下一代攻击机概念设计研究

Daniel P. Raymer
{"title":"下一代攻击机概念设计研究","authors":"Daniel P. Raymer","doi":"10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100070,"journal":{"name":"Aircraft Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next generation attack fighter conceptual design study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P. Raymer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aircraft Design\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aircraft Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369886998000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aircraft Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369886998000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前空军、海军和海军陆战队的战斗机/攻击机是20世纪70年代的复古设计,将在下个世纪初达到其使用寿命的终点。虽然空军正在开发高度先进的F-22,但由于成本问题,它不能用来取代所有现有资产,尤其是F-16。一种“低端”的互补设计是必需的,就像F-16是F-15“高低混合”中的“低端”一样。与早期版本相比,海军的F-18 E/F将具有改进的特性,但它不能充分利用新技术,特别是不能达到可达到的隐身水平和射程有效载荷性能,也不能为海军陆战队提供下一代STOVL能力。兰德公司的空军项目在1993年至1995年期间对下一代攻击战斗机的需求规范进行了权衡研究。作为其中的一部分,本文作者开发并分析了下一代攻击战斗机(NGAF)的代表性概念设计概念,然后进行了射程、性能、有效载荷和技术的贸易研究,随后研究了实现三军种能力的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Next generation attack fighter conceptual design study

Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信