R. Lloyd, M. Mooncey, L. Parker, K. Robinson, F. Baldeweg, Alex S. Jolly
{"title":"PG116“初步研究”-由飞行员提供人为因素反馈的多部门现场模拟","authors":"R. Lloyd, M. Mooncey, L. Parker, K. Robinson, F. Baldeweg, Alex S. Jolly","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Approximately 70% of adverse events in healthcare are thought to be attributable to a failure of non-technical performance, including communication, teamwork and leadership.1 The integration of regular in situ simulation promotes positive team-working relationships. The aviation industry is widely considered to be the gold standard for safety culture. ‘On average, just one commercial flight goes down for every 8.3million take-offs worldwide. In the US alone, there are approximately 400,0000 avoidable medical errors every year, which is the equivalent of two jumbo jet crashes every day’.2 Enhanced inter-specialty relationships and improved human factors training are both imperative for promoting patient safety. Methods/Project Description Twenty in situ simulations were facilitated across the hospital. Sims often involved multiple specialties, fostering a collaborative training spirit. Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, Acute Medicine and Anaesthetics scenarios were facilitated by departmental simulation leads, with logistics support from the Resuscitation Officers. The technical debrief was led by the clinical facilitator, and the human factors debrief was facilitated by airline pilots in attendance. A write-up with key learning points was then distributed to the departments involved within one week. Summary of Results/Outcomes The write-ups comprised of technical feedback from the medical team and human factors feedback from the pilots. Human factors feedback centred around four key areas: Communication Situational Awareness Workload Management Decision-making A questionnaire survey was used to assess the effects of human factors feedback on both confidence and competence. 94% of participants reported that their understanding of human factors principles improved following simulation. Qualitative evaluation of results was undertaken; comments included: ‘Authentic learning experience which highlighted areas of weakness and also given me confidence to ‘step up’ in a supervised setting’. The feedback was circulated amongst the wider team and shared on the PonderMed blog.3 Discussion, Conclusions, Recommendations Parallels were drawn between healthcare and the aviation industry, to highlight key learning points. There were four key concepts repeatedly emphasised (see table 1 below): Table 1. References Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety – the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;153:23–46. ‘Black Box thinking, 2015. Syed M. PonderMed.co","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PG116 ‘A pilot study’ – multi-departmental in situ simulation with human factors feedback delivered by pilots\",\"authors\":\"R. Lloyd, M. Mooncey, L. Parker, K. Robinson, F. Baldeweg, Alex S. Jolly\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Approximately 70% of adverse events in healthcare are thought to be attributable to a failure of non-technical performance, including communication, teamwork and leadership.1 The integration of regular in situ simulation promotes positive team-working relationships. The aviation industry is widely considered to be the gold standard for safety culture. ‘On average, just one commercial flight goes down for every 8.3million take-offs worldwide. In the US alone, there are approximately 400,0000 avoidable medical errors every year, which is the equivalent of two jumbo jet crashes every day’.2 Enhanced inter-specialty relationships and improved human factors training are both imperative for promoting patient safety. Methods/Project Description Twenty in situ simulations were facilitated across the hospital. Sims often involved multiple specialties, fostering a collaborative training spirit. Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, Acute Medicine and Anaesthetics scenarios were facilitated by departmental simulation leads, with logistics support from the Resuscitation Officers. The technical debrief was led by the clinical facilitator, and the human factors debrief was facilitated by airline pilots in attendance. A write-up with key learning points was then distributed to the departments involved within one week. Summary of Results/Outcomes The write-ups comprised of technical feedback from the medical team and human factors feedback from the pilots. Human factors feedback centred around four key areas: Communication Situational Awareness Workload Management Decision-making A questionnaire survey was used to assess the effects of human factors feedback on both confidence and competence. 94% of participants reported that their understanding of human factors principles improved following simulation. Qualitative evaluation of results was undertaken; comments included: ‘Authentic learning experience which highlighted areas of weakness and also given me confidence to ‘step up’ in a supervised setting’. The feedback was circulated amongst the wider team and shared on the PonderMed blog.3 Discussion, Conclusions, Recommendations Parallels were drawn between healthcare and the aviation industry, to highlight key learning points. There were four key concepts repeatedly emphasised (see table 1 below): Table 1. References Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety – the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;153:23–46. ‘Black Box thinking, 2015. Syed M. PonderMed.co\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
医疗保健中大约70%的不良事件被认为是由于非技术表现的失败,包括沟通、团队合作和领导定期现场模拟的整合促进了积极的团队工作关系。航空业被广泛认为是安全文化的黄金标准。“全球平均每830万次起飞中,只有一次商业航班坠毁。仅在美国,每年就有大约40万起可避免的医疗事故,相当于每天两架大型喷气式飞机坠毁加强专业间关系和改进人为因素培训对于促进患者安全都是必不可少的。方法/项目描述在整个医院进行了20次现场模拟。Sims通常涉及多个专业,培养协作培训精神。急救医学、儿科、急症医学和麻醉学的情景由部门模拟主管协助,并由复苏主任提供后勤支援。技术汇报由临床协调员主持,人为因素汇报由在场的航空公司飞行员主持。然后在一周内将一份包含重点学习要点的总结分发给相关部门。结果/结果摘要报告包括医疗团队的技术反馈和飞行员的人为因素反馈。人为因素反馈集中在四个关键领域:沟通、态势感知、工作量管理、决策。一项问卷调查用于评估人为因素反馈对信心和能力的影响。94%的参与者报告说,在模拟之后,他们对人为因素原理的理解有所提高。对结果进行了定性评价;评论包括:“真实的学习经历,突出了我的弱点,也让我有信心在有监督的环境中‘进步’。”这些反馈在更广泛的团队中传播,并在PonderMed博客上分享讨论、结论和建议在医疗保健和航空业之间进行了比较,以突出重点学习点。有四个关键概念被反复强调(见下面的表1):参考文献Carayon P, Wood KE。病人安全-人为因素和系统工程的作用。种马卫生技术通报2010;153:23-46。黑匣子思维,2015年。Syed M. pondermed.com
PG116 ‘A pilot study’ – multi-departmental in situ simulation with human factors feedback delivered by pilots
Introduction Approximately 70% of adverse events in healthcare are thought to be attributable to a failure of non-technical performance, including communication, teamwork and leadership.1 The integration of regular in situ simulation promotes positive team-working relationships. The aviation industry is widely considered to be the gold standard for safety culture. ‘On average, just one commercial flight goes down for every 8.3million take-offs worldwide. In the US alone, there are approximately 400,0000 avoidable medical errors every year, which is the equivalent of two jumbo jet crashes every day’.2 Enhanced inter-specialty relationships and improved human factors training are both imperative for promoting patient safety. Methods/Project Description Twenty in situ simulations were facilitated across the hospital. Sims often involved multiple specialties, fostering a collaborative training spirit. Emergency Medicine, Paediatrics, Acute Medicine and Anaesthetics scenarios were facilitated by departmental simulation leads, with logistics support from the Resuscitation Officers. The technical debrief was led by the clinical facilitator, and the human factors debrief was facilitated by airline pilots in attendance. A write-up with key learning points was then distributed to the departments involved within one week. Summary of Results/Outcomes The write-ups comprised of technical feedback from the medical team and human factors feedback from the pilots. Human factors feedback centred around four key areas: Communication Situational Awareness Workload Management Decision-making A questionnaire survey was used to assess the effects of human factors feedback on both confidence and competence. 94% of participants reported that their understanding of human factors principles improved following simulation. Qualitative evaluation of results was undertaken; comments included: ‘Authentic learning experience which highlighted areas of weakness and also given me confidence to ‘step up’ in a supervised setting’. The feedback was circulated amongst the wider team and shared on the PonderMed blog.3 Discussion, Conclusions, Recommendations Parallels were drawn between healthcare and the aviation industry, to highlight key learning points. There were four key concepts repeatedly emphasised (see table 1 below): Table 1. References Carayon P, Wood KE. Patient safety – the role of human factors and systems engineering. Stud Health Technol Inform 2010;153:23–46. ‘Black Box thinking, 2015. Syed M. PonderMed.co