穿着美德:柏拉图的理想国V, 449a-457b和苏格拉底关于女性本性的辩论

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cinzia Arruzza
{"title":"穿着美德:柏拉图的理想国V, 449a-457b和苏格拉底关于女性本性的辩论","authors":"Cinzia Arruzza","doi":"10.14195/1984-249x_33_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Plato’s Republic V, 449a-457b, Socrates argues that the guardian class of Kallipolis will comprise both men and women and that women with the appropriate nature ought to receive the same education and fulfill the same tasks as their male counterparts. In this article I argue, against competing interpretations of this claim as dependent either on the necessity of abolishing the oikos or on eugenic principles, that Socrates’ argument ought to be understood as a genuine argument about women’s natural capabilities and ought to be interpreted in light of the Socratic debate about women’s virtues. Moreover, I show that the legal language mobilized, combined with polemical references to Aristophanes, serves the purpose of evoking Socrates’ trial, thus alerting the reader to the seriousness of the proposal in question.","PeriodicalId":41249,"journal":{"name":"Archai-Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wearing Virtue: Plato’s Republic V, 449a-457b and the Socratic Debate on Women’s Nature\",\"authors\":\"Cinzia Arruzza\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/1984-249x_33_06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Plato’s Republic V, 449a-457b, Socrates argues that the guardian class of Kallipolis will comprise both men and women and that women with the appropriate nature ought to receive the same education and fulfill the same tasks as their male counterparts. In this article I argue, against competing interpretations of this claim as dependent either on the necessity of abolishing the oikos or on eugenic principles, that Socrates’ argument ought to be understood as a genuine argument about women’s natural capabilities and ought to be interpreted in light of the Socratic debate about women’s virtues. Moreover, I show that the legal language mobilized, combined with polemical references to Aristophanes, serves the purpose of evoking Socrates’ trial, thus alerting the reader to the seriousness of the proposal in question.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41249,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archai-Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archai-Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249x_33_06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archai-Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens do Pensamento Ocidental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249x_33_06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在柏拉图的《理想国》第五篇(449a-457b)中,苏格拉底认为卡利波利斯的守护者阶级将由男性和女性组成,具有适当天性的女性应该接受与男性同等的教育,完成与男性同等的任务。在这篇文章中,我反对对这一主张的竞争性解释,认为这一主张要么依赖于废除oikos的必要性,要么依赖于优生原则,苏格拉底的论点应该被理解为关于女性自然能力的真正论点,应该根据苏格拉底关于女性美德的辩论来解释。此外,我表明,动员的法律语言,结合对阿里斯托芬的辩论性引用,服务于唤起苏格拉底审判的目的,从而提醒读者,有问题的提议的严重性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wearing Virtue: Plato’s Republic V, 449a-457b and the Socratic Debate on Women’s Nature
In Plato’s Republic V, 449a-457b, Socrates argues that the guardian class of Kallipolis will comprise both men and women and that women with the appropriate nature ought to receive the same education and fulfill the same tasks as their male counterparts. In this article I argue, against competing interpretations of this claim as dependent either on the necessity of abolishing the oikos or on eugenic principles, that Socrates’ argument ought to be understood as a genuine argument about women’s natural capabilities and ought to be interpreted in light of the Socratic debate about women’s virtues. Moreover, I show that the legal language mobilized, combined with polemical references to Aristophanes, serves the purpose of evoking Socrates’ trial, thus alerting the reader to the seriousness of the proposal in question.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信