一个有争议的综合医学模式:冰岛的针灸

Robert Anderson MD, PhD (Professor of Anthropology)
{"title":"一个有争议的综合医学模式:冰岛的针灸","authors":"Robert Anderson MD, PhD (Professor of Anthropology)","doi":"10.1054/caom.2001.0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One way in which mainstream and alternative medicine can be integrated is documented in this case study of health care in Iceland, based on 5 months of anthropological field work. The situation is one of plural medicine, in which patients must decide for themselves how they will utilize some combination of conventional and alternative medicine, the latter being excluded from the national insurance system. To the extent that medical research demonstrates that certain alternative therapies are clinically efficacious for some diseases, the medical response in Iceland, as in many parts of the world, has been to perpetuate pluralism and to continue to marginalize alternative practitioners. This has been achieved because biomedical clinicians have appropriated for their own use the techniques that demonstrate efficacy. In Iceland this is true for acupuncture, which is now practiced by some physicians. It is recommended that dialogue be initiated to discuss ways in which exclusion and expropriation might be replaced by collaboration and synergism.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100265,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 158-162"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2001.0089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A contested model for integrated medicine: acupuncture in Iceland\",\"authors\":\"Robert Anderson MD, PhD (Professor of Anthropology)\",\"doi\":\"10.1054/caom.2001.0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>One way in which mainstream and alternative medicine can be integrated is documented in this case study of health care in Iceland, based on 5 months of anthropological field work. The situation is one of plural medicine, in which patients must decide for themselves how they will utilize some combination of conventional and alternative medicine, the latter being excluded from the national insurance system. To the extent that medical research demonstrates that certain alternative therapies are clinically efficacious for some diseases, the medical response in Iceland, as in many parts of the world, has been to perpetuate pluralism and to continue to marginalize alternative practitioners. This has been achieved because biomedical clinicians have appropriated for their own use the techniques that demonstrate efficacy. In Iceland this is true for acupuncture, which is now practiced by some physicians. It is recommended that dialogue be initiated to discuss ways in which exclusion and expropriation might be replaced by collaboration and synergism.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 158-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1054/caom.2001.0089\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144901900891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1461144901900891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据5个月的人类学实地工作,冰岛卫生保健案例研究记录了主流医学和替代医学相结合的一种方式。这是被排除在国民保险之外的传统医学和替代医学的组合,患者必须自行决定如何使用的“多元医学”。在医学研究表明某些替代疗法在临床上对某些疾病有效的情况下,冰岛的医疗反应与世界许多地方一样,一直是维持多元化,并继续将替代从业者边缘化。这已经实现了,因为生物医学临床医生已经为他们自己使用证明有效的技术。在冰岛,针灸也是如此,现在一些医生也在使用针灸。建议开展对话,讨论以协作和协同作用取代排斥和征用的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A contested model for integrated medicine: acupuncture in Iceland

One way in which mainstream and alternative medicine can be integrated is documented in this case study of health care in Iceland, based on 5 months of anthropological field work. The situation is one of plural medicine, in which patients must decide for themselves how they will utilize some combination of conventional and alternative medicine, the latter being excluded from the national insurance system. To the extent that medical research demonstrates that certain alternative therapies are clinically efficacious for some diseases, the medical response in Iceland, as in many parts of the world, has been to perpetuate pluralism and to continue to marginalize alternative practitioners. This has been achieved because biomedical clinicians have appropriated for their own use the techniques that demonstrate efficacy. In Iceland this is true for acupuncture, which is now practiced by some physicians. It is recommended that dialogue be initiated to discuss ways in which exclusion and expropriation might be replaced by collaboration and synergism.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信