{"title":"电车问题中的利他自杀","authors":"D. Lester","doi":"10.2466/12.07.CP.3.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sixty-four students enrolled in psychology courses were given the “trolley dilemma” in which either the person on the bridge pushed a stranger (who was killed) into the path of a train, diverting it and thereby saving the lives of five workmen on the train tracks, or the person himself or herself jumped off the bridge (and was killed) in order to divert the train. The suicide received significantly higher scores for heroism than the murderer, and the act of suicide was given higher scores for being “the right thing to do.”","PeriodicalId":37202,"journal":{"name":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","volume":"155 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Altruistic suicide in the trolley problem1\",\"authors\":\"D. Lester\",\"doi\":\"10.2466/12.07.CP.3.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Sixty-four students enrolled in psychology courses were given the “trolley dilemma” in which either the person on the bridge pushed a stranger (who was killed) into the path of a train, diverting it and thereby saving the lives of five workmen on the train tracks, or the person himself or herself jumped off the bridge (and was killed) in order to divert the train. The suicide received significantly higher scores for heroism than the murderer, and the act of suicide was given higher scores for being “the right thing to do.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":37202,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"155 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2466/12.07.CP.3.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2466/12.07.CP.3.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Sixty-four students enrolled in psychology courses were given the “trolley dilemma” in which either the person on the bridge pushed a stranger (who was killed) into the path of a train, diverting it and thereby saving the lives of five workmen on the train tracks, or the person himself or herself jumped off the bridge (and was killed) in order to divert the train. The suicide received significantly higher scores for heroism than the murderer, and the act of suicide was given higher scores for being “the right thing to do.”