放射技师在桡骨远端骨折鉴定中的表现的FROC分析

Mark F. Mc Entee , Shane Dunnion
{"title":"放射技师在桡骨远端骨折鉴定中的表现的FROC分析","authors":"Mark F. Mc Entee ,&nbsp;Shane Dunnion","doi":"10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The aims of the study are to measure the performance of radiographers in detecting the presence of a distal </span>wrist fracture; to determine whether the number of years clinical service impacts on radiographers' performance and progresses further to compare the performance of the radiographer, untrained in reporting, to that of published data on the performance of consultant radiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>A Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) study was carried out on radiographers to assess their performance. 19 experienced radiographers untrained in image interpretation were shown 30 wrist radiographs, 15 of which had distal radial fractures, 15 did not. The results of the FROC, false positive and </span>false negative data were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study showed that for AUC values radiographers scored 0.877 (0.087) on average. A trend of increased performance with increased experience was seen amongst the radiographers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Radiographers AUC scores of 0.87 demonstrates that there is potential for radiographers to recognise fractures with some accuracy. There is a trend of increasing performance with increasing experience. When this was compared to published data it is seen that radiologists outscored radiographers and a difference in performance exists between the groups. The radiologists as a whole and the MSK specialists scored a significantly higher than the radiographers with and AUC value of 0.92 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.05) and 0.96 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.001) respectively. Radiologists had fewer false positives than radiographers (<em>P</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.007), however there was no difference was found in the false negatives (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.11). Further image interpretation training of radiographers should now be carried out and this experiment should be repeated</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100505,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiography","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 90-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.001","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A FROC analysis of radiographers performance in identification of distal radial fractures\",\"authors\":\"Mark F. Mc Entee ,&nbsp;Shane Dunnion\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>The aims of the study are to measure the performance of radiographers in detecting the presence of a distal </span>wrist fracture; to determine whether the number of years clinical service impacts on radiographers' performance and progresses further to compare the performance of the radiographer, untrained in reporting, to that of published data on the performance of consultant radiologists.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>A Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) study was carried out on radiographers to assess their performance. 19 experienced radiographers untrained in image interpretation were shown 30 wrist radiographs, 15 of which had distal radial fractures, 15 did not. The results of the FROC, false positive and </span>false negative data were assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study showed that for AUC values radiographers scored 0.877 (0.087) on average. A trend of increased performance with increased experience was seen amongst the radiographers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Radiographers AUC scores of 0.87 demonstrates that there is potential for radiographers to recognise fractures with some accuracy. There is a trend of increasing performance with increasing experience. When this was compared to published data it is seen that radiologists outscored radiographers and a difference in performance exists between the groups. The radiologists as a whole and the MSK specialists scored a significantly higher than the radiographers with and AUC value of 0.92 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.05) and 0.96 (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.001) respectively. Radiologists had fewer false positives than radiographers (<em>P</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.007), however there was no difference was found in the false negatives (<em>p</em> <!-->≤<!--> <!-->0.11). Further image interpretation training of radiographers should now be carried out and this experiment should be repeated</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiography\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 90-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ejradi.2009.09.001\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117509000184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756117509000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

该研究的目的是测量放射技师在检测手腕远端骨折存在方面的表现;厘定临床服务年数是否会影响放射技师的表现,并进一步比较未接受汇报训练的放射技师的表现与已公布的放射专科医生表现数据。方法对放射技师进行自由反应受者工作特性(FROC)研究,评价其工作表现。19名经验丰富的放射技师未接受过图像解读培训,向他们展示了30张腕关节x线片,其中15人有桡骨远端骨折,15人没有。评估FROC结果、假阳性和假阴性数据。结果放射技师AUC值平均得分为0.877分(0.087分)。随着经验的增加,放射技师的表现也有提高的趋势。结论放射技师的AUC评分为0.87,表明放射技师有可能以一定的准确性识别骨折。随着经验的增加,业绩有提高的趋势。当与已发表的数据进行比较时,可以看到放射科医生的得分高于放射科医生,并且两组之间的表现存在差异。放射科医师整体得分和MSK专科得分均显著高于放射科医师,AUC值分别为0.92 (p≤0.05)和0.96 (p≤0.001)。放射科医师的假阳性比放射技师少(P≤0.007),但假阴性没有差异(P≤0.11)。现在应该对放射技师进行进一步的图像判读培训,并且应该重复这个实验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A FROC analysis of radiographers performance in identification of distal radial fractures

The aims of the study are to measure the performance of radiographers in detecting the presence of a distal wrist fracture; to determine whether the number of years clinical service impacts on radiographers' performance and progresses further to compare the performance of the radiographer, untrained in reporting, to that of published data on the performance of consultant radiologists.

Method

A Free-response Receiver Operating Characteristic (FROC) study was carried out on radiographers to assess their performance. 19 experienced radiographers untrained in image interpretation were shown 30 wrist radiographs, 15 of which had distal radial fractures, 15 did not. The results of the FROC, false positive and false negative data were assessed.

Results

The study showed that for AUC values radiographers scored 0.877 (0.087) on average. A trend of increased performance with increased experience was seen amongst the radiographers.

Conclusions

Radiographers AUC scores of 0.87 demonstrates that there is potential for radiographers to recognise fractures with some accuracy. There is a trend of increasing performance with increasing experience. When this was compared to published data it is seen that radiologists outscored radiographers and a difference in performance exists between the groups. The radiologists as a whole and the MSK specialists scored a significantly higher than the radiographers with and AUC value of 0.92 (p  0.05) and 0.96 (p  0.001) respectively. Radiologists had fewer false positives than radiographers (P  0.007), however there was no difference was found in the false negatives (p  0.11). Further image interpretation training of radiographers should now be carried out and this experiment should be repeated

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信