监狱绑定?

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
J. Zuijderduijn
{"title":"监狱绑定?","authors":"J. Zuijderduijn","doi":"10.25162/VSWG-2019-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article provides empirical evidence on the use of two types of security in medieval finance: conditional hostageship and the community responsibility system. Both exposed guarantors to imprisonment or confiscation. Evidence from Dordrecht shows the former was frequently applied but was not very disruptive. However, the latter community responsibility system did lead to reprisals against merchants. It was used to provide the ruler with loan guarantees: Dordrecht's travelling citizens acted as collateral, and thus played a crucial role in enabling the ruler to create sovereign debt. The city's willingness to provide this financial service for many centuries, while exposing its merchants to reprisals in the process, must be seen in the context of Charles Tilly's model of an ongoing exchange where cities provided financial services and rulers compensated them with political and economic privileges.","PeriodicalId":41261,"journal":{"name":"VSWG-Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prison Bound?\",\"authors\":\"J. Zuijderduijn\",\"doi\":\"10.25162/VSWG-2019-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article provides empirical evidence on the use of two types of security in medieval finance: conditional hostageship and the community responsibility system. Both exposed guarantors to imprisonment or confiscation. Evidence from Dordrecht shows the former was frequently applied but was not very disruptive. However, the latter community responsibility system did lead to reprisals against merchants. It was used to provide the ruler with loan guarantees: Dordrecht's travelling citizens acted as collateral, and thus played a crucial role in enabling the ruler to create sovereign debt. The city's willingness to provide this financial service for many centuries, while exposing its merchants to reprisals in the process, must be seen in the context of Charles Tilly's model of an ongoing exchange where cities provided financial services and rulers compensated them with political and economic privileges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VSWG-Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VSWG-Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25162/VSWG-2019-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VSWG-Vierteljahrschrift fur Sozial-und Wirtschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/VSWG-2019-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对中世纪金融中有条件人质制和社会责任制两种担保形式的运用进行了实证研究。两者都使担保人面临监禁或没收的危险。来自多德雷赫特的证据表明,前者经常被使用,但不是很有破坏性。然而,后者的社区责任制确实导致了对商人的报复。它被用来为统治者提供贷款担保:多德雷赫特的旅行公民充当抵押品,因此在使统治者能够创造主权债务方面发挥了关键作用。几个世纪以来,城市愿意提供这种金融服务,同时在此过程中使其商人遭受报复,必须在查尔斯·蒂利(Charles Tilly)的持续交换模式的背景下看到,城市提供金融服务,统治者用政治和经济特权补偿他们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prison Bound?
The article provides empirical evidence on the use of two types of security in medieval finance: conditional hostageship and the community responsibility system. Both exposed guarantors to imprisonment or confiscation. Evidence from Dordrecht shows the former was frequently applied but was not very disruptive. However, the latter community responsibility system did lead to reprisals against merchants. It was used to provide the ruler with loan guarantees: Dordrecht's travelling citizens acted as collateral, and thus played a crucial role in enabling the ruler to create sovereign debt. The city's willingness to provide this financial service for many centuries, while exposing its merchants to reprisals in the process, must be seen in the context of Charles Tilly's model of an ongoing exchange where cities provided financial services and rulers compensated them with political and economic privileges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Manuskripte von Aufsätzen, Miszellen und Rezensionen werden an Prof. Dr. Günther Schulz erbeten. Erwünscht sind für alle Manuskripte Blätter mit einseitiger Beschriftung. Aufsätze sollen den Umfang von 32 Seiten / 1 1/2zeilig nicht überschreiten. Die VSWG druckt nur Originalmanuskripte ab, keine Übersetzungen. Die Beiträge geben nicht in jedem Fall die Meinung des verantwortlichen Herausgebers wieder. Der Redaktion angebotene Beiträge dürfen nicht bereits veröffentlicht sein oder gleichzeitig an anderer Stelle veröffentlicht werden; Wiederabdrucke erfordern die Zustimmung des Verlages. Der Verlag liefert den Verfassern 25 Sonderdrucke der Aufsätze unentgeltlich.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信