{"title":"利妥昔单抗输注反应:管理算法","authors":"D. Ivanov, I. Zavalna","doi":"10.22141/2307-1257.11.2.2022.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Allergic reactions to rituximab, which have been used for the past 20 years, are common in 32–62 % of patients. The purpose of the study: to develop an algorithm for controlling adverse reactions that occur during the introduction of rituximab. Materials and methods. The personal experience of treatment of 46 patients with various kidney diseases who received rituximab according to the indications according to the established diagnosis was analyzed. Evaluation of infusion allergic reactions was performed according to P.М. Kasi et al. (2012) for 5 classes of side effects. Results. It was found that allergic reactions to rituximab occurred in 46 % of patients in the range from 1 to 4 classes. The probability of their occurrence according to the class was almost the same, but somewhat less documented for the 4th grade. Re-administration of diphenhydramine, methylprednisolone 125 mg or hydrocortisone 125 mg, if necessary salbutamol, oxygen allowed to eliminate most of the reaction, and then resumed the introduction of rituximab, starting from 25 mg/h, gradually increasing to 300 mg/h. This administration, performed 1–2 times, was effective in 1–3 classes of allergic reactions. For fourth grade, one patient required omalizumab. Generalized experience allowed to give a graphical and descriptive algorithm of actions in case of infusion side effects for rituximab. Conclusions. Based on special data and literature analysis, an algorithm for controlling infusion allergic reactions with intravenous rituximab was formulated.","PeriodicalId":17874,"journal":{"name":"KIDNEYS","volume":"53 210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infusion reactions to rituximab administration: algorithm of management\",\"authors\":\"D. Ivanov, I. Zavalna\",\"doi\":\"10.22141/2307-1257.11.2.2022.364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background. Allergic reactions to rituximab, which have been used for the past 20 years, are common in 32–62 % of patients. The purpose of the study: to develop an algorithm for controlling adverse reactions that occur during the introduction of rituximab. Materials and methods. The personal experience of treatment of 46 patients with various kidney diseases who received rituximab according to the indications according to the established diagnosis was analyzed. Evaluation of infusion allergic reactions was performed according to P.М. Kasi et al. (2012) for 5 classes of side effects. Results. It was found that allergic reactions to rituximab occurred in 46 % of patients in the range from 1 to 4 classes. The probability of their occurrence according to the class was almost the same, but somewhat less documented for the 4th grade. Re-administration of diphenhydramine, methylprednisolone 125 mg or hydrocortisone 125 mg, if necessary salbutamol, oxygen allowed to eliminate most of the reaction, and then resumed the introduction of rituximab, starting from 25 mg/h, gradually increasing to 300 mg/h. This administration, performed 1–2 times, was effective in 1–3 classes of allergic reactions. For fourth grade, one patient required omalizumab. Generalized experience allowed to give a graphical and descriptive algorithm of actions in case of infusion side effects for rituximab. Conclusions. Based on special data and literature analysis, an algorithm for controlling infusion allergic reactions with intravenous rituximab was formulated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KIDNEYS\",\"volume\":\"53 210 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KIDNEYS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22141/2307-1257.11.2.2022.364\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KIDNEYS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22141/2307-1257.11.2.2022.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
背景。对利妥昔单抗的过敏反应在32 - 62%的患者中很常见,利妥昔单抗已经使用了20年。本研究的目的:开发一种算法来控制引入利妥昔单抗期间发生的不良反应。材料和方法。分析46例不同肾脏疾病患者根据既定诊断,根据适应症接受利妥昔单抗治疗的个人经验。输液过敏反应评价参照P.М。Kasi et al.(2012)研究了5类副作用。结果。结果发现,在1 ~ 4级患者中,46%的患者发生了对利妥昔单抗的过敏反应。根据班级的不同,发生这种情况的概率几乎相同,但四年级的记录较少。重新给予苯海拉明、甲基强的松125mg或氢化可的松125mg,必要时给予沙丁胺醇,使氧消除大部分反应,然后恢复引入利妥昔单抗,从25mg /h开始,逐渐增加到300mg /h。本药1-2次,对1-3类过敏反应有效。对于四年级,一名患者需要使用omalizumab。广义经验允许给出一个图形和描述性算法的行动,在情况下输注副作用的利妥昔单抗。结论。在特殊数据和文献分析的基础上,制定了一种控制静脉注射利妥昔单抗输液过敏反应的算法。
Infusion reactions to rituximab administration: algorithm of management
Background. Allergic reactions to rituximab, which have been used for the past 20 years, are common in 32–62 % of patients. The purpose of the study: to develop an algorithm for controlling adverse reactions that occur during the introduction of rituximab. Materials and methods. The personal experience of treatment of 46 patients with various kidney diseases who received rituximab according to the indications according to the established diagnosis was analyzed. Evaluation of infusion allergic reactions was performed according to P.М. Kasi et al. (2012) for 5 classes of side effects. Results. It was found that allergic reactions to rituximab occurred in 46 % of patients in the range from 1 to 4 classes. The probability of their occurrence according to the class was almost the same, but somewhat less documented for the 4th grade. Re-administration of diphenhydramine, methylprednisolone 125 mg or hydrocortisone 125 mg, if necessary salbutamol, oxygen allowed to eliminate most of the reaction, and then resumed the introduction of rituximab, starting from 25 mg/h, gradually increasing to 300 mg/h. This administration, performed 1–2 times, was effective in 1–3 classes of allergic reactions. For fourth grade, one patient required omalizumab. Generalized experience allowed to give a graphical and descriptive algorithm of actions in case of infusion side effects for rituximab. Conclusions. Based on special data and literature analysis, an algorithm for controlling infusion allergic reactions with intravenous rituximab was formulated.