L. Hall, R. Alden, Ronald D. Anderson, W. D. Killen
{"title":"从加利福尼亚五个水体的十多年生物评估多重压力源研究中,对底栖生物指标和环境压力源的重要性进行排名","authors":"L. Hall, R. Alden, Ronald D. Anderson, W. D. Killen","doi":"10.1080/10934529.2019.1651590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Comprehensive bioassessment multiple stressor field studies were conducted in five waterbodies in the Central Valley, San Francisco and Central Coast areas of California between 2006 and 2017. Samples were collected over multiple years in Pleasant Grove Creek (PGC – 8 years), Kirker Creek (KC – 2 years), Arcade Creek (ARC – 3 years), Salinas streams (SAL – 3 years) and the lower Santa Maria River watershed (SM – 3 years). In each watershed, metrics indicative of physical habitat quality and the relative health of benthic communities were collected, along with measurements of various potential toxicants in sediment (metals and pyrethroids), total organic carbon (TOC) and sediment grain size characteristics. For all waterbodies, pyrethroids have been reported at concentrations suspected to be toxic based on single-species laboratory toxicity tests. The data from all of these studies were assembled into a single data base which was analyzed by a series of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. These analyses were designed to examine overall relationships between benthic community health and environmental quality conditions across the watersheds, as well as to address the following two key questions: (1) Which benthic metrics (response indicators) were the most important to relationships with environmental quality conditions and how do these metrics rank from most to least important? and (2) Which environmental variables (stressors) were the most important in terms of relationships to benthic metrics indicative of community health and how do the stressors rank from most to least important? Consensus ranking of 14 benthic metrics showed that stress tolerant (% Tolerant taxa, Tolerance value and Collectors/gatherers) and stress sensitive (EPT taxa and taxa richness) were the most important. The consensus ranking of 38 environmental variables from most to least important showed that habitat metrics, metals and grain size characteristics were most important for shaping benthic communities while pyrethroids were not reported to be an important stressor across the geographic scope of the watersheds.","PeriodicalId":15733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","volume":"4 1","pages":"1364 - 1386"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking the importance of benthic metrics and environmental stressors from over a decade of bioassessment multiple stressor studies in five California waterbodies\",\"authors\":\"L. Hall, R. Alden, Ronald D. Anderson, W. D. Killen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10934529.2019.1651590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Comprehensive bioassessment multiple stressor field studies were conducted in five waterbodies in the Central Valley, San Francisco and Central Coast areas of California between 2006 and 2017. Samples were collected over multiple years in Pleasant Grove Creek (PGC – 8 years), Kirker Creek (KC – 2 years), Arcade Creek (ARC – 3 years), Salinas streams (SAL – 3 years) and the lower Santa Maria River watershed (SM – 3 years). In each watershed, metrics indicative of physical habitat quality and the relative health of benthic communities were collected, along with measurements of various potential toxicants in sediment (metals and pyrethroids), total organic carbon (TOC) and sediment grain size characteristics. For all waterbodies, pyrethroids have been reported at concentrations suspected to be toxic based on single-species laboratory toxicity tests. The data from all of these studies were assembled into a single data base which was analyzed by a series of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. These analyses were designed to examine overall relationships between benthic community health and environmental quality conditions across the watersheds, as well as to address the following two key questions: (1) Which benthic metrics (response indicators) were the most important to relationships with environmental quality conditions and how do these metrics rank from most to least important? and (2) Which environmental variables (stressors) were the most important in terms of relationships to benthic metrics indicative of community health and how do the stressors rank from most to least important? Consensus ranking of 14 benthic metrics showed that stress tolerant (% Tolerant taxa, Tolerance value and Collectors/gatherers) and stress sensitive (EPT taxa and taxa richness) were the most important. The consensus ranking of 38 environmental variables from most to least important showed that habitat metrics, metals and grain size characteristics were most important for shaping benthic communities while pyrethroids were not reported to be an important stressor across the geographic scope of the watersheds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1364 - 1386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1651590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2019.1651590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
摘要/ Abstract摘要:2006 - 2017年,在加州中央谷、旧金山和中央海岸地区的5个水体中进行了综合生物评价多应激源实地研究。在Pleasant Grove Creek (PGC - 8年)、Kirker Creek (KC - 2年)、Arcade Creek (ARC - 3年)、Salinas溪流(SAL - 3年)和Santa Maria River下游流域(SM - 3年)中收集了多年的样本。在每个流域,收集了指示自然生境质量和底栖生物群落相对健康的指标,以及沉积物中各种潜在毒物(金属和拟除虫菊酯)、总有机碳(TOC)和沉积物粒度特征的测量。根据单物种实验室毒性测试,报告所有水体的拟除虫菊酯类杀虫剂的浓度疑似有毒。所有这些研究的数据被整合到一个单一的数据库中,并通过一系列单变量和多变量统计分析进行分析。这些分析旨在检查整个流域底栖生物群落健康与环境质量条件之间的总体关系,并解决以下两个关键问题:(1)哪些底栖生物指标(响应指标)对与环境质量条件的关系最重要,以及这些指标如何从最重要到最不重要排序?(2)哪些环境变量(压力源)在与指示社区健康的底栖生物指标的关系方面最重要,以及压力源如何从最重要到最不重要排序?14个底栖生物指标的一致排序结果显示,耐受性(耐受性分类群百分比、耐受性值和收集者/采集者)和敏感性(EPT分类群和分类群丰富度)是最重要的。38个环境变量从最重要到最不重要的一致排名表明,生境指标、金属和粒度特征对形成底栖生物群落最重要,而拟除虫菊酯在流域地理范围内并不是一个重要的压力源。
Ranking the importance of benthic metrics and environmental stressors from over a decade of bioassessment multiple stressor studies in five California waterbodies
Abstract Comprehensive bioassessment multiple stressor field studies were conducted in five waterbodies in the Central Valley, San Francisco and Central Coast areas of California between 2006 and 2017. Samples were collected over multiple years in Pleasant Grove Creek (PGC – 8 years), Kirker Creek (KC – 2 years), Arcade Creek (ARC – 3 years), Salinas streams (SAL – 3 years) and the lower Santa Maria River watershed (SM – 3 years). In each watershed, metrics indicative of physical habitat quality and the relative health of benthic communities were collected, along with measurements of various potential toxicants in sediment (metals and pyrethroids), total organic carbon (TOC) and sediment grain size characteristics. For all waterbodies, pyrethroids have been reported at concentrations suspected to be toxic based on single-species laboratory toxicity tests. The data from all of these studies were assembled into a single data base which was analyzed by a series of univariate and multivariate statistical analyses. These analyses were designed to examine overall relationships between benthic community health and environmental quality conditions across the watersheds, as well as to address the following two key questions: (1) Which benthic metrics (response indicators) were the most important to relationships with environmental quality conditions and how do these metrics rank from most to least important? and (2) Which environmental variables (stressors) were the most important in terms of relationships to benthic metrics indicative of community health and how do the stressors rank from most to least important? Consensus ranking of 14 benthic metrics showed that stress tolerant (% Tolerant taxa, Tolerance value and Collectors/gatherers) and stress sensitive (EPT taxa and taxa richness) were the most important. The consensus ranking of 38 environmental variables from most to least important showed that habitat metrics, metals and grain size characteristics were most important for shaping benthic communities while pyrethroids were not reported to be an important stressor across the geographic scope of the watersheds.