Abaxis Piccolo即时化学分析仪的评价:与罗氏Cobas C501的比较

E. Lee-Lewandrowski, J. Flood, R. Zak, David A Griggs, K. Lewandrowski
{"title":"Abaxis Piccolo即时化学分析仪的评价:与罗氏Cobas C501的比较","authors":"E. Lee-Lewandrowski, J. Flood, R. Zak, David A Griggs, K. Lewandrowski","doi":"10.1097/POC.0000000000000136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this study, we performed method validations for the Abaxis Piccolo Xpress assays for total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and glucose compared with the Roche Cobas c501 analyzer. The validation included linear reportable range, imprecision, and assessment of accuracy and bias by method crossover. Although some biases between the methods were observed, these could be reconciled by adjustments to the normal reference ranges. Overall, we found that these assays performed at an accepted level for clinical use.","PeriodicalId":20262,"journal":{"name":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Abaxis Piccolo Point-of-Care Chemistry Analyzer: Comparison to the Roche Cobas C501\",\"authors\":\"E. Lee-Lewandrowski, J. Flood, R. Zak, David A Griggs, K. Lewandrowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/POC.0000000000000136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this study, we performed method validations for the Abaxis Piccolo Xpress assays for total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and glucose compared with the Roche Cobas c501 analyzer. The validation included linear reportable range, imprecision, and assessment of accuracy and bias by method crossover. Although some biases between the methods were observed, these could be reconciled by adjustments to the normal reference ranges. Overall, we found that these assays performed at an accepted level for clinical use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,我们对Abaxis Piccolo Xpress检测总蛋白、白蛋白、丙氨酸转氨酶、天冬氨酸转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、总胆红素、钙、肌酐、尿素氮和葡萄糖的方法进行了验证,并与罗氏Cobas c501分析仪进行了比较。验证包括线性报告范围、不精确性以及通过方法交叉评估准确性和偏倚。虽然观察到方法之间存在一些偏差,但这些偏差可以通过调整正常参考范围来调和。总的来说,我们发现这些检测在临床应用中处于可接受的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Abaxis Piccolo Point-of-Care Chemistry Analyzer: Comparison to the Roche Cobas C501
Abstract In this study, we performed method validations for the Abaxis Piccolo Xpress assays for total protein, albumin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, calcium, creatinine, urea nitrogen, and glucose compared with the Roche Cobas c501 analyzer. The validation included linear reportable range, imprecision, and assessment of accuracy and bias by method crossover. Although some biases between the methods were observed, these could be reconciled by adjustments to the normal reference ranges. Overall, we found that these assays performed at an accepted level for clinical use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信