避税与股权定价:国家法律制度和信息披露法规的重要性

Tax eJournal Pub Date : 2021-08-30 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3914068
Ruiyuan Chen, Sadok El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Yang Yang
{"title":"避税与股权定价:国家法律制度和信息披露法规的重要性","authors":"Ruiyuan Chen, Sadok El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Yang Yang","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3914068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on Desai and Dharmapala’s (2006) complementarity theory on the relation between tax avoidance and insider diversion, we contribute to international research by examining the importance of tax avoidance to equity pricing, and the role that institutional environments play in shaping this link. Our theoretical framework generates two predictions. First, investors require higher risk premium compensation for their exposure to insiders’ diversion of corporate resources hidden by obfuscatory tax avoidance activities. Second, stronger country-level legal institutions and disclosure regulations mitigate this impact. Analyzing a sample of firms from 47 non-U.S. countries, we report strong evidence that equity financing costs rise when firms take more aggressive tax positions. Additional analysis implies that stricter investor protection institutions and disclosure regulations alleviate investors’ concerns about insider diversion, moderating the positive impact of tax avoidance on equity pricing. The results are robust to specifying alternative measures of tax avoidance and equity financing costs, as well as to addressing endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest that investors recognize the complementarity between insider diversion and tax avoidance in less protective environments. Our evidence has major implications for investors and policy makers.","PeriodicalId":22313,"journal":{"name":"Tax eJournal","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations\",\"authors\":\"Ruiyuan Chen, Sadok El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, Jeffrey A. Pittman, Yang Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3914068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on Desai and Dharmapala’s (2006) complementarity theory on the relation between tax avoidance and insider diversion, we contribute to international research by examining the importance of tax avoidance to equity pricing, and the role that institutional environments play in shaping this link. Our theoretical framework generates two predictions. First, investors require higher risk premium compensation for their exposure to insiders’ diversion of corporate resources hidden by obfuscatory tax avoidance activities. Second, stronger country-level legal institutions and disclosure regulations mitigate this impact. Analyzing a sample of firms from 47 non-U.S. countries, we report strong evidence that equity financing costs rise when firms take more aggressive tax positions. Additional analysis implies that stricter investor protection institutions and disclosure regulations alleviate investors’ concerns about insider diversion, moderating the positive impact of tax avoidance on equity pricing. The results are robust to specifying alternative measures of tax avoidance and equity financing costs, as well as to addressing endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest that investors recognize the complementarity between insider diversion and tax avoidance in less protective environments. Our evidence has major implications for investors and policy makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tax eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tax eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3914068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Desai和Dharmapala(2006)关于避税和内部人转移之间关系的互补性理论的基础上,我们通过研究避税对股票定价的重要性,以及制度环境在形成这种联系方面所起的作用,为国际研究做出了贡献。我们的理论框架产生了两个预测。首先,投资者需要更高的风险溢价补偿,因为他们暴露在内部人士转移企业资源的行为中,这些资源隐藏在模糊的避税活动中。其次,加强国家层面的法律制度和信息披露法规可以减轻这种影响。分析了47家非美国公司的样本。我们报告了强有力的证据表明,当企业采取更积极的税收政策时,股权融资成本会上升。进一步的分析表明,更严格的投资者保护制度和披露法规缓解了投资者对内幕转移的担忧,从而缓和了避税对股票定价的积极影响。结果是稳健的指定替代措施的避税和股权融资成本,以及解决内生性。总的来说,这些发现表明,投资者认识到在保护程度较低的环境中,内部人转移和避税之间存在互补性。我们的证据对投资者和政策制定者具有重大意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tax Avoidance and Equity Pricing: The Importance of Countries’ Legal Institutions and Disclosure Regulations
Building on Desai and Dharmapala’s (2006) complementarity theory on the relation between tax avoidance and insider diversion, we contribute to international research by examining the importance of tax avoidance to equity pricing, and the role that institutional environments play in shaping this link. Our theoretical framework generates two predictions. First, investors require higher risk premium compensation for their exposure to insiders’ diversion of corporate resources hidden by obfuscatory tax avoidance activities. Second, stronger country-level legal institutions and disclosure regulations mitigate this impact. Analyzing a sample of firms from 47 non-U.S. countries, we report strong evidence that equity financing costs rise when firms take more aggressive tax positions. Additional analysis implies that stricter investor protection institutions and disclosure regulations alleviate investors’ concerns about insider diversion, moderating the positive impact of tax avoidance on equity pricing. The results are robust to specifying alternative measures of tax avoidance and equity financing costs, as well as to addressing endogeneity. Collectively, these findings suggest that investors recognize the complementarity between insider diversion and tax avoidance in less protective environments. Our evidence has major implications for investors and policy makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信