投资者情绪、横截面股票收益和卖空:来自韩国的证据

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Hyonyong Lee
{"title":"投资者情绪、横截面股票收益和卖空:来自韩国的证据","authors":"Hyonyong Lee","doi":"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study investigates the return co-movements associated with investor sentiment shifts in the cross-sections under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. \nDesign/methodology/approach: This study estimates the return sensitivity to market sentiment changes (sentiment beta) for each characteristic's portfolio by regressing the return of each quintile portfolio and various high-minus-low portfolios on the sentiment changes index. It examines whether these cross-sectionally different return co-movement patterns is more prevalent during good- than bad-sentiment periods by performing the same regression separately for the good- and bad-sentiment periods. \nFindings: The result shows that the returns of speculative stocks tend to co-move more strongly with sentiment changes than those of stable stocks, in the sense that speculative stocks have higher sentiment betas than stable stocks. The cross-sectional pattern in return co-movements becomes more pronounced during the good-sentiment period but disappears during the bad-sentiment periods. \nResearch limitations/implications: This study elucidates the return co-movement behavior associated with investor sentiment changes under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. However, analyzing the relationship between the investment sentiment index and the short-selling activities is reserved for future research. \nOriginality/value: The results provide important implications for investment strategies using investor sentiment in practice, and several suggestions for establishing investor protection policies in the highly individual-crowded market. This study will contribute to enhancing the stock market efficiency and price discovery.","PeriodicalId":35226,"journal":{"name":"Global Business and Finance Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investor Sentiment, Cross-sectional Stock Returns, and Short-Sales: Evidence From Korea\",\"authors\":\"Hyonyong Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: This study investigates the return co-movements associated with investor sentiment shifts in the cross-sections under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. \\nDesign/methodology/approach: This study estimates the return sensitivity to market sentiment changes (sentiment beta) for each characteristic's portfolio by regressing the return of each quintile portfolio and various high-minus-low portfolios on the sentiment changes index. It examines whether these cross-sectionally different return co-movement patterns is more prevalent during good- than bad-sentiment periods by performing the same regression separately for the good- and bad-sentiment periods. \\nFindings: The result shows that the returns of speculative stocks tend to co-move more strongly with sentiment changes than those of stable stocks, in the sense that speculative stocks have higher sentiment betas than stable stocks. The cross-sectional pattern in return co-movements becomes more pronounced during the good-sentiment period but disappears during the bad-sentiment periods. \\nResearch limitations/implications: This study elucidates the return co-movement behavior associated with investor sentiment changes under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. However, analyzing the relationship between the investment sentiment index and the short-selling activities is reserved for future research. \\nOriginality/value: The results provide important implications for investment strategies using investor sentiment in practice, and several suggestions for establishing investor protection policies in the highly individual-crowded market. This study will contribute to enhancing the stock market efficiency and price discovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Business and Finance Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Business and Finance Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17549/gbfr.2023.28.3.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了在市场情绪与卖空障碍相互作用的情况下,与投资者情绪变化相关的回报协同运动。设计/方法/方法:本研究通过回归每个五分位数投资组合和各种高-低投资组合对情绪变化指数的回报来估计每个特征投资组合对市场情绪变化的回报敏感性(情绪贝塔)。它通过对好情绪和坏情绪时期分别执行相同的回归来检验这些横截面不同的回报共同运动模式是否在好情绪时期比坏情绪时期更普遍。研究发现:与稳定股相比,投机股的收益更倾向于与情绪变化密切相关,即投机股的情绪贝塔系数高于稳定股。在情绪良好的时期,回报共同运动的横截面模式变得更加明显,而在情绪不好的时期则消失。研究局限/启示:本研究阐明了在市场整体情绪与卖空障碍相互作用的情况下,与投资者情绪变化相关的回报共动行为。然而,分析投资情绪指数与卖空行为之间的关系,有待于未来的研究。原创性/价值:研究结果为在实践中利用投资者情绪的投资策略提供了重要启示,并为在高度个人拥挤的市场中建立投资者保护政策提供了一些建议。本研究将有助于提高股票市场效率与价格发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investor Sentiment, Cross-sectional Stock Returns, and Short-Sales: Evidence From Korea
Purpose: This study investigates the return co-movements associated with investor sentiment shifts in the cross-sections under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. Design/methodology/approach: This study estimates the return sensitivity to market sentiment changes (sentiment beta) for each characteristic's portfolio by regressing the return of each quintile portfolio and various high-minus-low portfolios on the sentiment changes index. It examines whether these cross-sectionally different return co-movement patterns is more prevalent during good- than bad-sentiment periods by performing the same regression separately for the good- and bad-sentiment periods. Findings: The result shows that the returns of speculative stocks tend to co-move more strongly with sentiment changes than those of stable stocks, in the sense that speculative stocks have higher sentiment betas than stable stocks. The cross-sectional pattern in return co-movements becomes more pronounced during the good-sentiment period but disappears during the bad-sentiment periods. Research limitations/implications: This study elucidates the return co-movement behavior associated with investor sentiment changes under a setting where market-wide sentiment interacts with short-sale impediments. However, analyzing the relationship between the investment sentiment index and the short-selling activities is reserved for future research. Originality/value: The results provide important implications for investment strategies using investor sentiment in practice, and several suggestions for establishing investor protection policies in the highly individual-crowded market. This study will contribute to enhancing the stock market efficiency and price discovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Business and Finance Review
Global Business and Finance Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信