Big4对COVID-19危机的反应:对鲍曼道德冲动的审视

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
M. Safari, Eva E. Tsahuridu, Alan Lowe
{"title":"Big4对COVID-19危机的反应:对鲍曼道德冲动的审视","authors":"M. Safari, Eva E. Tsahuridu, Alan Lowe","doi":"10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper offers insights on the response of a Big4 firm to the COVID-19 crisis vis-à-vis moral considerations. More specifically, the authors draw on Bauman's (1990) “moral impulse” to explore how the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction of people to traits tend to weaken moral considerations and negatively influences decisions and actions.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt a qualitative approach that involves an interpretive textual analysis of the COVID-19 responses of a Big 4 accounting firm. Their study uses two vignettes in which they problematise aspects of the actions and ethico-social contribution of a Big4 firm in the heat of a global pandemic.FindingsThe findings reveal examples of effacement of the human face (depersonalization/dehumanization) and reduction of persons to traits, as well as excessive distancing between the “doing” actors and those individuals who bear the consequences of those actions. Revealing an opportunity lost, the authors’ vignettes indicate that the reduction to traits tactics led to dissembling and dehumanizing employees into resources that perform tasks that are “value-add” for the organisation, consonant with neoliberal ideologies.Research limitations/implicationsThe common limitations of qualitative approach apply to the current study for generalisability. The authors also rely heavily on publicly available information given the time frame they were faced with and their chosen research approach.Social implicationsDrawing on accounting delineation debates, the paper calls for societal dialogues for reshaping the “official” accounting of events.Originality/valueThe authors elaborate moral impulse through the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction to traits, during a crisis. Their study mobilises a moral evaluation through which they uncover documented responses by a Big4 firm during the COVID-19 crisis. The study shows how the norms of human action have been systematically cut off from the original moral habitat and subordinated, and evaluated according, to business standards.","PeriodicalId":48311,"journal":{"name":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Big4 responses to the COVID-19 crisis: an examination of Bauman's moral impulse\",\"authors\":\"M. Safari, Eva E. Tsahuridu, Alan Lowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe paper offers insights on the response of a Big4 firm to the COVID-19 crisis vis-à-vis moral considerations. More specifically, the authors draw on Bauman's (1990) “moral impulse” to explore how the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction of people to traits tend to weaken moral considerations and negatively influences decisions and actions.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt a qualitative approach that involves an interpretive textual analysis of the COVID-19 responses of a Big 4 accounting firm. Their study uses two vignettes in which they problematise aspects of the actions and ethico-social contribution of a Big4 firm in the heat of a global pandemic.FindingsThe findings reveal examples of effacement of the human face (depersonalization/dehumanization) and reduction of persons to traits, as well as excessive distancing between the “doing” actors and those individuals who bear the consequences of those actions. Revealing an opportunity lost, the authors’ vignettes indicate that the reduction to traits tactics led to dissembling and dehumanizing employees into resources that perform tasks that are “value-add” for the organisation, consonant with neoliberal ideologies.Research limitations/implicationsThe common limitations of qualitative approach apply to the current study for generalisability. The authors also rely heavily on publicly available information given the time frame they were faced with and their chosen research approach.Social implicationsDrawing on accounting delineation debates, the paper calls for societal dialogues for reshaping the “official” accounting of events.Originality/valueThe authors elaborate moral impulse through the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction to traits, during a crisis. Their study mobilises a moral evaluation through which they uncover documented responses by a Big4 firm during the COVID-19 crisis. The study shows how the norms of human action have been systematically cut off from the original moral habitat and subordinated, and evaluated according, to business standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4818\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2020-4818","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:从-à-vis道德考量的角度分析四大会计师事务所应对COVID-19危机的对策。更具体地说,作者借鉴了鲍曼(1990)的“道德冲动”,探讨了疏远、面孔淡化和将人简化为特征等相互关联的策略如何削弱道德考虑,并对决策和行动产生负面影响。设计/方法/方法作者采用定性方法,对四大会计师事务所的COVID-19应对措施进行解释性文本分析。他们的研究使用了两个小插曲,在这些小插曲中,他们对四大律所在全球流行病最严重时的行为和伦理社会贡献提出了问题。研究结果揭示了人脸的消失(去人格化/去人性化)和人的特征的减少,以及“做”的演员和承担这些行为后果的个人之间的过度距离。揭示了一个失去的机会,作者的小插图表明,对特征策略的减少导致了员工的伪装和非人性化,使其成为执行组织“增值”任务的资源,与新自由主义意识形态一致。研究的局限性/意义定性方法的共同局限性适用于目前的研究的普遍性。考虑到他们面临的时间框架和他们选择的研究方法,作者还严重依赖于公开可用的信息。社会影响借鉴会计描述辩论,本文呼吁社会对话重塑“官方”会计事件。原创性/价值在危机中,作者通过相互关联的疏远、抹去面孔和还原特征的策略来阐述道德冲动。他们的研究动员了一种道德评估,通过这种评估,他们发现了一家四大律所在COVID-19危机期间的书面反应。研究表明,人类行为的规范是如何被系统地从最初的道德栖息地切断,并根据商业标准进行从属和评估的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Big4 responses to the COVID-19 crisis: an examination of Bauman's moral impulse
PurposeThe paper offers insights on the response of a Big4 firm to the COVID-19 crisis vis-à-vis moral considerations. More specifically, the authors draw on Bauman's (1990) “moral impulse” to explore how the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction of people to traits tend to weaken moral considerations and negatively influences decisions and actions.Design/methodology/approachThe authors adopt a qualitative approach that involves an interpretive textual analysis of the COVID-19 responses of a Big 4 accounting firm. Their study uses two vignettes in which they problematise aspects of the actions and ethico-social contribution of a Big4 firm in the heat of a global pandemic.FindingsThe findings reveal examples of effacement of the human face (depersonalization/dehumanization) and reduction of persons to traits, as well as excessive distancing between the “doing” actors and those individuals who bear the consequences of those actions. Revealing an opportunity lost, the authors’ vignettes indicate that the reduction to traits tactics led to dissembling and dehumanizing employees into resources that perform tasks that are “value-add” for the organisation, consonant with neoliberal ideologies.Research limitations/implicationsThe common limitations of qualitative approach apply to the current study for generalisability. The authors also rely heavily on publicly available information given the time frame they were faced with and their chosen research approach.Social implicationsDrawing on accounting delineation debates, the paper calls for societal dialogues for reshaping the “official” accounting of events.Originality/valueThe authors elaborate moral impulse through the interrelated tactics of distancing, effacement of the face and reduction to traits, during a crisis. Their study mobilises a moral evaluation through which they uncover documented responses by a Big4 firm during the COVID-19 crisis. The study shows how the norms of human action have been systematically cut off from the original moral habitat and subordinated, and evaluated according, to business standards.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
14.30%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Dedicated to the advancement of accounting knowledge, the Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal publishes high quality manuscripts concerning the interaction between accounting/auditing and their socio-economic and political environments, encouraging critical analysis of policy and practice in these areas. The journal also seeks to encourage debate about the philosophies and traditions which underpin the accounting profession, the implications of new policy alternatives and the impact of accountancy on the socio-economic and political environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信