. In this study, we report a qualitative analysis of public perceptions of risks and risk management measures on Reddit during the Zika crisis, an emerging epidemic associated with high uncertainty regarding pathology, epidemiology, and broad consequences. We found two types of perceived risks: ones directly caused by the Zika virus, and ones potentially introduced by authorities' risk management measures. Risk perceptions unfolded along multiple dimensions beyond the imminent and personal level. Reddit users discussed in a speculative way to foresee various risks in the long run or at larger geographical scales. We discuss the multidimensionality and speculative nature of risk perception on social media, and derive implications for crisis informatics research and public health research and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信