文化背景下的父亲

Fathering Pub Date : 2013-04-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.50-4144
Randal D. Day, Nathan A. Jorgensen
{"title":"文化背景下的父亲","authors":"Randal D. Day, Nathan A. Jorgensen","doi":"10.5860/choice.50-4144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fathers in Cultural Context, edited by David W. Shwalb, Barbara J. Shwalb, Michael E. Lamb. 2012, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 448 pages.Fathers in Cultural Context is an edited book bringing together twenty-eight authors who write about fathers and fathering in fourteen different cultures. Most of the cultures covered are not surprising and are rather mainstream, including China, Japan, India, the Caribbean, some European countries and the U.S. Other cultures present a major draw-back of an edited book such as this- scope. Certain cultures covered are particularly complex, containing dozens of sub-cultures, languages, traditions, religions, and economic strata. The editors address this challenge in the introductory chapter and develop a basic outline for each chapter. This outline includes case or representative stories, cultural and contextual influences, a summary of existing research, social policy issues, and future directions, speculations, comparisons, and predictions.For example, in Chapter 2, the authors introduce readers to the influences of Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist thought on traditional Chinese family life and fatherhood. They note that in recent years, significant social and economic changes, such as the family planning policy, have greatly influenced fatherhood. Their analysis includes an examination of differences between urban and rural populations, diverse ethnic groups, the impact of gender/employment policies, and changing family structure. The authors carefully take us through the scant but current research on fathers that is emerging in Mainland China- not just Taiwan. A primary conclusion in this chapter is that today's fathers may be more involved than those in previous generations. We find a similar conclusion in Chapter 3 on fathering in Japan.In Japan, however, we learn that rapid economic growth has been a primary challenge to fathers as they connect with their children. This chapter alerts us to recent policy shifts in which government and non-profit organizations have put forth extensive efforts to promote child rearing and fatherhood. Young Japanese fathers are seemingly more engaged than fathers in the 20* century, and the authors predict that this will continue.By contrast, Chapter 4 relates how fathers in India are very important figures, but research is particularly scarce, as much more attention has been given to women and mothers. Social policies related to the family are outdated relative to global trends, although several adaptations have been made in recent years. It appears that there has not been nearly as much ground-swell shift in increased father involvement in India - but that conclusion is somewhat hampered by the lack of a significant body of basic research. This chapter, it seems to us, was weaker, not because of author inattentiveness or writing quality, but because of the generally scattered research efforts about Indian fathers.We were pleased to see two strong chapters about Muslim fathers. The chapters on fathers in Bangladesh/Malaysia and fathers in the Arab world were very instructive and well written. Both mention the effects of globalization and economic growth and the changes that are occurring as traditional gender roles are reshaped within these communities. We were also very interested in Chapter 5's essay on the misinterpretations and general misunderstandings about fatherhood in Islam. Information on government initiatives related to fatherhood is not available in these cultures, but the authors suggest that social policies address the effects of male immigration. The author of Chapter 6 concludes with hope for the future despite the prevalence of negative contexts and trends. Our assessment of these two chapters is that they were among the strongest in the book. They were well-written, had a comfortable flow, and the topics covered were informative and useful.The challenge of scope mentioned above is particularly evident in Chapters 7 and 8 on black African fathers. …","PeriodicalId":88482,"journal":{"name":"Fathering","volume":"34 1","pages":"238"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fathers in Cultural Context\",\"authors\":\"Randal D. Day, Nathan A. Jorgensen\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.50-4144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fathers in Cultural Context, edited by David W. Shwalb, Barbara J. Shwalb, Michael E. Lamb. 2012, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 448 pages.Fathers in Cultural Context is an edited book bringing together twenty-eight authors who write about fathers and fathering in fourteen different cultures. Most of the cultures covered are not surprising and are rather mainstream, including China, Japan, India, the Caribbean, some European countries and the U.S. Other cultures present a major draw-back of an edited book such as this- scope. Certain cultures covered are particularly complex, containing dozens of sub-cultures, languages, traditions, religions, and economic strata. The editors address this challenge in the introductory chapter and develop a basic outline for each chapter. This outline includes case or representative stories, cultural and contextual influences, a summary of existing research, social policy issues, and future directions, speculations, comparisons, and predictions.For example, in Chapter 2, the authors introduce readers to the influences of Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist thought on traditional Chinese family life and fatherhood. They note that in recent years, significant social and economic changes, such as the family planning policy, have greatly influenced fatherhood. Their analysis includes an examination of differences between urban and rural populations, diverse ethnic groups, the impact of gender/employment policies, and changing family structure. The authors carefully take us through the scant but current research on fathers that is emerging in Mainland China- not just Taiwan. A primary conclusion in this chapter is that today's fathers may be more involved than those in previous generations. We find a similar conclusion in Chapter 3 on fathering in Japan.In Japan, however, we learn that rapid economic growth has been a primary challenge to fathers as they connect with their children. This chapter alerts us to recent policy shifts in which government and non-profit organizations have put forth extensive efforts to promote child rearing and fatherhood. Young Japanese fathers are seemingly more engaged than fathers in the 20* century, and the authors predict that this will continue.By contrast, Chapter 4 relates how fathers in India are very important figures, but research is particularly scarce, as much more attention has been given to women and mothers. Social policies related to the family are outdated relative to global trends, although several adaptations have been made in recent years. It appears that there has not been nearly as much ground-swell shift in increased father involvement in India - but that conclusion is somewhat hampered by the lack of a significant body of basic research. This chapter, it seems to us, was weaker, not because of author inattentiveness or writing quality, but because of the generally scattered research efforts about Indian fathers.We were pleased to see two strong chapters about Muslim fathers. The chapters on fathers in Bangladesh/Malaysia and fathers in the Arab world were very instructive and well written. Both mention the effects of globalization and economic growth and the changes that are occurring as traditional gender roles are reshaped within these communities. We were also very interested in Chapter 5's essay on the misinterpretations and general misunderstandings about fatherhood in Islam. Information on government initiatives related to fatherhood is not available in these cultures, but the authors suggest that social policies address the effects of male immigration. The author of Chapter 6 concludes with hope for the future despite the prevalence of negative contexts and trends. Our assessment of these two chapters is that they were among the strongest in the book. They were well-written, had a comfortable flow, and the topics covered were informative and useful.The challenge of scope mentioned above is particularly evident in Chapters 7 and 8 on black African fathers. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":88482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fathering\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"238\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fathering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-4144\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fathering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.50-4144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

摘要

《文化语境中的父亲》,大卫·w·施瓦布、芭芭拉·j·施瓦布、迈克尔·e·兰姆主编,2012年,劳特利奇/泰勒和弗朗西斯集团出版,448页。《文化语境中的父亲》是一本编辑过的书,汇集了28位作者,他们写了14种不同文化中的父亲和父亲的故事。所涵盖的大多数文化并不令人惊讶,而且是相当主流的,包括中国,日本,印度,加勒比地区,一些欧洲国家和美国。其他文化则是像这样一本编辑过的书的主要缺点-范围。所涵盖的某些文化特别复杂,包含数十种亚文化、语言、传统、宗教和经济阶层。编者在导论章节中解决了这一挑战,并为每章制定了基本大纲。本大纲包括案例或代表性故事、文化和背景影响、现有研究总结、社会政策问题、未来方向、推测、比较和预测。例如,在第二章中,作者向读者介绍了儒家、道家和佛教思想对中国传统家庭生活和父亲身份的影响。他们指出,近年来,重大的社会和经济变化,例如计划生育政策,极大地影响了父亲。他们的分析包括检查城乡人口之间的差异、不同种族群体、性别/就业政策的影响以及不断变化的家庭结构。作者们仔细地向我们介绍了中国大陆——而不仅仅是台湾——正在兴起的关于父亲的研究,这些研究很少,但却很流行。本章的一个主要结论是,今天的父亲可能比前几代人更多地参与其中。在第三章中,我们发现了类似的结论。然而,在日本,我们了解到,快速的经济增长已经成为父亲与孩子建立联系的主要挑战。这一章提醒我们注意最近的政策转变,政府和非营利组织已经投入了大量的努力来促进孩子的养育和父亲的责任。年轻的日本父亲似乎比20世纪的父亲更投入,作者预测这种情况将继续下去。相比之下,第4章讲述了印度的父亲是如何成为非常重要的人物,但研究特别少,因为更多的关注是女性和母亲。与全球趋势相比,与家庭有关的社会政策已经过时,尽管近年来作出了若干调整。在印度,似乎在增加父亲参与育儿方面并没有出现如此巨大的变化,但由于缺乏重要的基础研究,这一结论在一定程度上受到了阻碍。在我们看来,这一章较弱,不是因为作者的粗心大意或写作质量,而是因为关于印度父亲的研究工作普遍分散。我们很高兴看到关于穆斯林父亲的两个强有力的章节。关于孟加拉国/马来西亚的父亲和阿拉伯世界的父亲的章节非常有启发性,写得很好。两者都提到全球化和经济增长的影响,以及这些社区内传统性别角色被重新塑造时所发生的变化。我们对第五章关于伊斯兰教中对父亲身份的误解和普遍误解的文章也很感兴趣。在这些文化中,没有关于政府在做父亲方面的举措的信息,但作者认为,社会政策解决了男性移民的影响。第六章的作者总结了对未来的希望,尽管普遍存在消极的背景和趋势。我们对这两章的评价是,它们是本书中最强的章节之一。它们写得很好,有一个舒适的流程,所涵盖的主题是信息丰富和有用的。上面提到的范围的挑战在第7章和第8章关于非洲黑人父亲的文章中尤为明显。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fathers in Cultural Context
Fathers in Cultural Context, edited by David W. Shwalb, Barbara J. Shwalb, Michael E. Lamb. 2012, Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group, 448 pages.Fathers in Cultural Context is an edited book bringing together twenty-eight authors who write about fathers and fathering in fourteen different cultures. Most of the cultures covered are not surprising and are rather mainstream, including China, Japan, India, the Caribbean, some European countries and the U.S. Other cultures present a major draw-back of an edited book such as this- scope. Certain cultures covered are particularly complex, containing dozens of sub-cultures, languages, traditions, religions, and economic strata. The editors address this challenge in the introductory chapter and develop a basic outline for each chapter. This outline includes case or representative stories, cultural and contextual influences, a summary of existing research, social policy issues, and future directions, speculations, comparisons, and predictions.For example, in Chapter 2, the authors introduce readers to the influences of Confucian, Taoist, and Buddhist thought on traditional Chinese family life and fatherhood. They note that in recent years, significant social and economic changes, such as the family planning policy, have greatly influenced fatherhood. Their analysis includes an examination of differences between urban and rural populations, diverse ethnic groups, the impact of gender/employment policies, and changing family structure. The authors carefully take us through the scant but current research on fathers that is emerging in Mainland China- not just Taiwan. A primary conclusion in this chapter is that today's fathers may be more involved than those in previous generations. We find a similar conclusion in Chapter 3 on fathering in Japan.In Japan, however, we learn that rapid economic growth has been a primary challenge to fathers as they connect with their children. This chapter alerts us to recent policy shifts in which government and non-profit organizations have put forth extensive efforts to promote child rearing and fatherhood. Young Japanese fathers are seemingly more engaged than fathers in the 20* century, and the authors predict that this will continue.By contrast, Chapter 4 relates how fathers in India are very important figures, but research is particularly scarce, as much more attention has been given to women and mothers. Social policies related to the family are outdated relative to global trends, although several adaptations have been made in recent years. It appears that there has not been nearly as much ground-swell shift in increased father involvement in India - but that conclusion is somewhat hampered by the lack of a significant body of basic research. This chapter, it seems to us, was weaker, not because of author inattentiveness or writing quality, but because of the generally scattered research efforts about Indian fathers.We were pleased to see two strong chapters about Muslim fathers. The chapters on fathers in Bangladesh/Malaysia and fathers in the Arab world were very instructive and well written. Both mention the effects of globalization and economic growth and the changes that are occurring as traditional gender roles are reshaped within these communities. We were also very interested in Chapter 5's essay on the misinterpretations and general misunderstandings about fatherhood in Islam. Information on government initiatives related to fatherhood is not available in these cultures, but the authors suggest that social policies address the effects of male immigration. The author of Chapter 6 concludes with hope for the future despite the prevalence of negative contexts and trends. Our assessment of these two chapters is that they were among the strongest in the book. They were well-written, had a comfortable flow, and the topics covered were informative and useful.The challenge of scope mentioned above is particularly evident in Chapters 7 and 8 on black African fathers. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信