公共选择,模糊性和监管

Richard J. Butler, M.G. Carney
{"title":"公共选择,模糊性和监管","authors":"Richard J. Butler,&nbsp;M.G. Carney","doi":"10.1016/0281-7527(87)90007-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>When governments make choices on behalf of their citizens fewer private choices can be made. If there were no ambiguity it would be possible for government to plan effectively but as soon as task knowledge changes, uncertainty and ambiguity results, and government must resort to other forms of regulation. Four ideal types of regulation are considered. A contingency model is developed with task ambiguity and industry concentration as the contingency variables. De-regulation and privatization may be seen as an attempt by government to increase private choice. Examination of the British telecommunications and bus transport industries suggests that this comes about to some extent. But two hybrid forms of regulation are also considered in relation to these two cases which permit a greater private choice than pure planning but which also allows government to maintain a degree of overall control.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101144,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(87)90007-7","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public choice, ambiguity and regulation\",\"authors\":\"Richard J. Butler,&nbsp;M.G. Carney\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0281-7527(87)90007-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>When governments make choices on behalf of their citizens fewer private choices can be made. If there were no ambiguity it would be possible for government to plan effectively but as soon as task knowledge changes, uncertainty and ambiguity results, and government must resort to other forms of regulation. Four ideal types of regulation are considered. A contingency model is developed with task ambiguity and industry concentration as the contingency variables. De-regulation and privatization may be seen as an attempt by government to increase private choice. Examination of the British telecommunications and bus transport industries suggests that this comes about to some extent. But two hybrid forms of regulation are also considered in relation to these two cases which permit a greater private choice than pure planning but which also allows government to maintain a degree of overall control.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0281-7527(87)90007-7\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752787900077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0281752787900077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

当政府代表公民做出选择时,私人的选择就会减少。如果不存在歧义,政府就有可能进行有效的计划,但一旦任务知识发生变化,就会产生不确定性和歧义,政府必须诉诸其他形式的监管。本文考虑了四种理想的监管类型。建立了以任务模糊度和行业集中度为权变变量的权变模型。放松管制和私有化可以看作是政府增加私人选择的一种尝试。对英国电信和公共汽车运输业的调查表明,这种情况在某种程度上确实存在。但在这两种情况下,也考虑了两种混合形式的监管,它们允许比纯计划更大的私人选择,但也允许政府保持一定程度的总体控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public choice, ambiguity and regulation

When governments make choices on behalf of their citizens fewer private choices can be made. If there were no ambiguity it would be possible for government to plan effectively but as soon as task knowledge changes, uncertainty and ambiguity results, and government must resort to other forms of regulation. Four ideal types of regulation are considered. A contingency model is developed with task ambiguity and industry concentration as the contingency variables. De-regulation and privatization may be seen as an attempt by government to increase private choice. Examination of the British telecommunications and bus transport industries suggests that this comes about to some extent. But two hybrid forms of regulation are also considered in relation to these two cases which permit a greater private choice than pure planning but which also allows government to maintain a degree of overall control.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信