专题介绍

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Pierre-Olivier Méthot, Florence Vienne
{"title":"专题介绍","authors":"Pierre-Olivier Méthot, Florence Vienne","doi":"10.1086/726260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen increasing attention being paid to the “heritage” of the Gulf states, whether by local populations, academic and other commentators, or governments. Some of this has appeared to be part of a societal (and associated governmental) reaction to the pace of socio-cultural and economic change; some of it driven by bottom-up and/or top-down imperatives of nation-building and the attendant preservation, reframing or re-inventing, and reconstructing elements of real or ostensible heritage to that end; some of it came in the form of external interest, including of the journalistic and scholarly variety. Museums, schooling, locally-based research, cultural programming, government infrastructure and urbanization projects, and political strategies have all formed part of this multi-faceted set of phenomena; but so have popular initiatives and forms of behavior both reactive and pro-active. Some aspects of these developments have been translated into the sort and extent of highprofile projects and initiatives –– in an expanding mix of home-grown and imported activity –– that justifies talking about a “heritage boom” both in quantity and intensity –– whether measured by investment or by national and international reach. The narratives about heritage and the multiplying activity surrounding it in the Gulf have begun to attract academic attention especially in regard to the growth of museums across the region, with their obviously multiple aims. But there seemed to remain a good deal of space for, and value in, inviting fresh views on the wider phenomenon of this “heritage boom”, and heritage more generally, interrogating aspects that have arguably remained under-researched and/or using empirical cases to illuminate the theme in novel ways. To that end, the University of Exeter’s Center for Gulf Studies and Georgetown University in Qatar jointly convened a conference in 2014 on “The Heritage Boom in the Gulf: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives”. As convenors of the conference, among the things that struck us was not only the innovative work that was being undertaken on the subject in the Gulf and around the world, but also the mutual intellectual conversations much of this work drew on and in turn further elicited, both then and since. While some of the resulting work has since been published elsewhere, three of the papers presented, byMatthewMacLean, Martin Ledstrup and Thomas Fibiger, were subsequently developed into three of the articles that follow. The conversation also subsequently drew in a fourth scholar, Trinidad Rico, into the final version of this special section.","PeriodicalId":42878,"journal":{"name":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","volume":"26 1","pages":"454 - 462"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Section Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Pierre-Olivier Méthot, Florence Vienne\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/726260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have seen increasing attention being paid to the “heritage” of the Gulf states, whether by local populations, academic and other commentators, or governments. Some of this has appeared to be part of a societal (and associated governmental) reaction to the pace of socio-cultural and economic change; some of it driven by bottom-up and/or top-down imperatives of nation-building and the attendant preservation, reframing or re-inventing, and reconstructing elements of real or ostensible heritage to that end; some of it came in the form of external interest, including of the journalistic and scholarly variety. Museums, schooling, locally-based research, cultural programming, government infrastructure and urbanization projects, and political strategies have all formed part of this multi-faceted set of phenomena; but so have popular initiatives and forms of behavior both reactive and pro-active. Some aspects of these developments have been translated into the sort and extent of highprofile projects and initiatives –– in an expanding mix of home-grown and imported activity –– that justifies talking about a “heritage boom” both in quantity and intensity –– whether measured by investment or by national and international reach. The narratives about heritage and the multiplying activity surrounding it in the Gulf have begun to attract academic attention especially in regard to the growth of museums across the region, with their obviously multiple aims. But there seemed to remain a good deal of space for, and value in, inviting fresh views on the wider phenomenon of this “heritage boom”, and heritage more generally, interrogating aspects that have arguably remained under-researched and/or using empirical cases to illuminate the theme in novel ways. To that end, the University of Exeter’s Center for Gulf Studies and Georgetown University in Qatar jointly convened a conference in 2014 on “The Heritage Boom in the Gulf: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives”. As convenors of the conference, among the things that struck us was not only the innovative work that was being undertaken on the subject in the Gulf and around the world, but also the mutual intellectual conversations much of this work drew on and in turn further elicited, both then and since. While some of the resulting work has since been published elsewhere, three of the papers presented, byMatthewMacLean, Martin Ledstrup and Thomas Fibiger, were subsequently developed into three of the articles that follow. The conversation also subsequently drew in a fourth scholar, Trinidad Rico, into the final version of this special section.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"454 - 462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/726260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HOPOS-The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/726260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,无论是当地民众、学术界和其他评论人士,还是政府,都越来越关注海湾国家的“遗产”。其中一些似乎是社会(和相关政府)对社会文化和经济变化速度的反应的一部分;其中一些是由自下而上和/或自上而下的国家建设的需要以及随之而来的保护、重构或重新发明、重建真实或表面遗产的元素所驱动的;其中一些以外部兴趣的形式出现,包括新闻和学术方面的兴趣。博物馆、学校、地方研究、文化规划、政府基础设施和城市化项目以及政治战略都构成了这一多方面现象的一部分;但受欢迎的倡议和行为形式,无论是被动的还是主动的,也是如此。这些发展的某些方面已经转化为备受瞩目的项目和倡议的种类和程度——本土和进口活动的组合不断扩大——这证明了在数量和强度上谈论“遗产热潮”是合理的——无论是以投资还是以国内和国际影响力来衡量。关于遗产的叙述和海湾地区围绕遗产的不断增加的活动已经开始引起学术界的注意,特别是关于整个地区博物馆的增长,它们显然具有多重目标。但是,对于“遗产热潮”这一更广泛的现象,以及更广泛的遗产,邀请新的观点,质疑那些可能仍未得到充分研究的方面,以及/或使用经验案例以新颖的方式阐明这一主题,似乎仍有很大的空间和价值。为此,埃克塞特大学海湾研究中心和卡塔尔乔治城大学于2014年联合召开了一次题为“海湾地区的遗产繁荣:批判性和跨学科视角”的会议。作为会议的召集人,令我们印象深刻的不仅是海湾地区和世界各地正在就这一问题开展的创新工作,而且还有当时和此后这项工作所借鉴并进一步引发的相互智力对话。虽然一些研究成果已经在其他地方发表,但马修·麦克莱恩、马丁·莱德斯特鲁普和托马斯·菲比格发表的三篇论文随后被发展成下面的三篇文章。这次谈话随后还吸引了第四位学者特立尼达·里科(Trinidad Rico)加入这一特别部分的最终版本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Section Introduction
Recent years have seen increasing attention being paid to the “heritage” of the Gulf states, whether by local populations, academic and other commentators, or governments. Some of this has appeared to be part of a societal (and associated governmental) reaction to the pace of socio-cultural and economic change; some of it driven by bottom-up and/or top-down imperatives of nation-building and the attendant preservation, reframing or re-inventing, and reconstructing elements of real or ostensible heritage to that end; some of it came in the form of external interest, including of the journalistic and scholarly variety. Museums, schooling, locally-based research, cultural programming, government infrastructure and urbanization projects, and political strategies have all formed part of this multi-faceted set of phenomena; but so have popular initiatives and forms of behavior both reactive and pro-active. Some aspects of these developments have been translated into the sort and extent of highprofile projects and initiatives –– in an expanding mix of home-grown and imported activity –– that justifies talking about a “heritage boom” both in quantity and intensity –– whether measured by investment or by national and international reach. The narratives about heritage and the multiplying activity surrounding it in the Gulf have begun to attract academic attention especially in regard to the growth of museums across the region, with their obviously multiple aims. But there seemed to remain a good deal of space for, and value in, inviting fresh views on the wider phenomenon of this “heritage boom”, and heritage more generally, interrogating aspects that have arguably remained under-researched and/or using empirical cases to illuminate the theme in novel ways. To that end, the University of Exeter’s Center for Gulf Studies and Georgetown University in Qatar jointly convened a conference in 2014 on “The Heritage Boom in the Gulf: Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives”. As convenors of the conference, among the things that struck us was not only the innovative work that was being undertaken on the subject in the Gulf and around the world, but also the mutual intellectual conversations much of this work drew on and in turn further elicited, both then and since. While some of the resulting work has since been published elsewhere, three of the papers presented, byMatthewMacLean, Martin Ledstrup and Thomas Fibiger, were subsequently developed into three of the articles that follow. The conversation also subsequently drew in a fourth scholar, Trinidad Rico, into the final version of this special section.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信