杜威与给定

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
J. Garrison
{"title":"杜威与给定","authors":"J. Garrison","doi":"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.3.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In an earlier paper, it was shown that John Dewey rejected what Wilfrid Sellars called \"the Myth of the Given\" (Garrison, 2019). The question remains: What, if anything, does Dewey think is given? The answer is as easily stated as it is difficult to understand: What is most primordially given is the noncognitive, unanalyzed, immediate qualitative experience of existence. All the rest is taken or made. Among things taken or made are such analytical distinctions as organism/environment, subject/object, knower/known, and such. Likewise, mediating signs including data for inferences, habits, linguistic meanings, and logical essences are also taken or made from immediately given qualitative experiences.","PeriodicalId":45325,"journal":{"name":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dewey and the Given\",\"authors\":\"J. Garrison\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.3.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In an earlier paper, it was shown that John Dewey rejected what Wilfrid Sellars called \\\"the Myth of the Given\\\" (Garrison, 2019). The question remains: What, if anything, does Dewey think is given? The answer is as easily stated as it is difficult to understand: What is most primordially given is the noncognitive, unanalyzed, immediate qualitative experience of existence. All the rest is taken or made. Among things taken or made are such analytical distinctions as organism/environment, subject/object, knower/known, and such. Likewise, mediating signs including data for inferences, habits, linguistic meanings, and logical essences are also taken or made from immediately given qualitative experiences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.3.04\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TRANSACTIONS OF THE CHARLES S PEIRCE SOCIETY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.57.3.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:在早期的一篇论文中,约翰·杜威拒绝了威尔弗里德·塞拉斯所谓的“给定的神话”(加里森,2019)。问题仍然存在:杜威认为这是什么,如果有的话?答案很容易说出来,却很难理解:最原始的东西是关于存在的非认知的、未经分析的、直接的定性的经验。其余的都是被拿走或制造出来的。在获取或制造的事物中,存在着诸如有机体/环境、主体/客体、知者/已知等分析性区分。同样,包括推论数据、习惯、语言意义和逻辑本质在内的中介符号也从立即给定的定性经验中获取或形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dewey and the Given
Abstract:In an earlier paper, it was shown that John Dewey rejected what Wilfrid Sellars called "the Myth of the Given" (Garrison, 2019). The question remains: What, if anything, does Dewey think is given? The answer is as easily stated as it is difficult to understand: What is most primordially given is the noncognitive, unanalyzed, immediate qualitative experience of existence. All the rest is taken or made. Among things taken or made are such analytical distinctions as organism/environment, subject/object, knower/known, and such. Likewise, mediating signs including data for inferences, habits, linguistic meanings, and logical essences are also taken or made from immediately given qualitative experiences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society has been the premier peer-reviewed journal specializing in the history of American philosophy since its founding in 1965. Although named for the founder of American pragmatism, American philosophers of all schools and periods, from the colonial to the recent past, are extensively discussed. TCSPS regularly includes essays, and every significant book published in the field is discussed in a review essay. A subscription to the journal includes membership in the Charles S. Peirce Society, which was founded in 1946 by Frederic H. Young. The purpose of the Society is to encourage study of and communication about the work of Peirce and its ongoing influence in the many fields of intellectual endeavor to which he contributed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信