探索全民基本收入的健康案例:来自与不稳定群体合作的全科医生的证据

IF 1 Q3 ECONOMICS

Basic Income Studies Pub Date : 2019-11-05 DOI:10.1515/bis-2019-0008

M. Johnson, Dan Degerman, R. Geyer

{"title":"探索全民基本收入的健康案例:来自与不稳定群体合作的全科医生的证据","authors":"M. Johnson, Dan Degerman, R. Geyer","doi":"10.1515/bis-2019-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article draws upon clinical experience of GPs working in a deprived area of the North East of England to examine the potential contribution of Universal Basic Income to health by mitigating ‘patient-side barriers’ among three cohorts experiencing distinct forms of ‘precariousness’: 1) long-term unemployed welfare recipients with low levels of education (lumpenprecariat); 2) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with low levels of education (‘lower’ precariat); 3) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with relatively high levels of education (‘upper’ precariat). We argue that any benefits must be accompanied by robust institutions capable of promoting health.","PeriodicalId":43898,"journal":{"name":"Basic Income Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Health Case for Universal Basic Income: Evidence from GPs Working with Precarious Groups\",\"authors\":\"M. Johnson, Dan Degerman, R. Geyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bis-2019-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article draws upon clinical experience of GPs working in a deprived area of the North East of England to examine the potential contribution of Universal Basic Income to health by mitigating ‘patient-side barriers’ among three cohorts experiencing distinct forms of ‘precariousness’: 1) long-term unemployed welfare recipients with low levels of education (lumpenprecariat); 2) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with low levels of education (‘lower’ precariat); 3) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with relatively high levels of education (‘upper’ precariat). We argue that any benefits must be accompanied by robust institutions capable of promoting health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic Income Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2019-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Income Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bis-2019-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

本文借鉴了在英格兰东北部贫困地区工作的全科医生的临床经验，通过在三个经历不同形式的“不稳定”的队列中减轻“患者方面的障碍”来检查全民基本收入对健康的潜在贡献:1)长期失业的低教育水平的福利接受者(lumpenprecariat);2)受教育程度低的短期/零时工合同工人(“较低”的不稳定工人);3)受教育程度相对较高的短期/零时工合同工人(“上层”不稳定工人)。我们认为，任何好处都必须伴随着能够促进健康的健全机构。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Exploring the Health Case for Universal Basic Income: Evidence from GPs Working with Precarious Groups

Abstract This article draws upon clinical experience of GPs working in a deprived area of the North East of England to examine the potential contribution of Universal Basic Income to health by mitigating ‘patient-side barriers’ among three cohorts experiencing distinct forms of ‘precariousness’: 1) long-term unemployed welfare recipients with low levels of education (lumpenprecariat); 2) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with low levels of education (‘lower’ precariat); 3) workers on short-term/zero-hours contracts with relatively high levels of education (‘upper’ precariat). We argue that any benefits must be accompanied by robust institutions capable of promoting health.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Basic Income Studies ECONOMICS-

CiteScore

2.40

自引率

18.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： Basic income is a universal income grant available to every citizen without means test or work requirement. Academic discussion of basic income and related policies has been growing in the fields of economics, philosophy, political science, sociology, and public policy over the last few decades — with dozens of journal articles published each year, and basic income constituting the subject of more than 30 books in the last 10 years. In addition, the political discussion of basic income has been expanding through social organizations, NGOs and other advocacy groups. Internationally, recent years have witnessed the endorsement of basic income by grassroots movements as well as government officials in developing countries such as Brazil or South-Africa. As the community of people working on this issue has been expanding all over the world, incorporating grassroots activists, high profile academics — including several Nobel Prize winners in economics — and policymakers, the amount of high quality research on this topic has increased considerably. In the light of such extensive scholarship on this topic, the need to coordinate research efforts through a journal specifically devoted to basic income and cognate policies became pressing. Basic Income Studies (BIS) is the first academic journal to focus specifically on basic income and cognate policies.