{"title":"亚洲接受化疗的实体肿瘤患者中性粒细胞减少:一项回顾性病例对照研究","authors":"N. Dattani, D. Altham, K. Coady","doi":"10.5430/JST.V6N2P25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian versus Caucasian patients with solid tumours onintravenous chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective case-control study comparing the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian and Caucasian patients receiving infusional chemotherapy at our unit was performed. 15 Asian and 15 Caucasian patients receiving chemotherapy between November 2012 and June 2014 were included in the study and they were matched, where possible, for age, gender, tumour type and chemotherapy regime. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 4 (≤ 0.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. The secondary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 2 (≤ 1.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. Results: There was no significant difference in the proportion of Asian and Caucasian patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia(33.3% vs. 20% of patients; P = .409) or neutropenic sepsis (20% vs. 6.7%; P = .283). However, there was a trend towards agreater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenia (66.7% vs. 33.3%; P = .068) which was associated with asignificantly greater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenic sepsis (40% vs. 6.7%; P = .031). Conclusion: This small-scale study suggests that Asian patients may suffer from an increased propensity towards neutropenia andneutropenic sepsis when receiving infusional chemotherapy emphasising the need for further research in this area. In particular,the role of prophylactic supportive therapy, such as G-CSF, in Asian patients needs to be determined.","PeriodicalId":17174,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Tumors","volume":"27 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neutropenia in Asian patients with solid tumours receiving chemotherapy: A retrospective case-control study\",\"authors\":\"N. Dattani, D. Altham, K. Coady\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/JST.V6N2P25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian versus Caucasian patients with solid tumours onintravenous chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective case-control study comparing the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian and Caucasian patients receiving infusional chemotherapy at our unit was performed. 15 Asian and 15 Caucasian patients receiving chemotherapy between November 2012 and June 2014 were included in the study and they were matched, where possible, for age, gender, tumour type and chemotherapy regime. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 4 (≤ 0.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. The secondary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 2 (≤ 1.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. Results: There was no significant difference in the proportion of Asian and Caucasian patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia(33.3% vs. 20% of patients; P = .409) or neutropenic sepsis (20% vs. 6.7%; P = .283). However, there was a trend towards agreater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenia (66.7% vs. 33.3%; P = .068) which was associated with asignificantly greater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenic sepsis (40% vs. 6.7%; P = .031). Conclusion: This small-scale study suggests that Asian patients may suffer from an increased propensity towards neutropenia andneutropenic sepsis when receiving infusional chemotherapy emphasising the need for further research in this area. In particular,the role of prophylactic supportive therapy, such as G-CSF, in Asian patients needs to be determined.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solid Tumors\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solid Tumors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V6N2P25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/JST.V6N2P25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的:比较亚洲人与高加索人静脉化疗实体瘤患者中性粒细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少脓毒症的发生率。方法:回顾性病例对照研究,比较在我单位接受输注化疗的亚裔和白种人患者中性粒细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少脓毒症的发生率。在2012年11月至2014年6月期间接受化疗的15名亚洲患者和15名高加索患者被纳入研究,并在可能的情况下,根据年龄、性别、肿瘤类型和化疗方案进行匹配。主要目的是比较4级(≤0.5个细胞× 10 9 /L)中性粒细胞减少症和中性粒细胞减少性败血症的发生率。次要目的是比较2级(≤1.5个细胞× 10 9 /L)中性粒细胞减少症和中性粒细胞减少性败血症的发生率。结果:亚洲和高加索患者发生4级中性粒细胞减少症的比例无显著差异(33.3% vs 20%;P = .409)或中性粒细胞减少性败血症(20% vs. 6.7%;P = .283)。然而,亚洲患者出现2级中性粒细胞减少症的比例呈上升趋势(66.7% vs. 33.3%;P = 0.068),这与亚洲患者发生2级中性粒细胞减少性脓毒症的比例显著增加相关(40% vs. 6.7%;P = .031)。结论:这项小规模的研究表明,亚洲患者在接受输注化疗时可能会增加中性粒细胞减少和中性粒细胞减少性败血症的倾向,这强调了在这一领域进一步研究的必要性。特别是,预防性支持疗法,如G-CSF,在亚洲患者中的作用需要确定。
Neutropenia in Asian patients with solid tumours receiving chemotherapy: A retrospective case-control study
Aim: To compare the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian versus Caucasian patients with solid tumours onintravenous chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective case-control study comparing the incidence of neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis in Asian and Caucasian patients receiving infusional chemotherapy at our unit was performed. 15 Asian and 15 Caucasian patients receiving chemotherapy between November 2012 and June 2014 were included in the study and they were matched, where possible, for age, gender, tumour type and chemotherapy regime. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 4 (≤ 0.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. The secondary objective was to compare the incidence of grade 2 (≤ 1.5 cells x 10 9 /L) neutropenia and neutropenic sepsis. Results: There was no significant difference in the proportion of Asian and Caucasian patients who developed grade 4 neutropenia(33.3% vs. 20% of patients; P = .409) or neutropenic sepsis (20% vs. 6.7%; P = .283). However, there was a trend towards agreater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenia (66.7% vs. 33.3%; P = .068) which was associated with asignificantly greater proportion of Asian patients developing grade 2 neutropenic sepsis (40% vs. 6.7%; P = .031). Conclusion: This small-scale study suggests that Asian patients may suffer from an increased propensity towards neutropenia andneutropenic sepsis when receiving infusional chemotherapy emphasising the need for further research in this area. In particular,the role of prophylactic supportive therapy, such as G-CSF, in Asian patients needs to be determined.