{"title":"加尔文主义是共和主义吗?","authors":"P. Cabanel","doi":"10.3406/CALIB.2005.1571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Taking a text by Charles de Villers (1802) as a starting point, this paper revisits the classical debates on the connection or kinship between a particular religion and an economic or political system. Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Weber are summoned in order to endeavour to understand the modes of transfer from Calvinism to the Republic and sometimes also, conversely, from democracy towards imported religions. One has all the less tried to elaborate definite answers as the main task, in this respect, is undoubtedly to ask the question as pointedly as one can.","PeriodicalId":31138,"journal":{"name":"Anglophonia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Le calvinisme est-il républicain ?\",\"authors\":\"P. Cabanel\",\"doi\":\"10.3406/CALIB.2005.1571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Taking a text by Charles de Villers (1802) as a starting point, this paper revisits the classical debates on the connection or kinship between a particular religion and an economic or political system. Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Weber are summoned in order to endeavour to understand the modes of transfer from Calvinism to the Republic and sometimes also, conversely, from democracy towards imported religions. One has all the less tried to elaborate definite answers as the main task, in this respect, is undoubtedly to ask the question as pointedly as one can.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anglophonia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anglophonia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3406/CALIB.2005.1571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anglophonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/CALIB.2005.1571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文以Charles de Villers(1802)的一篇文章为出发点，回顾了关于特定宗教与经济或政治制度之间的联系或亲属关系的古典辩论。孟德斯鸠，托克维尔和韦伯被召来是为了努力理解从加尔文主义到理想国的转变模式，有时也相反，从民主主义到外来宗教的转变模式。尽管如此，人们还是试图给出明确的答案，因为在这方面的主要任务无疑是尽可能有针对性地提出问题。
Taking a text by Charles de Villers (1802) as a starting point, this paper revisits the classical debates on the connection or kinship between a particular religion and an economic or political system. Montesquieu, Tocqueville and Weber are summoned in order to endeavour to understand the modes of transfer from Calvinism to the Republic and sometimes also, conversely, from democracy towards imported religions. One has all the less tried to elaborate definite answers as the main task, in this respect, is undoubtedly to ask the question as pointedly as one can.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
