尾侧硬膜外布比卡因与布比卡因加芬太尼及布比卡因加新斯的明用于小儿脐下手术麻醉及术后镇痛的比较研究

Mizanur Rahman, Md Habibur Rahmn, M. Kamrujjaman, Md Shafiqul Islam
{"title":"尾侧硬膜外布比卡因与布比卡因加芬太尼及布比卡因加新斯的明用于小儿脐下手术麻醉及术后镇痛的比较研究","authors":"Mizanur Rahman, Md Habibur Rahmn, M. Kamrujjaman, Md Shafiqul Islam","doi":"10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Single-shot caudal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic has a limited duration of action.Therefore, many children undergoing sub-umbilical surgery with caudal analgesia require furtheranalgesia during the postoperative period. This study compared the effect of single-dose caudal epiduralbupivacaine, bupivacaine plus fentanyl and bupivacaine plus neostigmine for anaesthesia andpostoperative analgesia in children.\nObjective: To evaluate effectiveness of bupivacaine with the addition of fentanyl or neostigmine forcaudal anaesthesia and analgesia in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries.\nMethods: Total ninety (90) paediatric patients, aged 2-8 years with ASA(American society ofanesthesiologist) grades I & II who were scheduled for surgery in Sher-E-Bangla Medical college Hospital,Barisal were included in this study. Data were collected by using a pre-designed questionnaire. Thepatients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. Group A was received caudal 1 ml/kg ofbupivacaine 0.25%, Group B 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 1 μg/kg and Group C 1 ml/kgof bupivacaine 0.25% with neostigmine 2 μg/kg. Heart rate (HR), Blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation(SpO2), Respiratory rate (RR) were recorded during operation and every five minutes thereafter. Theduration of analgesia was defined as the time from caudal injection to first dose of rescue analgesia.Rescue analgesia was given for an objective pain scale (greater than or equal to) 4 in the form of oralparacetamol (15mg/kg).\nResults: Assessment of anaesthesia was significantly longer in the two groups of children who receivedadditives compared with local anaesthetics group alone (p<0.01). Mean time to first postoperativeanalgesic administration was 167.37±17.30 min, 280.57±14.40min, and 357.77±19.08 min in groupA, Group B, and group C respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.01) between thethree groups. In these cases duration of analgesia was considered from the placement of caudal to firstanalgesia.\nConclusion: Addition of fentanyl or neostigmine to bupivacaine prolonged the duration of surgicalanaesthesia and postoperative analgesia after a single shot caudal injection with minimal incidence ofside effects in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries. This could be a safe and cheap alternative toextradural catheter placement for surgical procedures of intermediate duration.\nJBSA 2019; 32(1): 3-9","PeriodicalId":17242,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of caudal epidural bupivacaine with bupivacaine plus fentanyl and bupivacaine plus neostigmine for anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries\",\"authors\":\"Mizanur Rahman, Md Habibur Rahmn, M. Kamrujjaman, Md Shafiqul Islam\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Single-shot caudal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic has a limited duration of action.Therefore, many children undergoing sub-umbilical surgery with caudal analgesia require furtheranalgesia during the postoperative period. This study compared the effect of single-dose caudal epiduralbupivacaine, bupivacaine plus fentanyl and bupivacaine plus neostigmine for anaesthesia andpostoperative analgesia in children.\\nObjective: To evaluate effectiveness of bupivacaine with the addition of fentanyl or neostigmine forcaudal anaesthesia and analgesia in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries.\\nMethods: Total ninety (90) paediatric patients, aged 2-8 years with ASA(American society ofanesthesiologist) grades I & II who were scheduled for surgery in Sher-E-Bangla Medical college Hospital,Barisal were included in this study. Data were collected by using a pre-designed questionnaire. Thepatients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. Group A was received caudal 1 ml/kg ofbupivacaine 0.25%, Group B 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 1 μg/kg and Group C 1 ml/kgof bupivacaine 0.25% with neostigmine 2 μg/kg. Heart rate (HR), Blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation(SpO2), Respiratory rate (RR) were recorded during operation and every five minutes thereafter. Theduration of analgesia was defined as the time from caudal injection to first dose of rescue analgesia.Rescue analgesia was given for an objective pain scale (greater than or equal to) 4 in the form of oralparacetamol (15mg/kg).\\nResults: Assessment of anaesthesia was significantly longer in the two groups of children who receivedadditives compared with local anaesthetics group alone (p<0.01). Mean time to first postoperativeanalgesic administration was 167.37±17.30 min, 280.57±14.40min, and 357.77±19.08 min in groupA, Group B, and group C respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.01) between thethree groups. In these cases duration of analgesia was considered from the placement of caudal to firstanalgesia.\\nConclusion: Addition of fentanyl or neostigmine to bupivacaine prolonged the duration of surgicalanaesthesia and postoperative analgesia after a single shot caudal injection with minimal incidence ofside effects in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries. This could be a safe and cheap alternative toextradural catheter placement for surgical procedures of intermediate duration.\\nJBSA 2019; 32(1): 3-9\",\"PeriodicalId\":17242,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66546\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Bangladesh Society of Anaesthesiologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jbsa.v32i1.66546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单针尾侧麻醉加局部麻醉作用时间有限。因此,许多接受脐下手术的儿童在术后需要进一步的尾侧镇痛。本研究比较了单剂量硬膜外布比卡因、布比卡因加芬太尼和布比卡因加新斯的明用于儿童麻醉和术后镇痛的效果。目的:评价布比卡因与芬太尼或新斯的明联合应用于小儿脐下手术的麻醉镇痛效果。方法:在Barisal Sher-E-Bangla医学院附属医院行手术的90例儿童患者,年龄2-8岁,ASA(美国麻醉医师协会)分级为I级和II级。使用预先设计的问卷收集数据。患者被随机分配到三组中的一组。A组给予布比卡因0.25%剂量1 ml/kg, B组给予布比卡因0.25%剂量1 ml/kg,芬太尼1 μg/kg, C组给予布比卡因0.25%剂量1 ml/kg,新斯的明2 μg/kg。术中及术后每5分钟记录患者心率(HR)、血压(BP)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)、呼吸频率(RR)。镇痛持续时间定义为从尾侧注射到第一次抢救镇痛的时间。以口服扑热息痛(15mg/kg)的形式给予客观疼痛评分(大于或等于)4的抢救镇痛。结果:两组患儿使用添加剂的麻醉评估时间明显长于单纯局部麻醉组(p<0.01)。a组、B组、C组术后首次给药平均时间分别为167.37±17.30 min、280.57±14.40min、357.77±19.08 min。三组间差异有统计学意义(p<0.01)。在这些病例中,镇痛的持续时间从尾侧放置到第一次镇痛。结论:在布比卡因基础上加用芬太尼或新斯的明可延长手术麻醉和术后镇痛时间,且副反应发生率极低。这可能是一种安全、廉价的替代硬膜外置管的中期外科手术。JBSA 2019;32 (1): 3 - 9
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comparative study of caudal epidural bupivacaine with bupivacaine plus fentanyl and bupivacaine plus neostigmine for anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries
Background: Single-shot caudal anaesthesia with local anaesthetic has a limited duration of action.Therefore, many children undergoing sub-umbilical surgery with caudal analgesia require furtheranalgesia during the postoperative period. This study compared the effect of single-dose caudal epiduralbupivacaine, bupivacaine plus fentanyl and bupivacaine plus neostigmine for anaesthesia andpostoperative analgesia in children. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of bupivacaine with the addition of fentanyl or neostigmine forcaudal anaesthesia and analgesia in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries. Methods: Total ninety (90) paediatric patients, aged 2-8 years with ASA(American society ofanesthesiologist) grades I & II who were scheduled for surgery in Sher-E-Bangla Medical college Hospital,Barisal were included in this study. Data were collected by using a pre-designed questionnaire. Thepatients were randomly allocated to one of the three groups. Group A was received caudal 1 ml/kg ofbupivacaine 0.25%, Group B 1 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% with fentanyl 1 μg/kg and Group C 1 ml/kgof bupivacaine 0.25% with neostigmine 2 μg/kg. Heart rate (HR), Blood pressure (BP), oxygen saturation(SpO2), Respiratory rate (RR) were recorded during operation and every five minutes thereafter. Theduration of analgesia was defined as the time from caudal injection to first dose of rescue analgesia.Rescue analgesia was given for an objective pain scale (greater than or equal to) 4 in the form of oralparacetamol (15mg/kg). Results: Assessment of anaesthesia was significantly longer in the two groups of children who receivedadditives compared with local anaesthetics group alone (p<0.01). Mean time to first postoperativeanalgesic administration was 167.37±17.30 min, 280.57±14.40min, and 357.77±19.08 min in groupA, Group B, and group C respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p<0.01) between thethree groups. In these cases duration of analgesia was considered from the placement of caudal to firstanalgesia. Conclusion: Addition of fentanyl or neostigmine to bupivacaine prolonged the duration of surgicalanaesthesia and postoperative analgesia after a single shot caudal injection with minimal incidence ofside effects in children undergoing sub-umbilical surgeries. This could be a safe and cheap alternative toextradural catheter placement for surgical procedures of intermediate duration. JBSA 2019; 32(1): 3-9
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信