南美洲的新生代恐龙——重访

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Molnar, F. Vasconcellos
{"title":"南美洲的新生代恐龙——重访","authors":"R. Molnar, F. Vasconcellos","doi":"10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Molnar, R.E. and Mesquita de Vasconcellos, F. 2016. Cenozoic dinosaurs in South America – revisited. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 363–377. Of course there were Cenozoic dinosaurs (theropods) in South America, phorusrhacid (‘terror’) birds among others, but that is not the subject here. Why did anyone think there were Cenozoic (non-avian) theropods in South America? Because of a misinterpretation of Ameghino’s belief that derived mammals lived along with dinosaurs in Late Cretaceous Argentina. But also because isolated theropod teeth were found associated with derived (Eocene) mammal fossils. These turned out to be the teeth of Sebecus icaeorhinus. This is a small crocodylomorph, skull length c. 450 mm. More recently discovered sebecosuchians were substantially larger: Barinasuchus arveloi had an (estimated) skull length of c. 1000 mm, similar to that of Daspletosaurus (1000 mm). These crocodylomorphs are generally believed to have been terrestrial animals, presumably preying on large mammals. Thus, although there were no large non-avian theropods in Cenozoic South America, there were crocodylomorphs that seem to have been ecological vicars of large theropods. The reconstruction of terrestrial trophic networks for large terrestrial tetrapods after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions seems to have been slower than often supposed. At (or near) the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, large herbivores turned over from archosaurs to mammals, but turnover of large carnivores was slower. In South America, dinosaur-size crocodylomorphs lived as late as the Miocene. Thus modern terrestrial ecosystems do not, trophically, reflect those of even the Early Neogene in some southern continents. Sebecosuchians, at least in South America, seem to have been unaffected by the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions.","PeriodicalId":53647,"journal":{"name":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","volume":"1 1","pages":"363-377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cenozoic dinosaurs in South America – revisited\",\"authors\":\"R. Molnar, F. Vasconcellos\",\"doi\":\"10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Molnar, R.E. and Mesquita de Vasconcellos, F. 2016. Cenozoic dinosaurs in South America – revisited. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 363–377. Of course there were Cenozoic dinosaurs (theropods) in South America, phorusrhacid (‘terror’) birds among others, but that is not the subject here. Why did anyone think there were Cenozoic (non-avian) theropods in South America? Because of a misinterpretation of Ameghino’s belief that derived mammals lived along with dinosaurs in Late Cretaceous Argentina. But also because isolated theropod teeth were found associated with derived (Eocene) mammal fossils. These turned out to be the teeth of Sebecus icaeorhinus. This is a small crocodylomorph, skull length c. 450 mm. More recently discovered sebecosuchians were substantially larger: Barinasuchus arveloi had an (estimated) skull length of c. 1000 mm, similar to that of Daspletosaurus (1000 mm). These crocodylomorphs are generally believed to have been terrestrial animals, presumably preying on large mammals. Thus, although there were no large non-avian theropods in Cenozoic South America, there were crocodylomorphs that seem to have been ecological vicars of large theropods. The reconstruction of terrestrial trophic networks for large terrestrial tetrapods after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions seems to have been slower than often supposed. At (or near) the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, large herbivores turned over from archosaurs to mammals, but turnover of large carnivores was slower. In South America, dinosaur-size crocodylomorphs lived as late as the Miocene. Thus modern terrestrial ecosystems do not, trophically, reflect those of even the Early Neogene in some southern continents. Sebecosuchians, at least in South America, seem to have been unaffected by the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"363-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memoirs of Museum Victoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memoirs of Museum Victoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24199/J.MMV.2016.74.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

Molnar, R.E.和Mesquita de Vasconcellos, F. 2016。南美洲的新生代恐龙——重访。维多利亚博物馆回忆录74:363-377。当然,南美洲也有新生代恐龙(兽脚亚目恐龙),恐鸟(“恐怖”)等,但这不是这里的主题。为什么有人会认为南美洲有新生代(非鸟类)兽脚亚目恐龙?因为对Ameghino关于衍生哺乳动物与恐龙一起生活在晚白垩纪阿根廷的观点的误解。但也因为分离的兽脚亚目动物牙齿与衍生的(始新世)哺乳动物化石有关。这些牙齿原来是西贝斯·伊卡龙的牙齿。这是一只小鳄鱼形动物,头骨长约450毫米。最近发现的sebecosuchians要大得多:Barinasuchus arveloi(估计)的头骨长度约为1000毫米,与Daspletosaurus(1000毫米)相似。人们普遍认为这些鳄鱼是陆生动物,可能以大型哺乳动物为食。因此,尽管在新生代的南美洲没有大型的非鸟类兽脚亚目恐龙,但有鳄鱼形恐龙,它们似乎是大型兽脚亚目恐龙的生态代理人。白垩纪-古近纪灭绝后,大型陆生四足动物陆地营养网络的重建似乎比人们通常认为的要慢。在(或接近)白垩纪-古近纪界线处,大型食草动物由祖龙向哺乳动物转变,但大型食肉动物的转变速度较慢。在南美洲,恐龙大小的鳄形兽生活在中新世。因此,在某些南方大陆,现代陆地生态系统在营养方面甚至不能反映新近纪早期的生态系统。至少在南美洲,Sebecosuchians似乎没有受到白垩纪-古近纪灭绝的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cenozoic dinosaurs in South America – revisited
Molnar, R.E. and Mesquita de Vasconcellos, F. 2016. Cenozoic dinosaurs in South America – revisited. Memoirs of Museum Victoria 74: 363–377. Of course there were Cenozoic dinosaurs (theropods) in South America, phorusrhacid (‘terror’) birds among others, but that is not the subject here. Why did anyone think there were Cenozoic (non-avian) theropods in South America? Because of a misinterpretation of Ameghino’s belief that derived mammals lived along with dinosaurs in Late Cretaceous Argentina. But also because isolated theropod teeth were found associated with derived (Eocene) mammal fossils. These turned out to be the teeth of Sebecus icaeorhinus. This is a small crocodylomorph, skull length c. 450 mm. More recently discovered sebecosuchians were substantially larger: Barinasuchus arveloi had an (estimated) skull length of c. 1000 mm, similar to that of Daspletosaurus (1000 mm). These crocodylomorphs are generally believed to have been terrestrial animals, presumably preying on large mammals. Thus, although there were no large non-avian theropods in Cenozoic South America, there were crocodylomorphs that seem to have been ecological vicars of large theropods. The reconstruction of terrestrial trophic networks for large terrestrial tetrapods after the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions seems to have been slower than often supposed. At (or near) the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary, large herbivores turned over from archosaurs to mammals, but turnover of large carnivores was slower. In South America, dinosaur-size crocodylomorphs lived as late as the Miocene. Thus modern terrestrial ecosystems do not, trophically, reflect those of even the Early Neogene in some southern continents. Sebecosuchians, at least in South America, seem to have been unaffected by the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinctions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memoirs of Museum Victoria
Memoirs of Museum Victoria Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信