{"title":"两种麻醉方案下冠状动脉旁路移植术早期心脏并发症分析","authors":"S. Maruniak, O. Loskutov, I. Malysh","doi":"10.31928/2305-3127-2022.3-4.3642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim – to analyze the effect of two different schemes of anesthesia on early cardiac complications in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass.Materials and methods. The study included 120 patients who underwent CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The median surgery risk according to EuroSCORE II was 3.45 % (2.15 %; 4.05 %). According to the scheme of anesthesia, all patients were divided into two groups: the first group (60 patients) – low-opioid scheme of anesthesia; the second group (60 patients) – a standard scheme of anesthesia.Results. Patients in the first group were more than twice as likely to develop postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to the second group (9 (15.0 %) vs. 19 (31.7 %), p = 0.031). In addition, patients in the first group were 2.3 times significantly less likely to have low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) compared to the second group (11.7 % vs. 26.7 %, p = 0.037). The duration of CPB (p = 0.032) and the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (p = 0.004) were reliable indicators for predicting LCOS. The final statistical model [F (4, N = 120) = 12.52, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.304] covers almost a third of all factors in the development of LCOS. Only the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (the final statistical model (F (4, N = 120) = 11.54, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.286) was a reliable indicator for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation.Conclusions. The obtained results confirm the safety of clinical use of anesthesia schemes with low doses of opioids in cardiac surgery patients and emphasize the possibility of a more conservative use of opioids in cardiac surgery.","PeriodicalId":9540,"journal":{"name":"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of early cardiac complications after coronary artery bypass grafting under two different regimens of anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"S. Maruniak, O. Loskutov, I. Malysh\",\"doi\":\"10.31928/2305-3127-2022.3-4.3642\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim – to analyze the effect of two different schemes of anesthesia on early cardiac complications in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass.Materials and methods. The study included 120 patients who underwent CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The median surgery risk according to EuroSCORE II was 3.45 % (2.15 %; 4.05 %). According to the scheme of anesthesia, all patients were divided into two groups: the first group (60 patients) – low-opioid scheme of anesthesia; the second group (60 patients) – a standard scheme of anesthesia.Results. Patients in the first group were more than twice as likely to develop postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to the second group (9 (15.0 %) vs. 19 (31.7 %), p = 0.031). In addition, patients in the first group were 2.3 times significantly less likely to have low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) compared to the second group (11.7 % vs. 26.7 %, p = 0.037). The duration of CPB (p = 0.032) and the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (p = 0.004) were reliable indicators for predicting LCOS. The final statistical model [F (4, N = 120) = 12.52, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.304] covers almost a third of all factors in the development of LCOS. Only the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (the final statistical model (F (4, N = 120) = 11.54, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.286) was a reliable indicator for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation.Conclusions. The obtained results confirm the safety of clinical use of anesthesia schemes with low doses of opioids in cardiac surgery patients and emphasize the possibility of a more conservative use of opioids in cardiac surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31928/2305-3127-2022.3-4.3642\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiac Surgery and Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31928/2305-3127-2022.3-4.3642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的分析两种不同麻醉方案对体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术患者早期心脏并发症的影响。材料和方法。该研究包括120例接受CABG合并体外循环(CPB)的患者。根据EuroSCORE II,中位手术风险为3.45% (2.15%;4.05%)。根据麻醉方案将所有患者分为两组:第一组(60例)-低阿片类药物麻醉方案;第二组(60例)采用标准麻醉方案。第一组患者术后发生心房颤动的可能性是第二组的两倍多(9例(15.0%)vs. 19例(31.7%),p = 0.031)。此外,与第二组相比,第一组患者发生低心输出量综合征(LCOS)的可能性显著降低2.3倍(11.7% vs 26.7%, p = 0.037)。CPB持续时间(p = 0.032)和CPB后白细胞介素-6水平(p = 0.004)是预测LCOS的可靠指标。最终的统计模型[F (4, N = 120) = 12.52, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.304]几乎涵盖了LCOS发生的所有因素的三分之一。只有CPB术后白细胞介素-6水平(最终统计模型(F (4, N = 120) = 11.54, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.286)是预测术后房颤的可靠指标。本研究结果证实了临床使用低剂量阿片类药物麻醉方案在心脏手术患者中的安全性,并强调了阿片类药物在心脏手术中更保守使用的可能性。
Analysis of early cardiac complications after coronary artery bypass grafting under two different regimens of anesthesia
The aim – to analyze the effect of two different schemes of anesthesia on early cardiac complications in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with cardiopulmonary bypass.Materials and methods. The study included 120 patients who underwent CABG with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The median surgery risk according to EuroSCORE II was 3.45 % (2.15 %; 4.05 %). According to the scheme of anesthesia, all patients were divided into two groups: the first group (60 patients) – low-opioid scheme of anesthesia; the second group (60 patients) – a standard scheme of anesthesia.Results. Patients in the first group were more than twice as likely to develop postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to the second group (9 (15.0 %) vs. 19 (31.7 %), p = 0.031). In addition, patients in the first group were 2.3 times significantly less likely to have low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) compared to the second group (11.7 % vs. 26.7 %, p = 0.037). The duration of CPB (p = 0.032) and the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (p = 0.004) were reliable indicators for predicting LCOS. The final statistical model [F (4, N = 120) = 12.52, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.304] covers almost a third of all factors in the development of LCOS. Only the level of interleukin-6 after CPB (the final statistical model (F (4, N = 120) = 11.54, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.286) was a reliable indicator for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation.Conclusions. The obtained results confirm the safety of clinical use of anesthesia schemes with low doses of opioids in cardiac surgery patients and emphasize the possibility of a more conservative use of opioids in cardiac surgery.