{"title":"人-机器人交接过程中主动释放行为的影响","authors":"Zhao Han, H. Yanco","doi":"10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most research on human-robot handovers focuses on how the robot should approach human receivers and notify them of the readiness to take an object; few studies have investigated the effects of different release behaviors. Not releasing an object when a person desires to take it breaks handover fluency and creates a bad handover experience. In this paper, we investigate the effects of different release behaviors. Specifically, we study the benefits of a proactive release, during which the robot actively detects a human grasp effort pattern. In a 36-participant user study11The study is ready to reproduce with a Baxter robot. The code and environment setup is available at https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit, results suggest proactive release is more efficient than rigid release (which only releases when the robot is fully stopped) and passive release (the robot detects pulling by checking if a threshold value is reached). Subjectively, the overall handover experience is improved: the proactive release is significantly better in terms of handover fluency and ease-of-taking.","PeriodicalId":6600,"journal":{"name":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"440-448"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of Proactive Release Behaviors During Human-Robot Handovers\",\"authors\":\"Zhao Han, H. Yanco\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Most research on human-robot handovers focuses on how the robot should approach human receivers and notify them of the readiness to take an object; few studies have investigated the effects of different release behaviors. Not releasing an object when a person desires to take it breaks handover fluency and creates a bad handover experience. In this paper, we investigate the effects of different release behaviors. Specifically, we study the benefits of a proactive release, during which the robot actively detects a human grasp effort pattern. In a 36-participant user study11The study is ready to reproduce with a Baxter robot. The code and environment setup is available at https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit, results suggest proactive release is more efficient than rigid release (which only releases when the robot is fully stopped) and passive release (the robot detects pulling by checking if a threshold value is reached). Subjectively, the overall handover experience is improved: the proactive release is significantly better in terms of handover fluency and ease-of-taking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"440-448\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HRI.2019.8673085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effects of Proactive Release Behaviors During Human-Robot Handovers
Most research on human-robot handovers focuses on how the robot should approach human receivers and notify them of the readiness to take an object; few studies have investigated the effects of different release behaviors. Not releasing an object when a person desires to take it breaks handover fluency and creates a bad handover experience. In this paper, we investigate the effects of different release behaviors. Specifically, we study the benefits of a proactive release, during which the robot actively detects a human grasp effort pattern. In a 36-participant user study11The study is ready to reproduce with a Baxter robot. The code and environment setup is available at https://github.com/umhan35/handover_moveit, results suggest proactive release is more efficient than rigid release (which only releases when the robot is fully stopped) and passive release (the robot detects pulling by checking if a threshold value is reached). Subjectively, the overall handover experience is improved: the proactive release is significantly better in terms of handover fluency and ease-of-taking.