位置,位置,位置-在正确的时间将treg定位到正确的位置

Miao‐Tzu Huang, Yi‐Lien Chen, B. Chiang
{"title":"位置,位置,位置-在正确的时间将treg定位到正确的位置","authors":"Miao‐Tzu Huang, Yi‐Lien Chen, B. Chiang","doi":"10.14800/ICS.1267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a fruitless pursuit for suppressor cells spanning 1970s to mid-80s, the identification of CD4 + CD25 + T cells as a specific T-cell lineage with immune regulatory function in the 1990s has revived the theory of active immune tolerance and uncovered a brand-new avenue for immunologic research. Tregs have been shown to play a crucial role both in health and diseases. Whilst tremendous advance has been made in our understanding of the expanding varieties of effector mechanisms exploited by Tregs, the migration phenotypes as well as the anatomic sites where Tregs exert immune regulation are scarcely investigated. Migration of Tregs to either the lymph nodes or peripheral tissues has been shown to be exclusively indispensable in Treg-mediated immune regulation in various experimental models with specific gene-targeted mice. The once seemingly paradoxical findings were partly reconciled by later discovery of various Treg subsets with distinct migration/homing property as well as the inflammatory stage when Tregs came into play along an immune reaction. In our recent study, we investigated the migration characteristics of Treg cells by using the endothelial cell-based shear-stress flow assay that resembles the intravascular blood flow system. We found that both FoxP3-expressing Tregs and anergic T cells generated by blockage of costimulation factors, CD80 and CD86, exhibited a significantly decreased adhesion to endothelial cells as compared to antigen-activated effector T cells (66~88 % reduction). The less migration phenotype hinted inefficient tissue trafficking of the Tregs and suggested the lymph nodes as the anatomic site where Tregs optimally exert immune regulation. To this speculation, an essential role of lymph node positioning of Tregs in exerting immune suppression was demonstrated by the inability of adoptively transferred Tregs to prevent footpad inflammation after CCR7 or CD62L blockage that hindered lymph node entry of these Tregs. Therapeutic modality tageting leukocyte migration has been a mainstay alternative for immunologic diseses. Important messages for treatments of this kind and Treg-base cell therapy are that whilst inflammatory response can be harnessed by modulating the migration property of individual T-cell subsets, the relationship between Treg migration phenotypes and immune regulatory function should always be taken into account.","PeriodicalId":13679,"journal":{"name":"Inflammation and cell signaling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Location, Location, Location – Positioning Tregs to the right place at the right time\",\"authors\":\"Miao‐Tzu Huang, Yi‐Lien Chen, B. Chiang\",\"doi\":\"10.14800/ICS.1267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After a fruitless pursuit for suppressor cells spanning 1970s to mid-80s, the identification of CD4 + CD25 + T cells as a specific T-cell lineage with immune regulatory function in the 1990s has revived the theory of active immune tolerance and uncovered a brand-new avenue for immunologic research. Tregs have been shown to play a crucial role both in health and diseases. Whilst tremendous advance has been made in our understanding of the expanding varieties of effector mechanisms exploited by Tregs, the migration phenotypes as well as the anatomic sites where Tregs exert immune regulation are scarcely investigated. Migration of Tregs to either the lymph nodes or peripheral tissues has been shown to be exclusively indispensable in Treg-mediated immune regulation in various experimental models with specific gene-targeted mice. The once seemingly paradoxical findings were partly reconciled by later discovery of various Treg subsets with distinct migration/homing property as well as the inflammatory stage when Tregs came into play along an immune reaction. In our recent study, we investigated the migration characteristics of Treg cells by using the endothelial cell-based shear-stress flow assay that resembles the intravascular blood flow system. We found that both FoxP3-expressing Tregs and anergic T cells generated by blockage of costimulation factors, CD80 and CD86, exhibited a significantly decreased adhesion to endothelial cells as compared to antigen-activated effector T cells (66~88 % reduction). The less migration phenotype hinted inefficient tissue trafficking of the Tregs and suggested the lymph nodes as the anatomic site where Tregs optimally exert immune regulation. To this speculation, an essential role of lymph node positioning of Tregs in exerting immune suppression was demonstrated by the inability of adoptively transferred Tregs to prevent footpad inflammation after CCR7 or CD62L blockage that hindered lymph node entry of these Tregs. Therapeutic modality tageting leukocyte migration has been a mainstay alternative for immunologic diseses. Important messages for treatments of this kind and Treg-base cell therapy are that whilst inflammatory response can be harnessed by modulating the migration property of individual T-cell subsets, the relationship between Treg migration phenotypes and immune regulatory function should always be taken into account.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammation and cell signaling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammation and cell signaling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14800/ICS.1267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammation and cell signaling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14800/ICS.1267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

经过20世纪70年代至80年代中期对抑制细胞的无果而终的追求,20世纪90年代,CD4 + CD25 + T细胞作为一种具有免疫调节功能的特异性T细胞谱系的发现,使主动免疫耐受理论重新焕发生机,为免疫学研究开辟了一条全新的途径。Tregs已被证明在健康和疾病中都起着至关重要的作用。虽然我们对treg利用的效应机制的理解取得了巨大的进步,但对treg的迁移表型以及treg发挥免疫调节作用的解剖部位的研究却很少。在各种特定基因靶向小鼠的实验模型中,treg向淋巴结或外周组织的迁移已被证明是treg介导的免疫调节中完全不可或缺的。这个曾经看似矛盾的发现在一定程度上被后来发现的各种Treg亚群所调和,这些亚群具有不同的迁移/归巢特性,以及当Treg在免疫反应中起作用时的炎症阶段。在我们最近的研究中,我们通过使用内皮细胞为基础的剪切应力流动试验研究了Treg细胞的迁移特性,该试验类似于血管内血流系统。我们发现,与抗原激活效应T细胞相比,表达foxp3的Tregs细胞和通过阻断共刺激因子CD80和CD86产生的无能T细胞对内皮细胞的粘附明显降低(降低66~ 88%)。较少的迁移表型提示treg的组织运输效率低下,提示淋巴结是treg发挥免疫调节作用的最佳解剖部位。根据这一推测,在CCR7或CD62L阻塞阻碍treg进入淋巴结后,过继转移的treg无法预防足垫炎症,这证明了treg的淋巴结定位在发挥免疫抑制作用中的重要作用。靶向白细胞迁移的治疗方式已成为免疫性疾病的主要替代方法。这类治疗和Treg-base细胞治疗的重要信息是,虽然炎症反应可以通过调节单个t细胞亚群的迁移特性来控制,但Treg迁移表型和免疫调节功能之间的关系应该始终被考虑在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Location, Location, Location – Positioning Tregs to the right place at the right time
After a fruitless pursuit for suppressor cells spanning 1970s to mid-80s, the identification of CD4 + CD25 + T cells as a specific T-cell lineage with immune regulatory function in the 1990s has revived the theory of active immune tolerance and uncovered a brand-new avenue for immunologic research. Tregs have been shown to play a crucial role both in health and diseases. Whilst tremendous advance has been made in our understanding of the expanding varieties of effector mechanisms exploited by Tregs, the migration phenotypes as well as the anatomic sites where Tregs exert immune regulation are scarcely investigated. Migration of Tregs to either the lymph nodes or peripheral tissues has been shown to be exclusively indispensable in Treg-mediated immune regulation in various experimental models with specific gene-targeted mice. The once seemingly paradoxical findings were partly reconciled by later discovery of various Treg subsets with distinct migration/homing property as well as the inflammatory stage when Tregs came into play along an immune reaction. In our recent study, we investigated the migration characteristics of Treg cells by using the endothelial cell-based shear-stress flow assay that resembles the intravascular blood flow system. We found that both FoxP3-expressing Tregs and anergic T cells generated by blockage of costimulation factors, CD80 and CD86, exhibited a significantly decreased adhesion to endothelial cells as compared to antigen-activated effector T cells (66~88 % reduction). The less migration phenotype hinted inefficient tissue trafficking of the Tregs and suggested the lymph nodes as the anatomic site where Tregs optimally exert immune regulation. To this speculation, an essential role of lymph node positioning of Tregs in exerting immune suppression was demonstrated by the inability of adoptively transferred Tregs to prevent footpad inflammation after CCR7 or CD62L blockage that hindered lymph node entry of these Tregs. Therapeutic modality tageting leukocyte migration has been a mainstay alternative for immunologic diseses. Important messages for treatments of this kind and Treg-base cell therapy are that whilst inflammatory response can be harnessed by modulating the migration property of individual T-cell subsets, the relationship between Treg migration phenotypes and immune regulatory function should always be taken into account.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信