IF 0.1 4区 历史学 Q4 HISTORY
Lena Andersson-Skog, M. Eriksson
{"title":"Det sammanflätade intresset","authors":"Lena Andersson-Skog, M. Eriksson","doi":"10.47868/SCANDIA.V87I1.23252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on the interaction between the state and Swedish banks during the establishment of two institutes for small business credit, AB Industrikredit and AB Företagskredit, between 1958 and 1962. These institutes were established as intermediaries between the supplementary pension system and the credit market. We have been able to elucidate this process by the Swedish Bankers’ Association granting us privileged access to archival material on these negotiations. \nIt is demonstrated that the strong ideological conflict characterizing the parliamentary debate on the supplementary pensions system did not spill over into the system being implemented within the financial sector as this was organized through the examined credit institutes. Instead, the banks and the state were able to negotiate through established channels and arenas for business-government relations in the financial sector. Even if the parties initially exhibited mistrust based on different historical interpretations of the market for small business credit, they also recognized the degree of change that would be brought on by the supplementary pension system with regard to the financial markets and capital formation as a whole. Hence, they downplayed ideological differences and strived to reach an outcomethat was mutually beneficial in its final form. A crucial indication of this consensus is that fifty percent of each institute was owned by the state while the other fifty percent was owned by the banks.","PeriodicalId":42706,"journal":{"name":"Scandia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandia","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47868/SCANDIA.V87I1.23252","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点研究1958年至1962年间,国家和瑞典银行在两家小企业信贷机构AB Industrikredit和AB Företagskredit成立期间的互动。这些机构是作为补充养恤金制度和信贷市场之间的中介而设立的。我们得以阐明这一过程,是因为瑞典银行家协会授予我们查阅这些谈判档案材料的特权。这表明,国会对补充年金制度的争论所表现出的强烈的意识形态冲突,并没有波及到金融部门内部正在实施的制度,因为这是通过被审查的信贷机构组织的。相反,银行和国家能够通过已建立的渠道和领域就金融领域的政商关系进行谈判。即使当事各方最初由于对小企业信贷市场的不同历史解释而表现出不信任,它们也认识到补充养恤金制度对整个金融市场和资本形成将带来的变化程度。因此,他们淡化了意识形态上的分歧,努力达成最终形式对双方都有利的结果。这种共识的一个关键迹象是,每个机构的50%归国家所有,而另外50%归银行所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Det sammanflätade intresset
This article focuses on the interaction between the state and Swedish banks during the establishment of two institutes for small business credit, AB Industrikredit and AB Företagskredit, between 1958 and 1962. These institutes were established as intermediaries between the supplementary pension system and the credit market. We have been able to elucidate this process by the Swedish Bankers’ Association granting us privileged access to archival material on these negotiations. It is demonstrated that the strong ideological conflict characterizing the parliamentary debate on the supplementary pensions system did not spill over into the system being implemented within the financial sector as this was organized through the examined credit institutes. Instead, the banks and the state were able to negotiate through established channels and arenas for business-government relations in the financial sector. Even if the parties initially exhibited mistrust based on different historical interpretations of the market for small business credit, they also recognized the degree of change that would be brought on by the supplementary pension system with regard to the financial markets and capital formation as a whole. Hence, they downplayed ideological differences and strived to reach an outcomethat was mutually beneficial in its final form. A crucial indication of this consensus is that fifty percent of each institute was owned by the state while the other fifty percent was owned by the banks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandia
Scandia Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信