Evaluations and utilizations of extended criteria donor kidneys

Objective To explore the evaluations and recipient selection methods of extended criteria donor (ECD) kidney donation in the death of citizens and analyze the transplantation outcomes. Methods From January to September 2019, the clinical data of donor-recipients were retrospectively studied. The recipients of ECD donor kidneys not evaluated for kidney zero puncture assessment from January 2014 to July 2016 were group A1 and those receiving standard donor kidney (SCD) belonged to group A2. From August 2016 to March 2019, all DCD donors were routinely evaluated for kidney zero puncture and those receiving ECD recipients fell into Group B1 and those receiving SCD belonged to Group B2. Analysis was performed for ECD/SCD donor renal zero puncture pathological features and lesion degree and utilization of ECD donor kidney; donor-recipient body surface area (BSA) ratio and lesion degree of ECD donor kidney on recipient selecting and matching. Serum creatinine value, perioperative adverse events and 1-year follow-up of human/kidney survival rate in each group were compared at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Results A total of 108, 264, 306 and 416 recipients were recruited into A1, A2, B1 and B2 groups respectively. The ECD donor renal utilization rate was 88.5% vs 93.3% during two time periods. According to the 2016 Banff standard, glomerular sclerosis (GS), renal interstitial fibrosis (Ci) and intimal fibrosis thickening (Cv), small arterial intimal hyalinization (ah), tubular atrophy (ct) and acute tubular injury (ati) accounted for more than B1 group than B2 group (P<0.05). The severity of ECD donor kidney disease, BSA ratio <1.1 group and ≥1.1 group 1 week, 1 month, 3 months postoperative blood creatinine value was lower than the former while declining amplitude of blood creatinine was higher. A significant difference existed in the degree of moderate lesions in donor kidney (P<0.05). After 1 year, serum creatinine value of B1 group was lower than that of A1 group (P<0.05). Conclusions The quality of ECD donor kidney is obviously inferior to that of SCD donor kidney. The Banff donor kidney criterion is an effective mode of evaluating the quality of ECD donor kidney. Based upon the extent of Banff's nephropathy, the ratio of donor/recipient BSA is an important selecting method for ECD donors to receive kidneys and recipients, ultimately improving graft utilization and recipient transplantation. Key words: Kidney transplantation; Renal needle biopsy; Body surface area